Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Association between removable prosthesis-wearing and pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lim, Tong Wah; Li, Kar Yan; Burrow, Michael Francis; McGrath, Colman.
Afiliação
  • Lim TW; Division of Restorative Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
  • Li KY; Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Sai Ying Pun, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
  • Burrow MF; Division of Restorative Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
  • McGrath C; Division of Applied Oral Sciences and Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR. mcgrathc@hku.hk.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 1061, 2024 Sep 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39261813
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

A high burden of respiratory pathogens colonizing removable prosthesis surfaces suggests the potential of association between removable prosthesis-wearing and respiratory infections. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the evidence from clinical studies concerning the association between removable prosthesis-wearing and respiratory infections.

METHODS:

Clinical studies that reported respiratory infections associated with adult patients wearing removable prostheses in any centers (hospitals and nursing homes) or communities were included. Literature was searched across five electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus) to 28 May 2024. An additional search was performed for unpublished trials and references cited in related studies. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was employed for the quality assessment. The certainty assessment was established using GRADE. The results were pooled using a frequentist random-effects meta-analysis and the odds ratios generated.

RESULTS:

A total of 1143 articles were identified. Thirteen articles had full-text articles screening and an additional two articles were added through reference linkage. Ultimately, six non-randomized clinical studies reporting various types of pneumonia contributed to this review. Overall odds of having pneumonia among prosthesis wearers were 1.43 (95% CI 0.76 to 2.69) and 1.27 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.46) using the random- and fixed-effects models, respectively. The heterogeneity in the meta-analysis was substantial. In subgroup analysis according to the study design, the heterogeneity within prospective studies was much reduced, I2 = 0% (p = 0.355). The certainty of the evidence evaluated using the GRADE approach was low to very low evidence for prosthesis wearers developing pneumonia based on studies.

CONCLUSIONS:

There was no conclusive evidence from the non-randomized clinical studies supporting whether prosthesis-wearing is a risk factor for pneumonia based on outcomes from this review.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pneumonia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pneumonia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article