Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcomes of repeat conventional transarterial chemoembolization in patients with liver metastases.
Ghabili, Kamyar; Windham-Herman, Austin-Marley; Konstantinidis, Menelaos; Murali, Nikitha; Borde, Tabea; Adam, Lucas C; Laage-Gaupp, Fabian; Lin, MingDe; Chapiro, Julius; Georgiades, Christos; Nezami, Nariman.
Afiliação
  • Ghabili K; Department of Radiology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA; Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
  • Windham-Herman AM; Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Department of Interventional Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
  • Konstantinidis M; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Canada.
  • Murali N; Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Borde T; Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Hum
  • Adam LC; Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Hum
  • Laage-Gaupp F; Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
  • Lin M; Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
  • Chapiro J; Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
  • Georgiades C; Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Nezami N; Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medstar Georgetown Hospital, Washington, DC, USA; Georgetown
Ann Hepatol ; 29(6): 101529, 2024 Jul 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39033928
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND

OBJECTIVES:

Although unlimited sessions of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) may be performed for liver metastases, there is no data indicating when treatment becomes ineffective. This study aimed to determine the optimal number of repeat cTACE sessions for nonresponding patients before abandoning cTACE in patients with liver metastases. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

In this retrospective, single-institutional analysis, patients with liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors (NET), colorectal carcinoma (CRC), and lung cancer who underwent consecutive cTACE sessions from 2001 to 2015 were studied. Quantitative European Association for Study of the Liver (qEASL) criteria were utilized for response assessment. The association between the number of cTACE and 2-year, 5-year, and overall survival was evaluated to estimate the optimal number of cTACE for each survival outcome.

RESULTS:

Eighty-five patients underwent a total of 186 cTACE sessions for 117 liver metastases, of which 30.7 % responded to the first cTACE. For the target lesions that did not respond to the first, second, and third cTACE sessions, response rates after the second, third, and fourth cTACE sessions were 33.3 %, 23 %, and 25 %, respectively. The fourth cTACE session was the optimal number for 2-year survival (HR 0.40; 95 %CI 0.16-0.97; p = 0.04), 5-year survival (HR 0.31; 95 %CI 0.11-0.87; p = 0.02), and overall survival (HR 0.35; 95 %CI 0.13-0.89; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS:

Repeat cTACE in the management of liver metastases from NET, CRC, and lung cancer was associated with improved patient survival. We recommend at least four cTACE sessions before switching to another treatment for nonresponding metastatic liver lesions.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article