Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Human performance in predicting enhancement quality of gliomas using gadolinium-free MRI sequences.
Azizova, Aynur; Wamelink, Ivar J H G; Prysiazhniuk, Yeva; Cakmak, Marcus; Kaya, Elif; Petr, Jan; Barkhof, Frederik; Keil, Vera C.
Afiliação
  • Azizova A; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Wamelink IJHG; Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Prysiazhniuk Y; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Cakmak M; Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Kaya E; Second Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathophysiology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Petr J; Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Barkhof F; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Keil VC; University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Neuroimaging ; 2024 Sep 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39300683
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

PURPOSE:

To develop and test a decision tree for predicting contrast enhancement quality and shape using precontrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences in a large adult-type diffuse glioma cohort.

METHODS:

Preoperative MRI scans (development/optimization/test sets n = 31/38/303, male = 17/22/189, mean age = 52/59/56.7 years, high-grade glioma = 22/33/249) were retrospectively evaluated, including pre- and postcontrast T1-weighted, T2-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, and diffusion-weighted imaging sequences. Enhancement prediction decision tree (EPDT) was developed using development and optimization sets, incorporating four imaging features necrosis, diffusion restriction, T2 inhomogeneity, and nonenhancing tumor margins. EPDT accuracy was assessed on a test set by three raters of variable experience. True enhancement features (gold standard) were evaluated using pre- and postcontrast T1-weighted images. Statistical analysis used confusion matrices, Cohen's/Fleiss' kappa, and Kendall's W. Significance threshold was p < .05.

RESULTS:

Raters 1, 2, and 3 achieved overall accuracies of .86 (95% confidence interval [CI] .81-.90), .89 (95% CI .85-.92), and .92 (95% CI .89-.95), respectively, in predicting enhancement quality (marked, mild, or no enhancement). Regarding shape, defined as the thickness of enhancing margin (solid, rim, or no enhancement), accuracies were .84 (95% CI .79-.88), .88 (95% CI .84-.92), and .89 (95% CI .85-.92). Intrarater intergroup agreement comparing predicted and true enhancement features consistently reached substantial levels (≥.68 [95% CI .61-.75]). Interrater comparison showed at least moderate agreement (group ≥.42 [95% CI .36-.48], pairwise ≥.61 [95% CI .50-.72]). Among the imaging features in the EPDT, necrosis assessment displayed the highest intra- and interrater consistency (≥.80 [95% CI .73-.88]).

CONCLUSION:

The proposed EPDT has high accuracy in predicting enhancement patterns of gliomas irrespective of rater experience.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article