Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Drug administration errors among anaesthesia providers in South Africa: a cross-sectional descriptive study.
van Wyk, René; Davids, Ryan Alroy.
Afiliação
  • van Wyk R; Department Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Stellenbosch, Parow, Cape Town, 7500, South Africa. rene.potg@gmail.com.
  • Davids RA; Department Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Stellenbosch, Parow, Cape Town, 7500, South Africa.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 24(1): 270, 2024 Aug 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39097708
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Drug administration errors (DAEs) in anaesthesia are common, the aetiology multifactorial and though mostly inconsequential, some lead to substantial harm. The extend of DAEs remain poorly quantified and effective implementation of prevention strategies sparse.

METHOD:

A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted using a peer-reviewed survey questionnaire, circulated to 2217 anaesthetists via a national communication platform. The aim was to determine the self-reported frequency, nature, contributing factors and reporting patterns of DAEs among anaesthesia providers in South Africa.

RESULTS:

Our cohort had a response rate was 18.9%, with 420 individuals populating the questionnaire. 92.5% of surveyed participants have made a DAE and 89.2% a near-miss. Incorrect route of administration, potentially resulting in serious harm, accounted for 8.2% (n = 23/N = 279) of these errors. DAEs mostly reported in cases involving adult patients (80.5%, n = 243/N = 302), receiving a general anaesthetic (71.8%, n = 216/N = 301), where the drug-administrator prepared the drugs themselves (78.7%, n = 218/N = 277), during normal daytime hours (69.9%, n = 202/N = 289) with good lightning conditions (93.0%, n = 265/N = 285). 26% (n = 80/N = 305) of DAEs involved ampoule misidentification, whilst syringe identification error reported in 51.6% (n = 150/N = 291) of cases. DAEs are often not reported (40.3%, n = 114/N = 283), with knowledge of correct reporting procedures lacking. 70.5% (n = 198/N = 281) of DAEs were never discussed with the patient.

CONCLUSIONS:

DAEs in anaesthesia remain prevalent. Known error traps continue to drive these incidents. Implementation of system based preventative strategies are paramount to guard against human error. Efforts should be made to encourage scrupulous reporting and training of anaesthesia providers, with the aim of rendering them proficient and resilient to handle these events.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Anestesia / Anestésicos / Erros de Medicação Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Anestesia / Anestésicos / Erros de Medicação Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article