Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An Analysis of Computed Tomography Diagnostic Reference Levels in India Compared to Other Countries.
Malik, Maajid Mohi Ud Din; Alqahtani, Mansour; Hadadi, Ibrahim; AlQhtani, Abdullah G M; Alqarni, Abdullah.
Afiliação
  • Malik MMUD; Dr. D.Y. Patil School of Allied Health Sciences, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Sant Tukaram Nagar, Pimpri, Pune 411018, MH, India.
  • Alqahtani M; Department of Radiological Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Najran University, Najran 61441, Saudi Arabia.
  • Hadadi I; Department of Radiological Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia.
  • AlQhtani AGM; Radiology and Medical Imaging Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.
  • Alqarni A; Radiology and Medical Imaging Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 14(15)2024 Jul 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39125460
ABSTRACT
Computed Tomography (CT) is vital for diagnosing and monitoring medical conditions. However, increased usage raises concerns about patient radiation exposure. Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) aim to minimize radiation doses in CT imaging. This study examines CT DRLs in India compared to other countries to identify optimization opportunities. A literature review was conducted to gather data from published studies, guidelines, and regulatory authorities. Findings show significant international variations in CT DRLs, with differences up to 50%. In India, DRLs also vary significantly across states. For head CT exams, Indian DRLs are generally 20-30% lower than international standards (27-47 mGy vs. 60 mGy). Conversely, for abdominal CT scans, Indian DRLs are 10-15% higher (12-16 mGy vs. 13 mGy). Factors influencing DRL variations include equipment differences, imaging protocols, patient demographics, and regulatory conditions. Dose-optimization techniques like automatic exposure control and iterative reconstruction can reduce radiation exposure by 25-60% while maintaining image quality. Comparative data highlight best practices, such as the United Kingdom's 30% reduction in CT doses from 1984 to 1995 via DRL implementation. This study suggests that adopting similar practices in India could reduce radiation doses by 20-40% for common CT procedures, promoting responsible CT usage and minimizing patient exposure.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article