The positive impact of targeted modulating food intolerance on immune-related recurrent pregnancy loss.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It has been proven that immune disorders are one of the vital risk factors of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), and the presence of food intolerance seems to play an essential role in this. However, the impact of immune status induced by food intolerance on RPL has not been reported. This study utilized a targeted diet avoiding food intolerance as much as possible for each participant to investigate their effects on pregnancy outcomes in RPL patients with positive autoimmune markers. METHODS: From January 2020 to May 2021, fifty-eight patients with RPL were enrolled. They were divided into two groups based on the presence of autoantibodies the autoantibody-positive group (AP, n = 29) and the autoantibody-negative group (AN, n = 29). Their food-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) G antibodies for 90 foods were tested using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The levels of immune parameters and the presence of gastrointestinal discomforts (diarrhea or constipation, eczema, and mouth ulcers) were recorded before and after dietary conditioning, followed by the analysis of pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: Compared to the AN group, the patients in the AP group showed immune disorders at baseline, such as reduced levels of IL-4 and complement C3, and increased levels of IL-2 and total B cells. These parameters within the AP group were significantly improved after dietary conditioning that avoided food intolerance, while no significant changes were observed in the AN group. Patients in the AP group had significantly higher food-specific IgG antibodies for cow's milk (89.66% vs. 48.28%, p < .001), yolk (86.21% vs. 27.59%, p < .001), bamboo shoots (86.21% vs. 44.83%, p < .001) compared to those in the AN group. Additionally, gastrointestinal discomforts including diarrhea or constipation, eczema, and mouth ulcers were more common in the AP group than in the AN group. After 3-month dietary conditioning, these significantly improved characteristics were only observed in the AP group (p < .001). Finally, the baby-holding rate was higher in the AP group compared to the AN group (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The RPL patients in the AN group did not exhibit immune disorders, whereas those in the AP group experienced immune disorders and gastrointestinal discomforts. For patient with positive autoantibodies, dietary intervention may mitigate immune disorders and gastrointestinal discomforts, presenting a promising approach to enhance pregnancy outcomes.