Assessment of hearing dysfunction in patients with Graves' disease and thyroid eye disease without or with teprotumumab.

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE Thyroid eye disease (TED) negatively impacts quality of life. TED occurs predominantly in Graves' disease (GD). Teprotumumab improves TED but concern for hearing adverse events (AEs) has emerged. Hearing dysfunction is reported in thyroid autoimmune disease but the background prevalence in GD/TED without teprotumumab remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To quantify ear-related diagnostic codes/hearing AEs in GD, TED, and patients receiving teprotumumab by examining medical claims and clinical trials. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Deidentified claims for ear/labyrinth-related ICD-10 codes (KOMODO®) were examined in GD patients without TED, and TED patients without/with teprotumumab treatment. Hearing AE incidence/severity was evaluated in teprotumumab clinical trials. Graves' Ophthalmopathy QOL (GO-QOL) scores were compared in teprotumumab TED trial patients without/with hearing AEs. RESULTS: GD (469,720), TED (38,566) and teprotumumab-treated (967) patients were identified in the claims database. Ear-related codes (including those not specific for hearing) occurred in 24% GD, 33% TED, and 32% teprotumumab-treated patients. "Sensorineural hearing loss bilateral" was most frequent 32,961/469,720 (7%) GD, 4,279/38,566 (11.1%) TED, and 104/967 (10.8%) teprotumumab patients. Pre-teprotumumab use,165 (17.1%) patients had ear-related codes while 98 (10.1%) had new ear-related codes post-treatment.Eight teprotumumab oncology trials revealed 8.1% (51/633) had Ear/Labyrinth Disorders with 2.1% (13) considered study-drug-related and 3.8% (24) hearing impairment/tinnitus-related AEs, with 1.3% (8) considered teprotumumab-related. Similar rates occurred in TED trials.GO-QOL improved in teprotumumab-treated patients without/with hearing AEs. Incidence/severity was consistent across patients with chronic and acute TED. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses indicate similar occurrence of hearing claims in patients with GD/TED alone as following teprotumumab treatment. Future analyses of incremental hearing risk from teprotumumab should utilize a priori study designs accounting for background hearing dysfunction in patients with GD/TED.