Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimizing electrical efficacy of leadless cardiac resynchronization therapy and leadless left ventricular septal pacing: Insights on left and right ventricular activation from electrocardiographic imaging.
Wijesuriya, Nadeev; Strocchi, Marina; Elliott, Mark; Mehta, Vishal; De Vere, Felicity; Howell, Sandra; Mannakkara, Nilanka; Sidhu, Baldeep S; Kwan, Jane; Bosco, Paolo; Niederer, Steven A; Rinaldi, Christopher A.
Afiliação
  • Wijesuriya N; King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Strocchi M; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Elliott M; King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Mehta V; Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • De Vere F; King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Howell S; Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Mannakkara N; King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Sidhu BS; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Kwan J; King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Bosco P; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Niederer SA; King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Rinaldi CA; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Heart Rhythm O2 ; 5(8): 551-560, 2024 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39263609
ABSTRACT

Background:

Leadless cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an emerging heart failure treatment. An implanted electrode delivers lateral or septal endocardial left ventricular (LV) pacing (LVP) upon detection of a right ventricular (RV) pacing stimulus from a coimplanted device, thus generating biventricular pacing (BiVP). Electrical efficacy data regarding this therapy, particularly leadless LV septal pacing (LVSP) for potential conduction system capture, are limited.

Objectives:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acute performance of leadless CRT using electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi) and assess the optimal pacing modality (OPM) of LVSP on the basis of RV and LV activation.

Methods:

Ten WiSE-CRT recipients underwent an ECGi study testing RV pacing, BiVP, LVP only, and LVP with an optimized atrioventricular delay (LV-OPT). BiV, LV, and RV activation times (shortest time taken to activate 90% of the ventricles [BIVAT-90], shortest time taken to activate 95% of the LV, and shortest time taken to activate 90% of the RV) plus LV and BiV dyssynchrony index (standard deviation of LV activation times and standard deviation of all activation times) were calculated from reconstructed epicardial electrograms. The individual OPM yielding the greatest improvement from baseline was determined.

Results:

BiVP generated a 23.7% improvement in BiVAT-90 (P = .002). An improvement of 43.3% was observed at the OPM (P = .0001), primarily through reductions in shortest time taken to activate 90% of the RV. At the OPM, BiVAT-90 improved in patients with lateral (43.3%; P = .0001; n = 5) and septal (42.4%; P = .009; n = 5) LV implants. The OPM varied by individual. LVP and LV-OPT were mostly superior in patients with LVSP, and in those with sinus rhythm and left bundle branch block (n = 4).

Conclusion:

Leadless CRT significantly improves acute ECGi-derived activation and dyssynchrony metrics. Using an individualized OPM improves efficacy in selected patients. Effective LVSP is feasible, with fusion pacing at LV-OPT mitigating the potential deleterious effects on RV activation.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article