Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dosimetric impact of stopping power for human bone porosity with dual-energy computed tomography in scanned carbon-ion therapy treatment planning.
Yagi, Masashi; Wakisaka, Yushi; Takeno, Jun; Kanada, Shintaro; Tsubouchi, Toshiro; Hamatani, Noriaki; Maruo, Hiroyasu; Takashina, Masaaki; Ishii, Takayoshi; Kanai, Tatsuaki; Shimizu, Shinichi; Ogawa, Kazuhiko.
Afiliação
  • Yagi M; Department of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan. m.yagi@radonc.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
  • Wakisaka Y; Department of Radiation Technology, Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Osaka, Japan.
  • Takeno J; Department of Radiotherapy, Medical Co. Hakuhokai, Osaka Proton Therapy Clinic, Osaka, Japan.
  • Kanada S; Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • Tsubouchi T; Department of Radiation Technology, Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Osaka, Japan.
  • Hamatani N; Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • Maruo H; Department of Radiation Technology, Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Osaka, Japan.
  • Takashina M; Department of Medical Physics, Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Osaka, Japan.
  • Ishii T; Department of Medical Physics, Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Osaka, Japan.
  • Kanai T; Department of Radiation Technology, Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Osaka, Japan.
  • Shimizu S; Department of Medical Physics, Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Osaka, Japan.
  • Ogawa K; Department of Radiation Technology, Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Osaka, Japan.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 17440, 2024 07 29.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39075135
ABSTRACT
Few reports have documented how the accuracy of stopping power ratio (SPR) prediction for porous bone tissue affects the dose distribution of scanned carbon-ion beam therapy. The estimated SPR based on single-energy computed tomography (SECT) and dual-energy CT (DECT) were compared for the femur of a Rando phantom which simulates the porosity of human bone, NEOBONE which is the hydroxyapatite synthetic bone substitute, and soft tissue samples. Dose differences between SECT and DECT were evaluated for a scanned carbon-ion therapy treatment plan for the Rando phantom. The difference in the water equivalent length was measured to extract the SPR of the examined samples. The differences for SPR estimated from the DECT-SPR conversion were small with - 1.8% and - 3.3% for the Rando phantom femur and NEOBONE, respectively, whereas the differences for SECT-SPR were between 7.6 and 70.7%, illustrating a 1.5-mm shift of the range and a dose difference of 13.3% at maximum point in the evaluation of the dose distribution. This study demonstrated that the DECT-SPR conversion method better estimated the SPR of the porosity of bone tissues than SECT-SPR followed by the accurate range of the carbon-ion beams on carbon-ion dose calculations.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Imagens de Fantasmas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Imagens de Fantasmas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article