Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Radiographic graft changes following maxillary sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone compared with composite grafts: a one-year single-blind randomized controlled trial.
Starch-Jensen, T; Ahmad, M; Bruun, N H; Spin-Neto, R; Hellén-Halme, K; Becktor, J P.
Afiliação
  • Starch-Jensen T; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital and Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. Electronic address: thomas.jensen@rn.dk.
  • Ahmad M; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Medicine, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Bruun NH; Research Data and Biostatistics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
  • Spin-Neto R; Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, Section for Oral Radiology, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Hellén-Halme K; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden; Section of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Department of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
  • Becktor JP; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Medicine, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39054192
ABSTRACT
This study evaluated radiographic graft changes following maxillary sinus floor augmentation with (A) autogenous bone, (B) 11 autogenous bone and deproteinized porcine bone mineral, or (C) 11 autogenous bone and biphasic bone graft material. Sixty patients were randomly allocated to groups A, B, and C (20 in each). CBCT scans were obtained at enrolment, after surgery (T1), after prosthetic rehabilitation (T2), and 1 year after implant loading (T3). Significant decreases in graft volume (3D) and graft height (2D) from T1 to T3 were observed in all groups (P < 0.05). However, at T2 and T3, graft volume was significantly higher in group B than in groups A and C (P < 0.05), and graft height was significantly higher in group B than in group A (P < 0.05). Bone density increased significantly from T1 to T2 in all groups (P < 0.001). However, bone density was significantly higher in group B than in groups A and C, at T2 and T3 (P < 0.05). No significant correlation between graft volume or height and implant protrusion length or residual bone height was found. In conclusion, 11 autogenous bone and porcine bone resulted in significantly higher graft volume, height, and bone density when compared with autogenous bone or a 11 ratio of autogenous bone and biphasic bone. However the higher graft volume, height, and bone density did not appear to lead to improved outcomes at 1 year of functional loading when compared to the other groups.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article