Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A refined ICD-10 diagnoses-based approach for retrospective analysis of potential palliative care need and coverage in claims data of deceased.
Slotina, Ekaterina; Ditscheid, Bianka; Meissner, Franziska; Marschall, Ursula; Wedding, Ulrich; Freytag, Antje.
Afiliação
  • Slotina E; Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
  • Ditscheid B; Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
  • Meissner F; Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
  • Marschall U; Barmer Institute for Health Systems Research, Berlin, Wuppertal, Germany.
  • Wedding U; Department of Palliative Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
  • Freytag A; Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
SAGE Open Med ; 12: 20503121241269599, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39144525
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

ICD-10-based approaches often provide the basis for retrospective estimation of potential palliative care need. Applying the ICD-10-based Murtagh et al. classification from 2014 (Murtagh classification), developed using mortality data, to administrative claims data leads to inconsistencies in estimating palliative care need. The aim of the study was to refine the classification for palliative care need estimation in deceased individuals with cancer and non-cancer diagnosis.

Methods:

A retrospective population-based study comparing Murtagh classification to a new ICD-10-based classification (revised by expert opinion) was conducted using outpatient and inpatient claims data, including billing codes for palliative care. Palliative care need was estimated for diagnoses groups and was contrasted with palliative care utilization rates in the last year of life. Our dataset included records of 417,405 individuals who deceased in 2016-2019.

Results:

Out of individuals deceased in 2019 (n = 117,436), 81.4% had at least one diagnosis from the new classification, while 97.0% had at least one diagnosis from the Murtagh classification. Classification revision thus identified fewer individuals as potentially in need of palliative care. Among individuals with cancer, 70.7% (vs. 55.7% via Murtagh classification) received palliative care. In non-cancer subgroups, the utilization rate was considerably lower, with a maximum of 36.7% (vs. 33.7% via Murtagh classification) in 2019. Similar results were observed for the other years.

Conclusion:

Compared to the ICD10-based Murtagh classification, the revised ICD-10-based classification enables more realistic estimations if the cause of death is unavailable and reveals higher rates of palliative care coverage and differences especially in cancer versus non-cancer diseases. German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00024133).
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article