Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of joint position sense in active and passive modes with various elbow flexion angles and movement speeds using an isokinetic dynamometer.
Tsai, Yi-Jung; Tsai, Ting-Chien; Chung, Tzu-Chun; Hsiao, Chih-Kun; Tu, Yuan-Kun.
Afiliação
  • Tsai YJ; Department of Medical Research, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Medical College, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Tsai TC; Department of Orthopedics, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan.
  • Chung TC; Department of Orthopedics, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Medical College, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Electronic address: ed105498@edah.org.tw.
  • Hsiao CK; Department of Medical Research, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Medical College, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Tu YK; Department of Orthopedics, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Medical College, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Electronic address: ed100130@edah.org.tw.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract ; 73: 103153, 2024 Jul 26.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39096535
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Joint position sense is the ability to detect body segment position in space and is commonly used to represent proprioceptive performance. The isokinetic dynamometer is frequently used to evaluate elbow joint position sense during active and passive reproduction tasks with various testing protocols. However, few studies have reported the performance of joint position sense under different testing conditions.

OBJECTIVE:

To compare elbow joint position sense between active and passive reproduction tasks under different matching speeds and reference targets.

DESIGN:

A cross-sectional study.

METHODS:

Twenty participants without a history of upper-extremity surgery or neuromuscular diseases that affect the joint position sense of the elbow. Active and passive ipsilateral matching tasks were performed at four movement speeds (0.5°/s, 1°/s, 2°/s, and 4°/s) and three reference targets (elbow flexion at 0°-15°, 45°-60°, and 75°-90°), using an isokinetic dynamometer. The absolute and variable errors of each condition were calculated for comparison.

RESULTS:

In active matching task with elbow flexion of 0°-15°, the absolute error at 0.5°/s was significantly larger than that at 2°/s and 4°/s, while the variable error at 1°/s was significantly larger than that at 2°/s. However, no differences were found at elbow flexion angles of 45°-60° and 75°-90°. Larger absolute errors were found at 4°/s with three testing angles in passive matching task.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study compared the joint position sense errors under various testing conditions in the active and passive reproduction tasks. The movement speeds and target position effects should be considered during evaluation.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article