Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dosimetric benefits of customised mouth-bite for head neck cancer patients undergoing modern proton therapy - An audit.
Nangia, Sapna; Gaikwad, Utpal; Joshua, Patrick; Mookaiah, Minnal; Burela, Nagarjuna; Thirumalai, Anusha; Chilukuri, Srinivas; Gayen, Sanjib; Karra, Ashok Reddy; Sharma, Dayananda S.
Afiliação
  • Nangia S; Dept of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Gaikwad U; Dept of Radiation Oncology, Krupamai Cancer Hospital, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.
  • Joshua P; Dept of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Mookaiah M; Dept of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Burela N; Dept of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Thirumalai A; Dept of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Chilukuri S; Dept of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Gayen S; Dept of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Karra AR; Dept of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Sharma DS; Dept of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai 600041, Tamil Nadu, India.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39224831
ABSTRACT
Background and

aims:

Proton therapy (PRT) for Head Neck Cancer (HNC), in view of the Bragg peak, spares critical structures like oral mucosa better than IMRT. In PRT, mouth-bites, besides immobilising and separating mucosal surfaces, may also negate the end-of-range effect. We retrospectively analysed the details and dosimetric impact of mouth-bites in PRT for HNC. Materials and

methods:

The data of consecutive HNC patients treated with IMPT from May 2020 to August 2022 were studied retrospectively. Details of the mouth-bite used, compliance and resultant mucosal separation were noted. Further analysis, restricted to previously unirradiated patients, comprised volumetric dosimetric data pertaining to the mouth-bite and distal mucosal surfaces. High LET zones, corresponding to 6-12 keV/micron, for mouth-bite doses above 30 Gy, were recalculated from existing plans.

Results:

A mouth-bite was used in 69 of 80 consecutively treated patients, ranging from 8 to 42 mm in thickness, and 12 to 52 mm in the resultant mucosal sparing. In 42 patients in whom the mouth-bite V 32 Gy was > 0, median Dmean, absolute V32, V39, V50 and V60 GyE (Gray Equivalent) of the mouth bite was 35.65 GyE (Range 2.65 - 60 GyE), 10 cc (Range 0.1 - 32 cc), 7.6 cc (Range 0.1 - 30.8 cc), 5.7 cc (Range 0.2 - 29.2 cc) and 1.45 cc (Range 0.2 - 18.1 cc) respectively, all significantly more than the spared adjacent mucosal surface. In absence of a mouth-bite, the spared mucosa would have at least partially received the high dose received by the mouth-bite. High LET zones were noted in 12 of 48 mouth-bites.

Conclusion:

In PRT for HNC, mouth-bites play a vital role in improving the sparing of mucosa outside the target.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article