Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of cut-out rescanning protocol on the accuracy of digital impressions in convergent implants positioned at varying depths: An in vitro study.
Ansarifard, Elham; Mosaddad, Seyed Ali; Zabihi, Mohammad; Taghva, Masumeh.
Afiliação
  • Ansarifard E; Nanomedicine and Nanobiology Research Center, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Mosaddad SA; Department of Research Analytics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Bucofacial Prostheses, Faculty of Odontology, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
  • Zabihi M; Student Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Taghva M; Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. Electronic address: semosadd@ucm.es.
J Dent ; : 105325, 2024 Sep 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39237076
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study aimed to assess the effect of the "cut-out rescan" strategy on the accuracy of intraoral digital scans from 25° convergent implants positioned at two distinct depths. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Two customized models were fabricated, each designated to receive two posterior converged implant fixtures one at a depth of 1 mm and the other at a depth of 4 mm. Initially, the models were scanned as reference casts using a lab scanner. The test group was involved in scanning the 1-mm and 4-mm implant models using an intraoral scanner in the following order (1) scanning the 1-mm (T1; n=10) and (2) 4-mm (T4; n=10) implant groups with scan bodies connected to both fixtures in each model; (3) cut-out rescan (COR) in the 1-mm (COR1; n=10) and (4) 4-mm (COR4; n=10) models, leading to 40 digital files in standard tessellation language format. The mean absolute deviation (MAD), in terms of trueness and precision, between the experimental and control scans was assessed through the alignment of their respective datasets using three-dimensional analysis software. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Levene's tests were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS:

The COR4 group exhibited the highest MAD, indicative of both trueness and precision (Mean ±SD 55.659 ±34.802). In contrast, the T1 group demonstrated the lowest MAD (Mean ±SD 43.225 ±19.237). However, the ANOVA analysis showed no significant influence of depth (P=0.506) or type of scan (P=0.442) on the MAD. Precision also did not differ significantly across groups (P=0.071).

CONCLUSIONS:

The cut-out rescan approach demonstrated an accuracy comparable to that of the one-time scan method. CLINICAL

SIGNIFICANCE:

Digital intraoral scanning provides clinicians with a range of tools to navigate challenging conditions in which conventional methods may prove difficult, such as cases involving angled adjacent implants. In these scenarios, the cut-out rescan tool serves as a valuable resource, aiding clinicians in overcoming the challenges associated with impression-making owing to the convergence of placed implants.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article