Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Associations between novel anthropometric indices and the prevalence of gallstones among 6,848 adults: a cross-sectional study.
Zhang, Jie; Liang, Depeng; Xu, Lidong; Liu, Yanhong; Jiang, Shan; Han, Xiaomeng; Wu, Huili; Jiang, Yuanyuan.
Afiliação
  • Zhang J; Department of Gastroenterology, Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
  • Liang D; Henan Provincial Medicine Key Laboratory of Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Zhengzhou, China.
  • Xu L; Zhengzhou Key Laboratory of Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis, Treatment and Research, Zhengzhou, China.
  • Liu Y; Department of Gastroenterology, Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
  • Jiang S; Henan Provincial Medicine Key Laboratory of Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Zhengzhou, China.
  • Han X; Zhengzhou Key Laboratory of Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis, Treatment and Research, Zhengzhou, China.
  • Wu H; Department of Gastroenterology, Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
  • Jiang Y; Henan Provincial Medicine Key Laboratory of Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Zhengzhou, China.
Front Nutr ; 11: 1428488, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39104753
ABSTRACT

Background:

Traditional anthropometric measures, including body mass index (BMI), are insufficient for evaluating gallstone risk. This study investigated the association between novel anthropometric indices and gallstone risk among 6,848 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in the United States.

Methods:

Measures calculated included weight (WT), BMI, waist circumference (WC), waist-to-height ratio (WtHR), conicity index (CI), A Body Shape Index (ABSI), Body Roundness Index (BRI), Abdominal Volume Index (AVI), and Weight-adjusted Waist Index (WWI). Logistic regression and smooth curve fitting assessed the relationships between these indices and gallstones, complemented by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to evaluate their discriminative power.

Results:

The results indicated significant differences between study groups, with a positive and independent correlation identified between gallstones and all measures except ABSI. Specifically, per 1 SD increase in WC, WT, BMI, WtHR, and AVI was associated with a 57%, 59%, 52%, 53%, and 53% increased risk of gallstones, respectively. Dose-response analysis confirmed a positive correlation between these indices and gallstone risk. ROC analysis highlighted WtHR and BRI as having superior discriminative abilities (AUC = 0.6703). Further, among participants with a BMI < 30 kg/m2, elevated levels of WT, WtHR, CI, BRI, and WWI significantly increased the risk of gallstones (P < 0.001). Likewise, elevated BMI heightened the risk at low levels of WT, WC, WtHR, BRI, AVI, and CI (P < 0.001).

Conclusion:

This study supports the positive association between various anthropometric indicators and gallstones, recommending that newer anthropometric indices be considered more extensively to enhance gallstone prevention and treatment strategies.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article