Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cytomegalovirus immunity in high-risk liver transplant recipients following preemptive antiviral therapy versus prophylaxis.
Zamora, Danniel; Dasgupta, Sayan; Stevens-Ayers, Terry; Edmison, Bradley; Winston, Drew J; Razonable, Raymund R; Mehta, Aneesh K; Lyon, G Marshall; Boeckh, Michael; Singh, Nina; Koelle, David M; Limaye, Ajit P.
Afiliação
  • Zamora D; Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Dasgupta S; Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Stevens-Ayers T; Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Edmison B; Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Winston DJ; Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Razonable RR; Division of Infectious Diseases, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Mehta AK; Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Lyon GM; Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Boeckh M; Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Singh N; Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Koelle DM; Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Limaye AP; Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
JCI Insight ; 9(18)2024 Sep 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39099206
ABSTRACT
CMV-specific T cells, NK cells, and neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) were assessed in a randomized trial of CMV prevention with preemptive antiviral therapy (PET) versus prophylactic antiviral therapy (PRO) in donor-seropositive/recipient-seronegative (D+R-) liver transplant recipients (LTxR) at 100 days (end of intervention) and at 6 and 12 months after transplant. The PET group had significantly increased numbers of circulating polyfunctional T cells, NK cells, and nAbs compared with the PRO group at day 100, and several CMV immune parameters remained significantly higher by 12 months after transplant. Among PET recipients, preceding CMV viremia (vs. no preceding viremia) was associated with significantly higher levels of most CMV immune parameters at day 100. Higher numbers of CMV-specific polyfunctional T cells and NKG2C+ NK cells at day 100 were associated with a decreased incidence of CMV disease in multivariable Cox regression. The strongest associations with protection against CMV disease were with increased numbers of CMV-specific polyfunctional CD4+ T cells, CD3negCD56dimCD57negNKG2Cpos cells, and CD3negCD56dimCD57posNKG2Cpos NK cells. Our results suggest that PET is superior to PRO for CMV disease prevention by allowing low-level CMV replication and associated antigen exposure that is promptly controlled by antiviral therapy and facilitates enhanced CMV protective immunity in D+R- LTxR.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Antivirais / Células Matadoras Naturais / Transplante de Fígado / Infecções por Citomegalovirus / Citomegalovirus Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Antivirais / Células Matadoras Naturais / Transplante de Fígado / Infecções por Citomegalovirus / Citomegalovirus Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article