Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Human movement strategies in uncertain environments: A synergy-based approach to the stability-agility tradeoff.
Naik, Anvesh; Iqbal, Ruchika; Hélie, Sébastien; Ambike, Satyajit.
Afiliação
  • Naik A; Department of Health and Kinesiology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
  • Iqbal R; Department of Health and Kinesiology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
  • Hélie S; Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
  • Ambike S; Department of Health and Kinesiology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA. Electronic address: sambike@purdue.edu.
Hum Mov Sci ; 97: 103259, 2024 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39110998
ABSTRACT
Humans frequently prepare for agile movements by decreasing stability. This facilitates transitions between movements but increases vulnerability to external disruptions. Therefore, humans might weigh the risk of disruption against the gain in agility and scale their stability to the likelihood of having to perform an agility-demanding action. We used the theory of motor synergies to investigate how humans manage this stability-agility tradeoff under uncertainty. This theory has long quantified stability using the synergy index, and reduction in stability before movement transitions using anticipatory synergy adjustment (ASA). However, the impact of uncertainty - whether a quick action should be executed or inhibited - on ASA is unknown. Furthermore, the impact of ASA on execution and inhibition of the action is unclear. We combined multi-finger, isometric force production with the go/no-go paradigm. Thirty participants performed constant force (no-go task), rapid force pulse (go task), and randomized go and no-go trials (go/no-go task) in response to visual cues. We measured the pre-cue finger forces and computed ASA using the uncontrolled manifold method and quantified the spatio-temporal features of the force after the visual cue. We expected ASA in both go/no-go and go tasks, but larger ASA for the latter. Surprisingly, we observed ASA only for the go task. For the go/no-go task, 53% of participants increased stability before the cue. The high stability hindered performance, leading to increased errors in no-go trials and lower peak forces in go trials. These results align with the stability-agility tradeoff. It is puzzling why some participants increased stability even though 80% of the trials demanded agility. This study indicates that individual differences in the effect of task uncertainty and motor inhibition on ASA is unexplored in motor synergy theory and presents a method for further development.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Desempenho Psicomotor Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Desempenho Psicomotor Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article