Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Facedown Positioning in Macular Hole Surgery: A Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.
Raimondi, Raffaele; Tzoumas, Nikolaos; Toh, Steven; Sarohia, Gurkaran S; Phillips, Mark R; Chaudhary, Varun; Steel, David H.
Afiliação
  • Raimondi R; Newcastle Eye Centre, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Tzoumas N; Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Sunderland Eye Infirmary, Sunderland, UK.
  • Toh S; Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Sarohia GS; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.
  • Phillips MR; Department of Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada.
  • Chaudhary V; Department of Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada.
  • Steel DH; Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Sunderland Eye Infirmary, Sunderland, UK. Electronic address: David.steel@ncl.ac.uk.
Ophthalmology ; 2024 Aug 13.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39147105
ABSTRACT
TOPIC To assess the anatomical and visual effects of facedown positioning (FDP) advice in patients undergoing vitrectomy with gas tamponade for idiopathic full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs), and to explore differential treatment effects by macular hole size and FDP duration. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The necessity and duration of FDP for FTMH closure remain contentious, with no consensus guidelines.

METHODS:

Prospectively registered systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing FDP to no FDP (nFDP) across the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases and clinical trial registries from January 2000 to March 2023 (CRD42023395152). All adults with idiopathic FTMHs undergoing vitrectomy with gas tamponade were included. The main outcomes were primary macular hole closure and post-operative visual acuity at 6 months or nearest time point.

RESULTS:

Of 8 eligible trials, 5 contributed IPD for 379 eyes and were included in our analysis. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for primary closure with FDP versus nFDP was 2.41 (95% CI 0.98 to 5.93, P = 0.06) [GRADE Low], translating to a relative risk (RR) of 1.08 (1.00 to 1.11) and a number needed to treat (NNT) of 15. The FDP group exhibited a mean improvement in post-operative visual acuity of -0.08 logMAR (-0.13 to -0.02, P = 0.006) [GRADE Low] compared to the nFDP group. Benefits were more certain in participants with larger holes of minimum linear diameter ≥ 400 µm adjusted OR for closure ranged from 1.13 to 10.12 (P = 0.030) (NNT 12), with a mean visual acuity improvement of -0.18 to -0.01 logMAR (P = 0.022). Each additional day of FDP was associated with improved odds of anatomical success (adjusted OR 1.02 to 1.41, RR 1.00 to 1.02, P = 0.026) and visual acuity improvement (-0.02 logMAR, -0.03 to -0.01, P = 0.002), possibly plateauing at 3 days.

CONCLUSION:

This study provides low certainty evidence that FDP improves the anatomical and visual outcomes of macular hole surgery modestly and indicate that the effect may be more substantial for macular holes exceeding 400 µm. The findings support recommending FDP for patients with macular holes exceeding 400 µm pending further investigation.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article