Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Control of the immune response by DHEA and its metabolites.
Loria, R M; Padgett, D A.
Afiliação
  • Loria RM; Department of Microbiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond 23298-09678, USA.
Rinsho Byori ; 46(6): 505-17, 1998 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9691759
ABSTRACT
The 17 keto steroid, Dehydroepiandrosterone (5-androsten-3 beta-17-one, DHEA) has been shown to protect mice from a variety of lethal infections. This includes, but is not limited to, infection with viruses (herpesvirus type 2, coxsackievirus B4-CVB4),bacteria (Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa), and a parasite (Cryptosporidium parvum). We have reported that androstenediol (5-androsten-3 beta-17 beta-diol, beta AED), which is derived from DHEA, is at least 100x more effective in up-regulating systemic resistance against CVB4-infection than its precursor. Furthermore, androstenetriol (5-androstene-3 beta-7 beta-17 beta-triol beta AET) which is formed by 7 beta hydroxylation of beta AED, was more effective against CVB4-infection than its precursor beta AED. Neither steroid however has shown any significant direct antiviral effects. The in-vitro influences of DHEA, beta AED, and beta AET on a mitogen-induced mixed splenocyte proliferation assay were determined. The results showed that DHEA suppressed the proliferation of concanavalin A (Con A) or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) activated cultures in a dose dependent manner. beta AED had little influence on the activation response. However, beta AET potentiated the response to both mitogens significantly above control. The regulation of interleukin-2 and interleukin-3 secretion from Con A-activated lymphocytes was analogous to these observations. These functions were suppressed by DHEA, unaffected by beta AED, and potently increased by beta AET. Moreover, the classic immuno-suppressive effects of hydro-cortisone on Con A-induced lymphocyte proliferation, as well as IL-2 and IL-3 production were unaffected by co-cultured with DHEA and only minimally counteracted by beta AED. In contrast, beta AET significantly counteracted the effect of hydrocortisone when co-cultured together. These results show that while in-vivo, DHEA, beta AED, and beta AET each function in a similar manner. In-vitro, their effects are dramatically different from one another with only beta AET potentiating the cellular response by increasing lymphocyte activation and counteracting the immuno-suppressive activity of hydrocortisone.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Bacterianas / Viroses / Desidroepiandrosterona Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 1998 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Bacterianas / Viroses / Desidroepiandrosterona Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 1998 Tipo de documento: Article