Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence-assisted caries detection: a clinical evaluation.
Zhang, Jing-Wen; Fan, Jie; Zhao, Fang-Bing; Ma, Bing'er; Shen, Xiao-Qing; Geng, Yuan-Ming.
Afiliação
  • Zhang JW; Department of Stomatology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 253 Gongyedadao Road, Guangzhou, 510282, China.
  • Fan J; School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
  • Zhao FB; Department of Stomatology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 253 Gongyedadao Road, Guangzhou, 510282, China.
  • Ma B; Department of Stomatology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 253 Gongyedadao Road, Guangzhou, 510282, China.
  • Shen XQ; Department of Stomatology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 253 Gongyedadao Road, Guangzhou, 510282, China. 1061787412@qq.com.
  • Geng YM; Department of Stomatology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 253 Gongyedadao Road, Guangzhou, 510282, China. gym@smu.edu.cn.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 1095, 2024 Sep 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39285427
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This clinical study aimed to evaluate the practical value of integrating an AI diagnostic model into clinical practice for caries detection using intraoral images.

METHODS:

In this prospective study, 4,361 teeth from 191 consecutive patients visiting an endodontics clinic were examined using an intraoral camera. The AI model, combining MobileNet-v3 and U-net architectures, was used for caries detection. The diagnostic performance of the AI model was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy, with the clinical diagnosis by endodontic specialists as the reference standard.

RESULTS:

The overall accuracy of the AI-assisted caries detection was 93.40%. The sensitivity and specificity were 81.31% (95% CI 78.22%-84.06%) and 95.65% (95% CI 94.94%-96.26%), respectively. The NPV and PPV were 96.49% (95% CI 95.84%-97.04%) and 77.68% (95% CI 74.49%-80.58%), respectively. The diagnostic accuracy varied depending on tooth position and caries type, with the highest accuracy in anterior teeth (96.04%) and the lowest sensitivity for interproximal caries in anterior teeth and buccal caries in premolars (approximately 10%).

CONCLUSION:

The AI-assisted caries detection tool demonstrated potential for clinical application, with high overall accuracy and specificity. However, the sensitivity varied considerably depending on tooth position and caries type, suggesting the need for further improvement. Integration of multimodal data and development of more advanced AI models may enhance the performance of AI-assisted caries detection in clinical practice.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inteligência Artificial / Sensibilidade e Especificidade / Cárie Dentária Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inteligência Artificial / Sensibilidade e Especificidade / Cárie Dentária Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article