Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 54
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Am J Transplant ; 17(3): 712-723, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27597148

ABSTRACT

An unbalanced microbiome may lead to disease by creating aberrant immune responses. A recent association of cellular rejection with the development of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) suggests the role of immune-mediated tissue injury. We hypothesized that developing IFTA correlates with altered urinary tract microbiomes (UMBs). UMBs at two serial time points, 1 and 6-8 months posttransplant, were assessed by 16S microbial ribosomal gene sequencing in 25 patients developing biopsy-proven IFTA compared to 23 transplant patients with normal biopsies and excellent function (TX) and 20 healthy nontransplant controls (HC). Streptococcus, the dominant genera in HC males, was lower in IFTA and TX males at 1 month compared to HCs. At 6-8 months, Streptococcus was further decreased in IFTA males, but normalized in TX. IFTA males and females had increases in number of genera per sample at 6-8 months. UMB composition varied substantially between individuals in all groups. Despite the wide variation in UMBs between individuals, IFTA was associated with a loss in dominant resident urinary microbes in males, and a parallel increase in nonresident, pathogenic bacteria in males and females. UMB changes may contribute to IFTA development by alteration of the host immune response.


Subject(s)
Atrophy/urine , Biomarkers/urine , Fibrosis/urine , Graft Rejection/urine , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Kidney Tubules/pathology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/urine , Microbiota/genetics , Atrophy/etiology , Biopsy , Case-Control Studies , Female , Fibrosis/etiology , Follow-Up Studies , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Graft Rejection/etiology , Graft Rejection/pathology , Graft Survival , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Function Tests , Kidney Tubules/metabolism , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Risk Factors
2.
Am J Transplant ; 17(9): 2410-2419, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28226199

ABSTRACT

Although the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease sodium (MELD Na) score is now used for liver transplant allocation in the United States, mortality prediction may be underestimated by the score. Using aggregated electronic health record data from 7834 adult patients with cirrhosis, we determined whether the cause of cirrhosis or cirrhosis complications was associated with an increased risk of death among patients with a MELD Na score ≤15 and whether patients with the greatest risk of death could benefit from liver transplantation (LT). Over median follow-up of 2.3 years, 3715 patients had a maximum MELD Na score ≤15. Overall, 3.4% were waitlisted for LT. Severe hypoalbuminemia, hepatorenal syndrome, and hepatic hydrothorax conferred the greatest risk of death independent of MELD Na score with 1-year predicted mortality >14%. Approximately 10% possessed these risk factors. Of these high-risk patients, only 4% were waitlisted for LT, despite no difference in nonliver comorbidities between waitlisted patients and those not listed. In addition, risk factors for death among waitlisted patients were the same as those for patients not waitlisted, although the effect of malnutrition was significantly greater for waitlisted patients (hazard ratio 8.65 [95% CI 2.57-29.11] vs. 1.47 [95% CI 1.08-1.98]). Using the MELD Na score for allocation may continue to limit access to LT.


Subject(s)
Electronic Health Records , End Stage Liver Disease/mortality , Liver Cirrhosis/mortality , Liver Transplantation/mortality , Models, Statistical , Resource Allocation , Waiting Lists/mortality , End Stage Liver Disease/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Sodium/blood , Tissue and Organ Procurement/methods , United States
3.
Am J Transplant ; 17(8): 2103-2116, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28188669

ABSTRACT

We performed orthogonal technology comparisons of concurrent peripheral blood and biopsy tissue samples from 69 kidney transplant recipients who underwent comprehensive algorithm-driven clinical phenotyping. The sample cohort included patients with normal protocol biopsies and stable transplant (sTx) function (n = 25), subclinical acute rejection (subAR, n = 23), and clinical acute rejection (cAR, n = 21). Comparisons between microarray and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) signatures were performed and demonstrated a strong correlation between the blood and tissue compartments for both technology platforms. A number of shared differentially expressed genes and pathways between subAR and cAR in both platforms strongly suggest that these two clinical phenotypes form a continuum of alloimmune activation. SubAR is associated with fewer or less expressed genes than cAR in blood, whereas in biopsy tissues, this clinical phenotype demonstrates a more robust molecular signature for both platforms. The discovery work done in this study confirms a clear ability to detect gene expression profiles for sTx, subAR, and cAR in both blood and biopsy tissue, yielding equivalent predictive performance that is agnostic to both technology and platform. Our data also provide strong biological insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying these signatures, underscoring their logistical potential as molecular diagnostics to improve clinical outcomes following kidney transplantation.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/metabolism , Gene Expression Profiling , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Kidney Failure, Chronic/genetics , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Rejection/blood , Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Graft Rejection/genetics , Graft Survival , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
4.
Am J Transplant ; 16(1): 221-34, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26227106

ABSTRACT

We previously described early results of a nonchimeric operational tolerance protocol in human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical living donor renal transplants and now update these results. Recipients given alemtuzumab, tacrolimus/MPA with early sirolimus conversion were multiply infused with donor hematopoietic CD34(+) stem cells. Immunosuppression was withdrawn by 24 months. Twelve months later, operational tolerance was confirmed by rejection-free transplant biopsies. Five of the first eight enrollees were initially tolerant 1 year off immunosuppression. Biopsies of three others after total withdrawal showed Banff 1A acute cellular rejection without renal dysfunction. With longer follow-up including 5-year posttransplant biopsies, four of the five tolerant recipients remain without rejection while one developed Banff 1A without renal dysfunction. We now add seven new subjects (two operationally tolerant), and demonstrate time-dependent increases of circulating CD4(+) CD25(+++) CD127(-) FOXP3(+) Tregs versus losses of Tregs in nontolerant subjects (p < 0.001). Gene expression signatures, developed using global RNA expression profiling of sequential whole blood and protocol biopsy samples, were highly associative with operational tolerance as early as 1 year posttransplant. The blood signature was validated by an external Immune Tolerance Network data set. Our approach to nonchimeric operational HLA-identical tolerance reveals association with Treg immunophenotypes and serial gene expression profiles.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/analysis , HLA Antigens/genetics , HLA Antigens/immunology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/immunology , Kidney Transplantation , Transplantation Chimera/immunology , Transplantation Tolerance/immunology , Adult , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gene Expression Profiling , Genomics/methods , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Graft Survival , Histocompatibility , Humans , Immunophenotyping , Kidney Failure, Chronic/genetics , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Function Tests , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Transplantation Chimera/genetics
5.
Am J Transplant ; 16(7): 1982-98, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26990570

ABSTRACT

Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) is found in approximately 25% of 1-year biopsies posttransplant. It is known that IFTA correlates with decreased graft survival when histological evidence of inflammation is present. Identifying the mechanistic etiology of IFTA is important to understanding why long-term graft survival has not changed as expected despite improved immunosuppression and dramatically reduced rates of clinical acute rejection (AR) (Services UDoHaH. http://www.ustransplant.org/annual_reports/current/509a_ki.htm). Gene expression profiles of 234 graft biopsy samples were obtained with matching clinical and outcome data. Eighty-one IFTA biopsies were divided into subphenotypes by degree of histological inflammation: IFTA with AR, IFTA with inflammation, and IFTA without inflammation. Samples with AR (n = 54) and normally functioning transplants (TX; n = 99) were used in comparisons. A novel analysis using gene coexpression networks revealed that all IFTA phenotypes were strongly enriched for dysregulated gene pathways and these were shared with the biopsy profiles of AR, including IFTA samples without histological evidence of inflammation. Thus, by molecular profiling we demonstrate that most IFTA samples have ongoing immune-mediated injury or chronic rejection that is more sensitively detected by gene expression profiling. These molecular biopsy profiles correlated with future graft loss in IFTA samples without inflammation.


Subject(s)
Atrophy/mortality , Fibrosis/mortality , Gene Expression Profiling , Graft Rejection/mortality , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Kidney Tubules/pathology , Nephritis, Interstitial/mortality , Atrophy/genetics , Fibrosis/genetics , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Graft Rejection/genetics , Graft Survival , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/genetics , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Function Tests , Kidney Tubules/metabolism , Nephritis, Interstitial/genetics , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Survival Rate
6.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 28(2): 166-74, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26803539

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Efforts to improve patient safety are challenged by the lack of universally agreed upon terms. The International Classification for Patient Safety (ICPS) was developed by the World Health Organization for this purpose. This study aimed to test the applicability of the ICPS to a surgical population. DESIGN: A web-based safety debriefing was sent to clinicians involved in surgical care of abdominal organ transplant patients. A multidisciplinary team of patient safety experts, surgeons and researchers used the data to develop a system of classification based on the ICPS. Disagreements were reconciled via consensus, and a codebook was developed for future use by researchers. RESULTS: A total of 320 debriefing responses were used for the initial review and codebook development. In total, the 320 debriefing responses contained 227 patient safety incidents (range: 0-7 per debriefing) and 156 contributing factors/hazards (0-5 per response). The most common severity classification was 'reportable circumstance,' followed by 'near miss.' The most common incident types were 'resources/organizational management,' followed by 'medical device/equipment.' Several aspects of surgical care were encompassed by more than one classification, including operating room scheduling, delays in care, trainee-related incidents, interruptions and handoffs. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that a framework for patient safety can be applied to facilitate the organization and analysis of surgical safety data. Several unique aspects of surgical care require consideration, and by using a standardized framework for describing concepts, research findings can be compared and disseminated across surgical specialties. The codebook is intended for use as a framework for other specialties and institutions.


Subject(s)
Medical Errors/classification , Patient Safety , Surgical Procedures, Operative/standards , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Kidney Transplantation/standards , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Liver Transplantation/standards , Medical Errors/prevention & control , Models, Theoretical , Patient Safety/standards , Surgical Procedures, Operative/adverse effects , World Health Organization
7.
Am J Transplant ; 15(9): 2465-9, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26137963

ABSTRACT

The new national Kidney Allocation System of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN), effective as of December 4, 2014, was designed to improve the chances of transplanting the most highly sensitized patients on the waitlist, those with calculated panel reactive antibody values of 98%, 99% and 100%. Recently, it was suggested that these highly sensitized patients will experience inequitable access, given the reported high prevalence of antibodies to HLA-DP, and the fact that only about 1/3 of deceased donors are typed for HLA-DP antigens. Here we report that 320/2948 flow cytometric crossmatches performed for the Northwestern transplant program over the past 28 months were positive solely due to HLA-DP donor-specific antibodies (11%; 16.5% of patients with HLA antibodies-sensitized patients). We further show that 58/207 (12%) HLA-DR serologically matched donor-recipient pairs had a positive B cell flow crossmatch due to donor-specific HLA class II antibodies, and 2/34 (6%) serologic zero-HLA-A-B-DR mismatch had a positive flow crossmatch due to HLA-DSA. We therefore provide information regarding the necessity and importance of complete donor HLA typing including both chains of the HLA-DP antigen (encoded by HLA-DPA1 and HLA-DPB1) at the time of organ offer.


Subject(s)
HLA-DP alpha-Chains/immunology , HLA-DP beta-Chains/immunology , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Organ Transplantation , Resource Allocation/legislation & jurisprudence , Resource Allocation/standards , Tissue and Organ Procurement/organization & administration , Flow Cytometry , Histocompatibility/immunology , Histocompatibility Testing , Humans , Isoantibodies/immunology , Tissue Donors , United States
8.
Am J Transplant ; 15(1): 64-75, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25403742

ABSTRACT

The ability to generate patient-specific cells through induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology has encouraged development of three-dimensional extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffolds as bioactive substrates for cell differentiation with the long-range goal of bioengineering organs for transplantation. Perfusion decellularization uses the vasculature to remove resident cells, leaving an intact ECM template wherein new cells grow; however, a rigorous evaluative framework assessing ECM structural and biochemical quality is lacking. To address this, we developed histologic scoring systems to quantify fundamental characteristics of decellularized rodent kidneys: ECM structure (tubules, vessels, glomeruli) and cell removal. We also assessed growth factor retention--indicating matrix biofunctionality. These scoring systems evaluated three strategies developed to decellularize kidneys (1% Triton X-100, 1% Triton X-100/0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and 0.02% Trypsin-0.05% EGTA/1% Triton X-100). Triton and Triton/SDS preserved renal microarchitecture and retained matrix-bound basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor. Trypsin caused structural deterioration and growth factor loss. Triton/SDS-decellularized scaffolds maintained 3 h of leak-free blood flow in a rodent transplantation model and supported repopulation with human iPSC-derived endothelial cells and tubular epithelial cells ex vivo. Taken together, we identify an optimal Triton/SDS-based decellularization strategy that produces a biomatrix that may ultimately serve as a rodent model for kidney bioengineering.


Subject(s)
Endothelium, Vascular/cytology , Extracellular Matrix/physiology , Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells/cytology , Kidney Tubules/physiology , Organ Transplantation/standards , Tissue Engineering , Tissue Scaffolds , Animals , Cell Differentiation , Cells, Cultured , Detergents/pharmacology , Humans , Kidney Tubules/blood supply , Kidney Tubules/drug effects , Male , Perfusion , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley
9.
Am J Transplant ; 14(5): 1164-72, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24725967

ABSTRACT

There are no minimally invasive diagnostic metrics for acute kidney transplant rejection (AR), especially in the setting of the common confounding diagnosis, acute dysfunction with no rejection (ADNR). Thus, though kidney transplant biopsies remain the gold standard, they are invasive, have substantial risks, sampling error issues and significant costs and are not suitable for serial monitoring. Global gene expression profiles of 148 peripheral blood samples from transplant patients with excellent function and normal histology (TX; n = 46), AR (n = 63) and ADNR (n = 39), from two independent cohorts were analyzed with DNA microarrays. We applied a new normalization tool, frozen robust multi-array analysis, particularly suitable for clinical diagnostics, multiple prediction tools to discover, refine and validate robust molecular classifiers and we tested a novel one-by-one analysis strategy to model the real clinical application of this test. Multiple three-way classifier tools identified 200 highest value probesets with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and area under the curve for the validation cohort ranging from 82% to 100%, 76% to 95%, 76% to 95%, 79% to 100%, 84% to 100% and 0.817 to 0.968, respectively. We conclude that peripheral blood gene expression profiling can be used as a minimally invasive tool to accurately reveal TX, AR and ADNR in the setting of acute kidney transplant dysfunction.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/blood , Gene Expression Profiling , Graft Rejection/blood , Graft Rejection/classification , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Transplantation , Postoperative Complications/genetics , Adult , Area Under Curve , False Negative Reactions , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Rejection/etiology , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Male , Middle Aged , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Postoperative Complications/blood , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
11.
Am J Transplant ; 13(5): 1149-58, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23489435

ABSTRACT

Health researchers and policy-makers increasingly urge both patient and clinician engagement in shared decision making (SDM) to promote patient-centered care. Although SDM has been examined in numerous clinical settings, it has received little attention in solid organ transplantation. This paper describes the application of SDM to the kidney transplantation context. Several distinctive features of kidney transplantation present challenges to SDM including fragmented patient-provider relationships, the time-sensitive and unpredictable nature of deceased organ offers, decision-making processes by transplant providers serving as both organ guardians (given the organ scarcity) versus advocates for specific patients seeking transplantation, variable clinical practices and policies among transplant centers, and patients' potentially compromised cognitive status and literacy levels. We describe potential barriers to and opportunities for SDM, and posit that SDM is feasible, warranting encouragement in kidney transplantation. We propose strategies to promote and overcome obstacles to SDM in kidney transplantation. We contend that engagement in SDM can be facilitated by re-organization of clinical care, communication and education of providers and patients.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Decision Making , Kidney Transplantation , Patient Participation/statistics & numerical data , Patient-Centered Care/methods , Decision Support Techniques , Humans , Physician-Patient Relations
12.
Am J Transplant ; 12(5): 1208-17, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22335782

ABSTRACT

A wider application of living donor liver transplantation is limited by donor morbidity concerns. An observational cohort of 760 living donors accepted for surgery and enrolled in the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation cohort study provides a comprehensive assessment of incidence, severity and natural history of living liver donation (LLD) complications. Donor morbidity (assessed by 29 specific complications), predictors, time from donation to complications and time from complication onset to resolution were measured outcomes over a 12-year period. Out of the 760 donor procedures, 20 were aborted and 740 were completed. Forty percent of donors had complications (557 complications among 296 donors), mostly Clavien grades 1 and 2. Most severe counted by complication category; grade 1 (minor, n = 232); grade 2 (possibly life-threatening, n = 269); grade 3 (residual disability, n = 5) and grade 4 (leading to death, n = 3). Hernias (7%) and psychological complications (3%) occurred >1 year postdonation. Complications risk increased with transfusion requirement, intraoperative hypotension and predonation serum bilirubin, but did not decline with the increased center experience with LLD. The probability of complication resolution within 1 year was overall 95%, but only 75% for hernias and 42% for psychological complications. This report comprehensively quantifies LLD complication risk and should inform decision making by potential donors and their caregivers.


Subject(s)
Hepatectomy/adverse effects , Liver Transplantation , Living Donors , Postoperative Complications , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Morbidity , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
13.
Am J Transplant ; 12(11): 2949-57, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22759344

ABSTRACT

With the increase in patients having impaired renal function at liver transplant due to MELD, accurate predictors of posttransplant native renal recovery are needed to select candidates for simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLK). Current UNOS guidelines rely on specific clinical criteria for SLK allocation. To examine these guidelines and other variables predicting nonrecovery, we analyzed 155 SLK recipients, focusing on a subset (n = 78) that had post-SLK native GFR (nGFR) determined by radionuclide renal scans. The 77 patients not having renal scans received a higher number of extended criteria donor organs and had worse posttransplant survival. Of the 78 renal scan patients, 31 met and 47 did not meet pre-SLK UNOS criteria. The UNOS criteria were more predictive than our institutional criteria for all nGFR recovery thresholds (20-40 mL/min), although at the most conservative cut-off (nGFR ≤ 20) it had low sensitivity (55.3%), specificity (75%), PPV (67.6%) and NPV (63.8%) for predicting post-SLK nonrecovery. On multivariate analysis, the only predictor of native renal nonrecovery (nGFR ≤ 20) was abnormal pre-SLK renal imaging (OR 3.85, CI 1.22-12.5). Our data support the need to refine SLK selection utilizing more definitive biomarkers and predictors of native renal recovery than current clinical criteria.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation/methods , Kidney/diagnostic imaging , Liver Transplantation/methods , Patient Selection , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Graft Rejection , Graft Survival , Humans , Kidney/pathology , Kidney Function Tests , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Living Donors , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Postoperative Care/methods , Preoperative Care/methods , Radionuclide Imaging , Recovery of Function , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Statistics, Nonparametric , Treatment Outcome
14.
Am J Transplant ; 10(10): 2203-7, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20825382

ABSTRACT

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act passed in 2010 will result in dramatic expansion of publically funded health insurance coverage for low-income individuals. It is estimated that of the 32 million newly insured, 16 million will obtain coverage through expansion of the Medicaid Program, and the remaining 16 million will purchase coverage through their employer or newly legislated insurance exchanges. While the Act contains numerous provisions to improve access to private insurance as discussed in Part I of this analysis, public sector coverage will significantly be affected. The cost of health care reform will be borne disproportionately by Medicare, which faces nearly $500 billion in cuts to be identified by a new independent board. Transplant centers should be concerned about the impact of the reform on the financial aspects of transplantation. In addition, this legislation also utilizes the Medicare Program to drive reform of the health care delivery system, by encouraging the development of integrated Accountable Care Organizations, experimentation with new 'models' of healthcare delivery, and expanded support for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Transplant providers, including transplant centers and physicians/surgeons need to lead this movement, drawing on our experience providing comprehensive multidisciplinary care under global budgets with publically reported outcomes.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/economics , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Public Sector/economics , Health Care Reform/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Insurance, Health/economics , Medicare/economics , Organ Transplantation/economics , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economics , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/organization & administration , United States
15.
Am J Transplant ; 10(10): 2197-2202, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20825383

ABSTRACT

The Health Care Reform (HCR) legislation passed by Congress in 2010 will have significant impact on transplant centers, patients and health care professionals. The Act seeks to expand coverage, limit the growth in health care costs and reform the delivery and insurance systems. In Part I of this two part series, we provide an overview and perspective of changes in private health insurance resulting from HCR. Under the plan, all Americans will be required to purchase coverage through their employer or via an improved individual/small group market. This legislation limits abusive practices such as limitations on preexisting conditions, lifetime and annual coverage limitations and dropping of beneficiaries if they become sick. The legislation will also limit high-cost plans and regulate premium increases. Private sector reforms are likely to benefit our patients by increasing the number of patients with access to transplant services, since the use of 'preexisting' conditions will be eliminated. However without a concomitant increase in the organ supply, longer waiting times and greater use of marginal organs are likely to increase the cost of transplant. Furthermore, transplant providers will receive reduced reimbursement as a result of market consolidation and the growing power of large transplant networks.


Subject(s)
Health Care Reform/legislation & jurisprudence , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement/economics , Organ Transplantation/economics , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/economics , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Care Costs , Humans , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement/trends , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , National Health Insurance, United States/economics , National Health Insurance, United States/legislation & jurisprudence , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economics , Private Sector/economics , United States
16.
Am J Transplant ; 10(12): 2701-7, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21158005

ABSTRACT

Although transplant centers are required to educate patients about kidney transplantation (KT) and living donation (LD), little is known about the educational format, and cultural and linguistic competence necessary for patients to make informed treatment decisions. This study surveyed US transplant administrators about education provided concerning KT and LD and culturally and linguistically competent care. Transplant administrators were invited to participate in an anonymous Internet-based survey about education format, education providers, promoting LD, culturally and linguistically competent care and center characteristics. Most (61%) transplant administrators contacted (N = 280/461) completed the survey. Most administrators (91%) reported that their center provides any type of formal education in their pre-KT evaluation. Education was mostly provided by: nurses (97%), social workers (72%) and surgeons (55%), and predominantly as one-on-one (80%) versus group discussions (60%). Education was primarily delivered through written materials (93%). Written educational materials in Spanish (86%) and the provision of interpreters (82%) were emphasized over educational sessions in Spanish (39%), or employing bilingual (51%) and bicultural staff (39%). Half (55%) promoted LD as the best option. Transplant centers need to take greater efforts to consistently provide appropriate education, promote LD, and provide culturally and linguistically competent care to ensure effective communication with all patients.


Subject(s)
Cultural Competency , Kidney Transplantation/education , Living Donors/education , Patient Education as Topic , Cultural Diversity , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Informed Consent , Multilingualism , Tissue and Organ Procurement , United States
17.
Am J Transplant ; 10(7): 1621-33, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20199501

ABSTRACT

Data submitted by transplant programs to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) are used by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) for policy development, performance evaluation and research. This study compared OPTN/SRTR data with data extracted from medical records by research coordinators from the nine-center A2ALL study. A2ALL data were collected independently of OPTN data submission (48 data elements among 785 liver transplant candidates/recipients; 12 data elements among 386 donors). At least 90% agreement occurred between OPTN/SRTR and A2ALL for 11/29 baseline recipient elements, 4/19 recipient transplant or follow-up elements and 6/12 donor elements. For the remaining recipient and donor elements, >10% of values were missing in OPTN/SRTR but present in A2ALL, confirming that missing data were largely avoidable. Other than variables required for allocation, the percentage missing varied widely by center. These findings support an expanded focus on data quality control by OPTN/SRTR for a broader variable set than those used for allocation. Center-specific monitoring of missing values could substantially improve the data.


Subject(s)
Liver Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Living Donors/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Bilirubin/blood , Body Height , Body Weight , Creatinine/blood , Educational Status , Ethnicity , Female , Humans , International Normalized Ratio , Male , Medical Records , Racial Groups , Registries , Research/statistics & numerical data , United States
19.
Am J Transplant ; 9(6): 1279-86, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19392984

ABSTRACT

The transplant center regulations recently published by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) mandate that observed program-specific survival outcomes to fall within expected risk-adjusted outcomes. Meeting these outcomes is essential to continued participation in the Medicare program. Both donor and recipient variables not considered in current risk adjustment models can result in inferior outcomes and therefore may cause an overestimation of transplant center expected performance, precluding participation in the federally funded Medicare program. We reviewed the most recent four reporting periods published by the Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients on their public website. We identified kidney, liver and heart transplant programs that were flagged for having outcomes statistically lower than expected as well as those that failed to meet CMS criteria. We also analyzed whether center volumes correlated with outcomes in these centers. We highlight the need for mitigating factors that could justify inferior outcomes under specific circumstances. Failure to reach consensus on such a mechanism for appeal may result in risk-averse behavior by transplant centers with respect to innovation and therefore hamper the ability to advance the field of transplantation. We propose a methodology that may address this emerging dilemma.


Subject(s)
Medicare/economics , Organ Transplantation/standards , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Risk Adjustment , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Diffusion of Innovation , Graft Survival , Heart Transplantation/adverse effects , Heart Transplantation/mortality , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Kidney Transplantation/mortality , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Liver Transplantation/mortality , Social Responsibility , Societies, Medical , Treatment Outcome , United States
20.
Am J Transplant ; 9(11): 2466-9, 2009 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19843028

ABSTRACT

The American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) was asked to endorse the 'The Declaration of Istanbul on Organ Trafficking and Transplant Tourism.' The document has been reviewed by the ASTS Ethics Committee and their ensuing report was presented, discussed and approved by the ASTS Council. The ASTS vigorously supports the principles outlined in the Declaration and details specific current obstacles to implementation of some of its proposals in the United States.


Subject(s)
Codes of Ethics , Organ Transplantation/ethics , Tissue Donors/ethics , Tissue and Organ Procurement/ethics , Crime , Humans , Turkey , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL