Managing giant omphalocele: A systematic review of surgical techniques and outcomes.

ABSTRACT

AIM: We analysed closure techniques in the treatment of giant omphalocele. A challenging pathology where there lacks consensus. METHODS: Cochrane, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched between 1 January 1992 and 31 December 2022 using terms and variations omphalocele, exomphalos, giant, closure and outcome. Papers were selected using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analyses 2020 criteria. Data collected included demographics, timing and technique of surgical repair, morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: We identified 342 papers; 34 met inclusion criteria with a total 356 neonates. Initial non-operative management was described in 26 papers (14 dressings, eight silo, four serial sac-ligation). Operative techniques by paper were as follows Early closure nine primary suture closure without patch, two primary closure with patch and four mixed methods. Delayed closure five simple, four-component separation technique, four tissue expanders, one Botox/pneumoperitoneum and two with patch. Median number of procedures was two (1-6) in the early group versus three (1-4) in the delayed. The most favourable was early primary closure with biological patch. The most unfavourable was delayed closure with patch. Cumulative reported mortality remained high, mostly due to non-surgical causes. CONCLUSION: Definitions of giant omphalocele in the literature were heterogeneous with a variety of management approaches described.