Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Perceptual anchoring: Children with dyslexia benefit less than controls from contextual repetitions in speech processing.
Männel, Claudia; Ramos-Sanchez, Jessica; Obrig, Hellmuth; Ahissar, Merav; Schaadt, Gesa.
Afiliação
  • Männel C; Department of Audiology and Phoniatrics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; Department of Neuropsychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Stephanstr. 1a, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, University
  • Ramos-Sanchez J; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Thomas van Aquinostraat 4, 6525 GD Nijmegen, Netherlands.
  • Obrig H; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 16, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Stephanstr. 1a, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
  • Ahissar M; ELSC Center for Brain Research, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
  • Schaadt G; Department of Neuropsychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Stephanstr. 1a, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Schwendenerstr. 33, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 166: 117-128, 2024 Aug 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39153460
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Individuals with dyslexia perceive and utilize statistical features in the auditory input deficiently. The present study investigates whether affected children also benefit less from repeating context tones as perceptual anchors for subsequent speech processing.

METHODS:

In an event-related potential study, eleven-year-old children with dyslexia (n = 21) and without dyslexia (n = 20) heard syllable pairs, with the first syllable either receiving a constant pitch (anchor) or variable pitch (no-anchor), while second syllables were identical across conditions.

RESULTS:

Children with and without dyslexia showed smaller auditory P2 responses to constant-pitch versus variable-pitch first syllables, while only control children additionally showed smaller N1 and faster P1 responses. This suggests less automatic processing of anchor repetitions in dyslexia. For the second syllables, both groups showed faster P2 responses following anchor than no-anchor first syllables, but only controls additionally showed smaller P2 responses.

CONCLUSIONS:

Children with and without dyslexia show differences in anchor effects. While both groups seem to allocate less attention to speech stimuli after contextual repetitions, children with dyslexia display less facilitation in speech processing from acoustic anchors.

SIGNIFICANCE:

Altered anchoring in the linguistic domain may contribute to the difficulties of individuals with dyslexia in establishing long-term representations of speech.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article