Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Applying 3D-printed prostheses to reconstruct critical-sized bone defects of tibial diaphysis (> 10 cm) caused by osteomyelitis and aseptic non-union.
Liu, Bingchuan; Wang, Liwei; Li, Xingcai; Chen, Zhuo; Hou, Guojin; Zhou, Fang; Wang, Caimei; Tian, Yun.
Afiliação
  • Liu B; Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Wang L; Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
  • Li X; Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
  • Chen Z; Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Hou G; Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
  • Zhou F; Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Wang C; Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
  • Tian Y; Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 19(1): 418, 2024 Jul 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39033286
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Clinical repair of critical-sized bone defects (CBDs) in the tibial diaphysis presents numerous challenges, including inadequate soft tissue coverage, limited blood supply, high load-bearing demands, and potential deformities. This study aimed to investigate the clinical feasibility and efficacy of employing 3D-printed prostheses for repairing CBDs exceeding 10 cm in the tibial diaphysis.

METHODS:

This retrospective study included 14 patients (11 males and 3 females) with an average age of 46.0 years. The etiologies of CBDs comprised chronic osteomyelitis (10 cases) and aseptic non-union (4 cases), with an average defect length of 16.9 cm. All patients underwent a two-stage surgical

approach:

(1) debridement, osteotomy, and cement spacer implantation; and (2) insertion of 3D-printed prostheses. The interval between the two stages ranged from 8 to 12 weeks, during which the 3D-printed prostheses and induced membranes were meticulously prepared. Subsequent to surgery, patients engaged in weight-bearing and functional exercises under specialized supervision. Follow-up assessments, including gross observation, imaging examinations, and administration of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), were conducted at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, followed by annual evaluations thereafter.

RESULTS:

The mean postoperative follow-up duration was 28.4 months, with an average waiting period between prosthesis implantation and weight-bearing of 10.4 days. At the latest follow-up, all patients demonstrated autonomous ambulation without assistance, and their LEFS scores exhibited a significant improvement compared to preoperative values (30.7 vs. 53.1, P < 0.001). Imaging assessments revealed progressive bone regeneration at the defect site, with new bone formation extending along the prosthesis. Complications included interlocking screw breakage in two patients, interlocking screw loosening in one patient, and nail breakage in another.

CONCLUSIONS:

Utilization of 3D-printed prostheses facilitates prompt restoration of CBDs in the tibial diaphysis, enabling early initiation of weight-bearing activities and recovery of ambulatory function. This efficacious surgical approach holds promise for practical application.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteomielite / Tíbia / Diáfises / Impressão Tridimensional Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteomielite / Tíbia / Diáfises / Impressão Tridimensional Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article