Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of a Goldilocks work intervention to promote musculoskeletal health among industrial workers - A cluster randomized controlled trial.
Fritz Lerche, Anders; Erik Mathiassen, Svend; Lund Rasmussen, Charlotte; Straker, Leon; Holtermann, Andreas; Søgaard, Karen.
Afiliação
  • Fritz Lerche A; The National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Park Allé 105, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark. Electronic address: afl@nfa.dk.
  • Erik Mathiassen S; Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Occupational Health Science and Psychology, University of Gävle, 80176 Gävle, Sweden.
  • Lund Rasmussen C; School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.
  • Straker L; School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.
  • Holtermann A; The National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Park Allé 105, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark.
  • Søgaard K; Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark.
J Safety Res ; 90: 392-401, 2024 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39251295
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Industrial workers with physically demanding work have increased risk of musculoskeletal pain. The present 12-week Goldilocks Work intervention aimed to organize work among industrial workers to comprise a 'just right' ergonomic balance of physical behaviors (i.e., sit, stand and active) intended to promote musculoskeletal health. The paper investigates the effectiveness of the intervention in reducing low back pain after work.

METHODS:

83 workers across 28 workteams in a biotech organization were recruited. Workteams were randomly allocated to receive the intervention or work as usual (control). Intervention workteams implemented the Goldilocks Work planning tool to organize their work tasks towards a predefined 'just right' ergonomic balance (i.e., composition of 60% sitting, 30% standing, 10% active work and hourly task alternation). The primary outcome was low back pain intensity. Secondary outcomes were bodily pain, fatigue, physical exertion, productivity and energy after work measured in the survey, and composition and alternations of physical behaviors measured using wearable sensors.

RESULTS:

The intervention was delivered almost as planned, with good quality and high adherence among most workteams. However, the intervention did not change physical behaviors towards the intended 'just right' ergonomic balance. No significant reduction in low back pain (0.07, CI 95% -0.68; 0.82), bodily pain (0.10, CI 95% -0.57; 0.76), tiredness (-0.53, CI 95% -1.24; 0.19), physical exertion (-0.18, CI 95% -0.83; 0.48), or improvement in energy (0.39, CI 95% -1.02; 0.23) or productivity (-0.03, CI 95% -0.77; 0.72) were found.

CONCLUSION:

This Goldilocks Work intervention did not promote musculoskeletal health among industrial workers and did not change physical behaviors as intended. Thus, more research is needed into implementation strategies to change physical behaviors during productive work towards an evidence-based 'just right' ergonomic balance.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Saúde Ocupacional / Dor Lombar / Ergonomia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Saúde Ocupacional / Dor Lombar / Ergonomia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article