Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Three and twelve-month analysis of the PROM-Q study: comparison of patient-reported outcome measures using the BREAST-Q questionnaire in pre- vs. sub-pectoral implant-based immediate breast reconstruction.
Rampal, Ritika; Jones, Stacey Jessica; Hartup, Sue; Robertson, Clare; Tahir, Wasif; Jones, Sian Louise; McKenzie, Shireen; Savage, Jessica Anne; Kim, Baek.
Afiliação
  • Rampal R; The Breast Unit at the Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK. Ritika.rampal1@nhs.net.
  • Jones SJ; Department of Breast Surgery, Huddersfield Royal Infirmary, Huddersfield, HD3 3EA, UK.
  • Hartup S; The Breast Unit at the Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
  • Robertson C; The Breast Unit at the Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
  • Tahir W; The Breast Unit at the Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
  • Jones SL; The Breast Unit at the Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
  • McKenzie S; The Breast Unit at the Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
  • Savage JA; Department of Plastic Surgery, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, SP2 8BJ, UK.
  • Kim B; The Breast Unit at the Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38985220
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) is being increasingly performed with implant placed above the pectoral muscle (pre-pectoral), instead of below the pectoral muscle (sub-pectoral). Currently, there is a lack of comparative data on clinical and patient-perceived outcomes between pre- vs. sub-pectoral IBR. We investigated whether this difference in surgical approach influenced clinical or patient-perceived outcomes.

METHODS:

This prospective non-randomised longitudinal cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04842240) recruited patients undergoing immediate IBR at the Leeds Breast Unit (Sep 2019-Sep 2021). Data collection included patient characteristics and post-operative complications. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures were collected using the BREAST-Q questionnaire at baseline, 2 weeks, 3- and 12-months post-surgery.

RESULTS:

Seventy-eight patients underwent IBR (46 patients pre-pectoral; 59% vs. 32 patients sub-pectoral; 41%). Similar complication rates were observed (15.2% pre-pectoral vs. 9.4% sub-pectoral; p = 0.44). Overall implant loss rate was 3.8% (6.5% pre-pectoral vs. 0% sub-pectoral; p = 0.13). Respective median Breast-Q scores for pre- and sub-pectoral IBR at 3 months were breast satisfaction (58 vs. 48; p = 0.01), psychosocial well-being (60 vs. 57; p = 0.9), physical well-being (68 vs. 76; p = 0.53), and Animation Q scores (73 vs. 76; p = 0.45). Respective Breast-Q scores at 12 months were breast satisfaction (58 vs. 53; p = 0.3), psychosocial well-being (59 vs. 60; p = 0.9), physical well-being (68 vs. 78; p = 0.18), and Animation Q scores (69 vs. 73; p = 0.4).

CONCLUSIONS:

This study demonstrates equivalent clinical and patient-perceived outcomes between pre- and sub-pectoral IBR. The study findings can be utilised to aid informed decision making regarding either surgical option.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article