Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Variability of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with atrial fibrillation and determination of exercise responders to high-intensity interval training and moderate-to-vigorous intensity continuous training.
Terada, Tasuku; Keir, Daniel A; Murias, Juan M; Vidal-Almela, Sol; Buckley, John; Reed, Jennifer L.
Afiliação
  • Terada T; University of Nottingham, School of Life Sciences, Nottingham, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; TASUKU.TERADA@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK.
  • Keir DA; University of Western Ontario, Kinesiology, London, Ontario, Canada; dkeir@uwo.ca.
  • Murias JM; Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Faculty of Kinesiology, Doha, Qatar; jmurias@hbku.edu.qa.
  • Vidal-Almela S; University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Exercise Physiology and Cardiovascular Health Lab, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Buckley J; Institut du Savoir Montfort, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; svidalalmela@ottawaheart.ca.
  • Reed JL; Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; j.p.buckley@keele.ac.uk.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39116459
ABSTRACT
Disabling atrial fibrillation (AF)-related symptoms and different testing settings may influence day-to-day cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) measurements, which can affect exercise prescription for high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-to-vigorous intensity continuous training (M-VICT) and their outcomes. This study examined the reliability of CPET in patients with AF and assessed the proportion of participants achieving minimal detectable changes (MDC) in peak oxygen consumption (V̇O2peak) following HIIT and M-VICT. Participants were randomized into HIIT or M-VICT after completing two baseline CPETs one with cardiac stress technologists (CPETdiag) and the other with a research team of exercise specialists (CPETresearch). Additional CPET was completed following 12 weeks of twice-weekly training. Reliability of CPETdiag and CPETresearch was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and dependent t-tests. The MDC score was calculated for V̇O2peak using a reliable change index. The proportion of participants achieving MDC was compared between HIIT and M-VICT using chi-square analysis. Eighteen participants (69±7 years, 33% females) completed two baseline CPETs. ICC was significant for all measured variables. However, peak power output (POpeak 124±40 vs. 148±40 watts, p<0.001) and HR (HRpeak 136±22 vs. 148±30 bpm, p=0.023) were significantly greater in CPETresearch than CPETdiag. Few participants achieved MDC in V̇O2peak (5.6 mL/kg/min) with no difference between HIIT (0%) and M-VICT (10.0%, p=0.244). POpeak and HRpeak differed significantly in patients with AF when CPETs were repeated under different settings. Caution must be practiced when prescribing exercise intensity based on these measures as under-prescription may increase the number of exercise non-responders.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article