Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Volumetric Analyses of Dysmorphic Maxillofacial Structures Using 3D Surface-Based Approaches: A Scoping Review.
Cappella, Annalisa; Gaffuri, Francesca; Yang, Josh; Tartaglia, Francesco Carlo; Solazzo, Riccardo; Inchingolo, Francesco; Tartaglia, Gianluca Martino; Sforza, Chiarella.
Afiliação
  • Cappella A; U.O. Laboratory of Applied Morphology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy.
  • Gaffuri F; Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.
  • Yang J; Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
  • Tartaglia FC; Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy.
  • Solazzo R; Harvard School of Dental Medicine (HSDM), Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
  • Inchingolo F; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy.
  • Tartaglia GM; LAFAS (Laboratory of Functional Anatomy of the Stomatognathic System), Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.
  • Sforza C; Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.
J Clin Med ; 13(16)2024 Aug 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39200882
ABSTRACT
Background/

Objectives:

Three-dimensional (3D) analysis of maxillofacial structures in dysmorphic patients offers clinical advantages over 2D analysis due to its high accuracy and precision in measuring many morphological parameters. Currently, no reliable gold standard exists for calculating 3D volumetric measurements of maxillofacial structures when captured by 3D surface imaging techniques. The aim of this scoping review is to provide an overview of the scientific literature related to 3D surface imaging methods used for volumetric analysis of the dysmorphic maxillofacial structures of patients affected by CL/P or other syndromes and to provide an update on the existing protocols, methods, and, when available, reference data.

Methods:

A total of 17 papers selected according to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were reviewed for the qualitative analysis out of more than 4500 articles published between 2002 and 2024 that were retrieved from the main electronic scientific databases according to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A qualitative synthesis of the protocols used for the selection of the anatomical areas of interest and details on the methods used for the calculation of their volume was completed.

Results:

The results suggest a great degree of heterogeneity between the reviewed studies in all the aspects analysed (patient population, anatomical structure, area selection, and volume calculation), which prevents any chance of direct comparison between the reported volumetric data.

Conclusions:

Our qualitative analysis revealed dissimilarities in the procedures specified in the studies, highlighting the need to develop uniform methods and protocols and the need for comparative studies to verify the validity of methods in order to achieve high levels of scientific evidence, homogeneity of volumetric data, and clinical consensus on the methods to use for 3D volumetric surface-based analysis.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article