[The treatment of asthma: indications for a change in approach]. / Behandeling van astma: aanwijzingen voor een verandering in aanpak.

In both children and adults with persistent asthma, treatment with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) is recommended. Moreover, inhaled bronchodilating agents have a clear role to play. The minimum effective dose of an ICS in the individual patient can be determined either by starting with a low dosage of ICS and increasing the dosage gradually on the basis of the symptoms (the 'step-up' approach), or by starting with a high dosage and, if the results are good, decreasing it to the pointwhere adequate control is maintained (the 'step-down' approach). In a study of the step-up approach with the ICS fluticasone, with or without salmeterol as a long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) in adult patients with asthma, the approach with salmeterol produced the best results, namely, good asthma control in 71% of the patients and total control in 41%. In a study involving both children and adults with asthma, good results were obtained from treatment with a relatively low maintenance dose of ICS (budesonide) combined with a LABA (formoterol), whereby patients were permitted to use additional inhalations of the combination ICS and LABA. How the different therapeutic concepts result in long-term control, what the side effects are in the long term, and whether, in addition to the clinical symptoms, laboratory findings are also important as a therapeutic criterion are all unknown.

Allergen-induced recruitment of inflammatory cells in lavage 3 and 24 h after challenge in allergic asthmatic lungs.

To determine whether a link exists between the recruitment of inflammatory cells in the airways on a bronchial and bronchoalveolar level and the development of allergen-induced increase in bronchial hyperresponsiveness after allergen challenge, we used bronchial lavage and bronchoalveolar lavage to assess the airway responses to allergen. Twelve symptomatic atopic asthmatics were studied. In all patients bronchial and bronchoalveolar lavage was performed before, 3 h, and 24 h after allergen challenge. Monoclonal antibodies were used directed against T cells (CD3, CD4, CD8) and the eosinophil cationic protein (EG2). Eight patients showed a dual asthmatic response; four patients showed only an early asthmatic reaction after allergen challenge. Clear differences were found between bronchial and bronchoalveolar lavage. Activated eosinophils (EG2) were significantly increased both at 3 h (p = 0.01) and 24 h (p = 0.005). The number of activated eosinophils was significantly higher in the dual responders. A correlation was observed between the severity of the late asthmatic reaction (LAR) and the number of epithelial cells in the bronchial recovery at 3 h, but not at 24 h, in patients who clinically developed a LAR. No significant changes in the number of CD3, CD4, and CD8 cells 3 and 24 h after the challenge both in the bronchial and bronchoalveolar recovery were observed. We conclude that the number of activated eosinophils in bronchial lavage is associated with the development of the LAR and allergen-induced increase in bronchial hyperresponsiveness.

Adjustable maintenance dosing with budesonide/formoterol compared with fixed-dose salmeterol/fluticasone in moderate to severe asthma.

BACKGROUND: Current asthma guidelines recommend that patients are educated to adjust their medication according to their asthma severity using physician-guided self-management plans. However, many patients take a fixed dose of their controller medication and adjust their reliever medication according to asthma symptoms. OBJECTIVES: This study examined whether asthma control improved if patients adjusted the maintenance dose of budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort Turbuhaler* 160/4.5 microg) according to asthma severity compared with traditional fixed dosing (FD) regimens. METHODS: Symptomatic patients with asthma (n = 658, mean symptom score 1.5, mean inhaled corticosteroids 735 microg/day, mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV(1)] 84% predicted) were randomised after 2 weeks' run-in to either: budesonide/formoterol adjustable maintenance dosing (AMD), budesonide/formoterol FD or salmeterol/fluticasone (Seretide Diskus dagger 50/250 microg) FD. In a 4-week double-blind period, both budesonide/formoterol AMD and FD groups received two inhalations twice daily (bid) and salmeterol/fluticasone FD patients received one inhalation bid. In the following 6-month open extension, both FD groups continued with the same treatment. Patients in the AMD group with well-controlled asthma stepped down to one inhalation bid; others continued with two inhalations bid. All AMD patients could increase to four inhalations bid for 7-14 days if symptoms worsened. All patients used terbutaline or salbutamol for symptom relief throughout. The primary variable was the odds of achieving a well-controlled asthma week (WCAW). RESULTS: The odds ratio for achieving a WCAW did not differ between the FD regimens; however, during the open period, budesonide/formoterol AMD increased the odds of achieving a WCAW vs. budesonide/formoterol FD (odds ratio 1.335; 95% CI: 1.001, 1.783; p = 0.049) despite a 15% reduction in average study drug use. Budesonide/formoterol AMD patients had a lower exacerbation rate over the study: 40% lower vs. salmeterol/fluticasone FD (p = 0.018); 32% lower vs. budesonide/formoterol FD (NS). During the double-blind period, there were no clinically relevant differences between the budesonide/formoterol FD and salmeterol/fluticasone FD groups. Budesonide/formoterol AMD patients used less reliever medication in the open extension: 0.58 vs. 0.92 occasions/day for budesonide/formoterol FD (p = 0.001) and 0.80 occasions/day for salmeterol/fluticasone FD (p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Adjustable maintenance dosing with budesonide/formoterol provides more effective asthma control by reducing exacerbations and reliever medication usage compared with fixed-dose salmeterol/fluticasone.

Efficacy and safety of budesonide/formoterol single inhaler therapy versus a higher dose of budesonide in moderate to severe asthma.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a novel asthma management strategy--budesonide/formoterol for both maintenance and symptom relief (Symbicort Single Inhaler Therapy)--compared with a higher maintenance dose of budesonide in patients with moderate to severe asthma. METHODS: This was a 12-month, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study. Symptomatic patients with asthma (n = 1890; mean age 43 years [range 11 years-80 years], mean baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV(1)] 70% of predicted, mean inhaled corticosteroid [ICS] dose 746 microg/day) received either budesonide (160 microg, 2 inhalations twice daily) plus terbutaline 0.4 mg as needed or a daily maintenance dose of budesonide/formoterol (160/4.5 microg, 2 inhalations once daily) with additional inhalations of budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 microg as needed. Time to first severe exacerbation (hospitalisation/emergency room [ER] treatment or systemic steroids due to asthma worsening or a fall in morning peak expiratory flow [PEF] to < or = 70% of baseline on 2 consecutive days) was the primary outcome variable. RESULTS: A total of 1890 patients were randomised, of whom 1563 (83%) had severe asthma. The time to first severe exacerbation was prolonged by budesonide/formoterol single inhaler therapy (p < 0.001) compared with a higher dose of budesonide. The risk of having a severe exacerbation was 39% lower with budesonide/formoterol single inhaler therapy compared with budesonide (p < 0.001). The number needed to treat to prevent one severe exacerbation per year with budesonide/formoterol compared with budesonide was 5. The budesonide/formoterol group had 45% fewer severe exacerbations requiring medical intervention per patient compared with the budesonide group (p < 0.001). Budesonide/formoterol patients had fewer hospitalisations/ER treatments (15 vs 25 events, respectively [descriptive statistics]) and fewer treatment days with systemic steroids (1776 days vs 3177 days, respectively [descriptive statistics]) compared with budesonide patients. Budesonide/formoterol single inhaler therapy patients used less as-needed medication compared with budesonide patients (0.90 vs 1.42 inhalations/day; p < 0.001). The mean daily ICS dose was lower in the budesonide/formoterol group than in the budesonide group (466 microg/day vs 640 microg/day). Over the 12-month study period, the budesonide/formoterol group achieved asthma control sufficient to not require any additional as-needed medication on 60% of days. Overall, budesonide/formoterol single inhaler therapy gave 31 more asthma control days (a night and day with no asthma symptoms and no as-needed medication use) per patient-year and 12 additional undisturbed nights per patient-year compared with a higher dose of budesonide. Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Budesonide/formoterol single inhaler therapy has the potential to provide a complete asthma management approach with one inhaler, demonstrating a high level of efficacy in patients with moderate to severe asthma.

Differences in the effect of allergen avoidance on bronchial hyperresponsiveness as measured by methacholine, adenosine 5'-monophosphate, and exercise in asthmatic children.

Asthma is now considered as an inflammatory airway disease. There is evidence that allergen avoidance reduces clinical symptoms in atopic asthma. We investigated the effect of a month's stay in the hypoallergenic environment of Davos, Switzerland (1560 m) which is relatively free of house dust mite (HDM) on changes in bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), using the challenge tests of adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP), exercise and methacholine to test for BHR. Thirteen asthmatic children with an allergy to HDM participated in the study. We measured BHR on admission to the Davos Asthma Center and after 1 month in the house dust-free environment. The medications used by the patients at the time of admission were kept unchanged during this month. No significant difference in BHR was found to methacholine challenge after a 1-month stay at high altitude (P > 0.05). By contrast, the response to AMP was significantly different as indicated by displacement of the dose-response curve to the right by 2.15 doubling concentrations (P = 0.005). We also observed a significant difference in response to exercise (P = 0.03). These results indicate that a month's stay in a hypoallergenic environment caused a reduction in BHR to AMP and exercise, but not to methacholine. In addition, the results support the concept of differences in trigger mechanisms for BHR, and that responses to a methacholine challenge are not the same as responses to an exercise challenge. The observed reduction in BHR in asthmatic children to the indirect bronchial stimuli of AMP and exercise suggest reduced airway inflammation following avoidance of house dust aeroallergens. AMP and exercise challenges may therefore be better indicators of asthmatic airway inflammation than the direct stimulus of methacholine.

Compliance with inhaled glucocorticoids and concomitant use of long-acting beta2-agonists.

We investigated whether treatment with a long-acting beta2-agonist (LAbeta2) is associated with a decrease in patient compliance with regard to inhalation corticosteroids (ICS). Date on prescriptions collected by 15,760 patients suffering from airways disease were provided by 69 Dutch pharmacies. All prescriptions of ICS and LAbeta2 were analysed and divided in four groups by LAbeta2 use during 1997 and 1998. Date from 15,760 patients were available. In the 10,929 patients not treated with LAbeta2, compliance decreased slightly but not significantly. In 3281 patients receiving LAbeta2 compliance also decreased slightly but not significantly. In 404 patients, who used a LAbeta2 in 1997 and discontinued treatment in 1998, the compliance fell significantly (P<0.05). In 1147 patients who started to use a LAbeta2 in 1998, compliance with ICS significantly improved (P<0.05). These results suggest that the regular use of LAbeta2 improves compliance with ICS. Therefore, the concern that compliance with inhaled corticosteroid therapy will decrease under concomitant use of LAbeta2 appear to be unfounded.

Clinical evaluation of lymphocyte sub-populations and oxygen radical production in sarcoidosis and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL)-derived parameters of interstitial lung disease and clinical and lung function parameters in 34 patients with sarcoidosis and 23 patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). BAL findings of healthy individuals served as controls. Cell content and differentiation of BAL fluid were determined. Oxygen radical (O2-) production of BAL cells and of blood polymorphonuclear (PMN) cells was measured. Phenotypes of lung and blood lymphocytes were determined by immunoperoxidase staining. In addition, lung function was assessed, chest X-rays were made and serum ACE was measured. Lymphocyte alveolitis in sarcoidosis was associated with increased alveolar macrophage (AM) O2- production (P < 0.025 vs. sarcoidosis with normal lymphocyte counts). Patients with extrapulmonary sarcoidosis had higher CD4/CD8 ratios in BAL (P < 0.025) and shorter disease duration (P < 0.01) than those with strictly pulmonary sarcoidosis. Disease duration in sarcoidosis correlated inversely with the number of BAL cells (r = -0.38, P < 0.05), the relative and absolute number of lymphocytes in BAL fluid (r = -0.34, P < 0.05 and r = -0.44, P < 0.01, respectively) and the percentage of CD4-positive cells and the CD4/CD8 ratio (r = -0.43, P < 0.05 and r = -0.48, P < 0.025, respectively). Although significant increases in O2- production by BAL cells were observed in both IPF and sarcoidosis, only in sarcoidosis was a higher AM O2- production associated with a significantly lower total lung capacity (r = -0.67, P < 0.005) and pulmonary diffusing capacity TLCO (r = -0.50, P < 0.05). In conclusion, our findings show that lung lymphocyte phenotypes differ among patients with pulmonary and extrapulmonary sarcoidosis and that O2- production is upregulated in active sarcoidosis. In addition, our findings suggest that different relationships between BAL data and lung function in patients with sarcoidosis and IPF may be explained by differences in disease duration. In IPF, disease duration is likely to be underestimated because of its insidious onset. In sarcoidosis, the presence of extrapulmonary symptoms, helpful to establish an early diagnosis, is associated with significant BAL lymphocytosis.

A 49-year-old woman with well-differentiated fetal adenocarcinoma.

A 49-year-old woman underwent a pneumonectomy because of a mass in the middle lobe. Histological examination of the tumour showed a well-differentiated fetal adenocarcinoma (WDFA). This rare tumour appears to be associated with an excellent prognosis in the absence of metastases following surgical resection.

Combined expression of the non-receptor protein tyrosine kinases FAK and Src in primary colorectal cancer is associated with tumor recurrence and metastasis formation.

PURPOSE: The protein tyrosine kinase focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and Src in association with phosphorylation of the adapter protein paxillin are essential in tumor metastasis formation. Elevated levels of FAK, Src and paxillin may increase the metastatic potential of colorectal tumor cells. The aim of the current study was to examine the expression of FAK, Src, and paxillin using immunohistochemistry in the context of disease progression and to evaluate its clinical significance as a prognostic factor. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The relationship between FAK, Src and paxillin levels and colorectal cancer progression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 104 colorectal cancer specimens with clinical follow up. In addition, FAK, Src and paxillin expression levels were quantified in 68 colorectal tumors and corresponding liver metastases. RESULTS: FAK and paxillin expression individually did not significantly impact time to recurrence (p=0.09, and p=0.89 respectively). Src expression was associated with tumor recurrence p=0.03. However, tumors that expressed both high FAK and Src levels had a significant shorter time to recurrence (p=0.004, hazard ratio: 2.98, 95% CI 1.14-6.31). FAK, Src and paxillin showed equivalent levels in corresponding liver metastases compared to the primary tumors (p=0.67, p=0.28 and p=0.34 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that high levels of FAK and Src combined were predictive for recurrence of colorectal cancer. In addition, expression of FAK, Src and paxillin in colorectal cancer were maintained in corresponding distant metastases.

Improved lung function and symptom control with formoterol on demand in asthma.

Many asthma patients remain symptomatic despite maintenance therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and salbutamol as rescue medication. In the present study the relative efficacy and preference for as-needed formoterol compared with salbutamol was examined. In total, 211 patients with a mean age of 45 yrs (mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 77% predicted normal), using ICS, were randomised to 3 weeks' double-blind treatment with as-needed formoterol 4.5 microg Turbuhaler and with as-needed salbutamol 100 mug Turbuhaler in a cross-over fashion. Overall, lung function and symptom control were better with as-needed formoterol than with as-needed salbutamol. During as-needed formoterol treatment daytime and night-time symptom scores were lower, peak expiratory flow and FEV1 were higher and patients experienced fewer disturbed nights (34%) compared with as-needed salbutamol. Patients preferred the formoterol treatment to salbutamol. Of the 162 patients expressing a preference, formoterol was preferred by 68% (95% confidence interval: 60-75). Subjective assessment of effectiveness also favoured formoterol, which was perceived as slightly faster acting than salbutamol. In conclusion, as-needed formoterol improved symptoms and lung function compared with salbutamol and was perceived as more effective and at least as fast acting for symptom relief.

Comparison of formoterol, salbutamol and salmeterol in methacholine-induced severe bronchoconstriction.

The onset of the bronchodilating effect of formoterol (12 microg by Turbuhaler) was compared with that of salbutamol (50 microg by Turbuhaler), salmeterol (50 microg by Diskhaler) and placebo in methacholine-induced severe bronchoconstriction. Seventeen subjects with mild-to-moderate asthma completed this randomized, double blind, cross-over, double-dummy study. On four study days, baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was recorded and the subjects were challenged with methacholine until FEV1 fell by at least 30%. Immediately thereafter, the study drugs were inhaled and lung function was assessed for 60 min. The geometric mean time for FEV1 to return to 85% of baseline was 7.2 min with formoterol, 6.5 min with salbutamol, 14.1 min with salmeterol and 34.7 min with placebo (p=0.0001, overall ANOVA). The difference between formoterol and salmeterol was statistically significant (p=0.01); there was no difference between formoterol and salbutamol (p=0.69). In conclusion, formoterol reversed methacholine-induced severe bronchoconstriction as rapidly as salbutamol and more rapidly than salmeterol. Classifying beta2-agonists as "fast"- and "slow"- acting may be supplemental to "short"- and "long"-acting.