Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of air quality in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania subway.
Karim, Anjum Shahina; Malone, Maeve; Bruno, Alex; Eggler, Aimee L; Posner, Michael A; Shakya, Kabindra M.
Afiliação
  • Karim AS; Department of Geography and the Environment, Villanova University, Villanova, PA, USA.
  • Malone M; Department of Geography and the Environment, Villanova University, Villanova, PA, USA.
  • Bruno A; Department of Geography and the Environment, Villanova University, Villanova, PA, USA.
  • Eggler AL; Department of Chemistry, Villanova University, Villanova, PA, USA.
  • Posner MA; Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Villanova University, Villanova, PA, USA.
  • Shakya KM; Department of Geography and the Environment, Villanova University, Villanova, PA, USA. kabindra.shakya@villanova.edu.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39143148
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Subways are popular and efficient modes of transportation in cities. However, people are exposed to high levels of particulate matter (PM) in subways. Subway air quality in the United States has been investigated in a few cities, but data is lacking on simultaneous measurement of several pollutants, especially ultrafine particles (UFP) and black carbon (BC), in combination with different size fractions of PM.

OBJECTIVES:

The goals of this study are to assess air quality in a belowground subway and compare it with outdoor ambient levels, to examine temporal variability of PM in the subway, and to analyze the correlation between PM and BC.

METHODS:

Particulate matter of varying sizes (PM1, PM2.5, PM10), UFP, and BC were measured using DustTrak, nanoparticle detector, and micro aethalometer, respectively. Measurements were made at the belowground subway platform and the aboveground street level at 15th Street subway station in Philadelphia during summer 2022.

RESULTS:

Belowground mean PM1, PM2.5, and PM10 were 112.2 ± 61.3 µg/m3, 120 ± 65.5 µg/m3, and 182.1 ± 132 µg/m3, respectively, which were 5.4, 5.7, and 7.6 times higher than the respective aboveground street levels. The UFP lung deposited surface area (LDSA) (59.4 ± 36.2 µm2/cm3) and BC (9.5 ± 5.4 µg/m3) belowground were 1.7 times and 10.7 times higher than the aboveground. The pollutant concentration varied from day-to-day on both the locations. A higher positive correlation was found between the belowground BC and PM2.5 (r = 0.51, p < 0.05) compared to the aboveground (r = 0.16, p < 0.05). IMPACT This study showed high levels of particulate matter exposure at a belowground subway station in Philadelphia. Particulate matter levels were about 5 to 8 times higher at belowground subway station than the corresponding aboveground street level. Higher levels were also observed for UFP lung deposited surface area (LDSA), while black carbon levels showed the highest concentration at the belowground level by a factor of ten compared to the aboveground level. The study shows the need for air quality management at belowground subways to reduce particulate matter exposure for the commuters.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article