Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
"Because that is the right thing to do": A focus group study of Australian expert perspectives on offering smoking cessation support in lung cancer screening.
Harrison, Nathan J; Dodd, Rachael H; Sharman, Ashleigh R; Marshall, Henry M; Stone, Emily; Rhee, Joel J; Yap, Mei Ling; McCullough, Sue; Paul, Christine; Bowden, Jacqueline A; Bonevski, Billie; Rankin, Nicole M.
Afiliação
  • Harrison NJ; Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Dodd RH; NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
  • Sharman AR; National Centre for Education and Training on Addiction (NCETA), Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Marshall HM; The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between Cancer Council NSW and The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Stone E; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Rhee JJ; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Yap ML; NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
  • McCullough S; University of Queensland Thoracic Research Centre and Department of Thoracic Medicine, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Queensland, Australia.
  • Paul C; Department of Thoracic Medicine and Lung Transplantation, St. Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Bowden JA; School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Bonevski B; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Rankin NM; Discipline of General Practice, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 2024 Sep 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39243356
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Lung cancer screening (LCS) trials, targeting people with smoking history, have demonstrated reduced mortality. How to optimally embed evidence-based smoking cessation support in LCS, including in Australia, needs to be better understood. We sought experts' perspectives to identify potential barriers and effective implementation strategies.

METHODS:

Perceptions of providing smoking cessation support in LCS were elicited in 24 focus groups and three individual interviews with clinicians, cancer screening program managers/policymakers, and researchers during 2021. We conducted framework analysis and mapped key topics to the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

RESULTS:

Experts (N=84 participants) strongly supported capitalising on an "opportune time" for smoking cessation and new LCS participant contact opportunities throughout the screening and assessment pathway. Many advocated for adapting existing cessation resources to the LCS setting and providing support without participant costs. Experts generally considered referral alone to established programs (e.g., telephone Quitline) as insufficient, but likely helpful in follow-up, and dedicated cessation specialist roles as essential. Broader cessation messaging (via mass media/community channels) was also suggested to reinforce individualised support. Experts described inherent alignment, and an ethical responsibility, to deliver smoking cessation as a core LCS component. It was suggested that LCS-eligible participants' varied experiences of stigma, health literacy, and motivation, be considered in cessation supports. Primary care support and individualised interventions were suggested to facilitate implementation.

CONCLUSIONS:

Experts considered smoking cessation support essential in LCS. The expert-identified and multi-level implementation strategies described here can directly inform smoking cessation-specific planning for Australia's forthcoming National LCS Program. IMPLICATIONS The international literature includes few examples considering how best to provide smoking cessation support within a lung cancer screening (LCS) program in advance of program commencement. Our analysis, using the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, is one of the first to explore experts' perspectives within this context. Experts identified multiple implementation barriers to providing smoking cessation support within and outside of an Australian LCS program, including key work infrastructure barriers, and advocated for providing tailored interventions within this program. Our foundational work in a new targeted screening program's pre-implementation phase will allow international comparisons to be made.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article