Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 12(3): 359-63, 1986 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3957734

ABSTRACT

Over the past 2 years, an afterloading technique has been developed and refined to implant radioactive Ir-192 sources into brain tumors. The implantation procedure integrates a stereotaxic system with computerized tomography (CT), which provides tumor position, volume, and guides the placement of catheters. A radiolucent ring-frame immobilizes the head as holes are made at 1 cm intervals with the aid of a template. Catheters containing dummy sources 1 cm apart are then inserted to the desired depth, and their position verified in three dimensions to insure complete coverage of visible tumor volume as defined by contrast enhancement. Once catheters are secured, the anesthetized patient is moved to the intensive care unit where the dummy sources are replaced by ribbons of Ir-192 seeds (specific activity 0.6-1.0 mg Ra eq). CT scans with the dummy sources in place are used to designate spatial coordinates of the active sources. A computer program converts position data and source strength into isodose contours in any plane. The implant duration (70-100 hours) for the desired dose to the tumor periphery (60-120 Gy) is then calculated. Dose rate contours are superimposed on preimplant CT scans. Maximum and minimum doses are determined in each of the various planes. Verification dosimetry has been carried out with thermoluminescent dosimeters placed in a catheter located in a plane along the tumor periphery. In vivo isodose values compared to idealized plans agree within +/-5%-10%.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy/methods , Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Iridium/therapeutic use , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Patient Care Planning/methods , Radioisotopes/therapeutic use , Radiotherapy Dosage
2.
Med Phys ; 6(2): 137-9, 1979.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-111017

ABSTRACT

The effect of secondary blocking on the output for 7-16 MeV electron beams is investigated for the two most widely used methods of field shaping, i.e.,(a) shield on surface, and (b) shield at end of cone with subsequent air gap. For those two methods differences in output on the order of 10% are observed. These effects are explained in terms of the blocking geometry and its influence on scattered radiation.


Subject(s)
Radiotherapy, High-Energy , Radiotherapy, High-Energy/methods , Scattering, Radiation , Technology, Radiologic
3.
Health Phys ; 45(5): 969-73, 1983 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6417056

ABSTRACT

With the increasing number of high-energy linear accelerators being installed in radiation-therapy facilities, an increasing need exists for carefully measured data concerning the shielding parameters of photon radiation in the energy range above 10 MeV. In this study, the 18 MV X-ray beam from a Varian Clinac 20 linear accelerator was employed. Transmission parameters were measured for the primary X-ray beam in concrete and steel. The tenth value layer for steel was 11.3 +/- 0.6 cm and for concrete 45.0 +/- 2.0 cm. Also measured were the transmission parameters for scattered radiation vs angle in concrete and steel.


Subject(s)
Construction Materials/standards , Particle Accelerators , Radiation Protection/standards , Radiotherapy, High-Energy , Scattering, Radiation , Steel
6.
Radiology ; 136(3): 757-62, 1980 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6773106

ABSTRACT

The design and construction details of wedge filters for 25-MV x-ray beams are presented. The authors studied how the characteristics of wedged fields affect their clinical use with 25 MV x rays, paying particular attention to the effects of (a) the wedge angle, (b) the variation of the wedge angle with field size, (c) the variation with depth of the isodose angles relative to th central axis, and (d) the wedge factor. The analysis of the data pertinent to the above parameters is presented for 30 degrees, 45 degrees, and 60 degrees wedges. In addition, the authors experimentally confirmed the accuracy of Tatcher's method (7), by which a wide range of wedge angles smaller than the nominal angle can be generated by using a combination of open and wedge beams.


Subject(s)
Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, High-Energy/instrumentation , Technology, Radiologic
7.
Radiology ; 132(2): 490, 1979 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-111305

ABSTRACT

A system for designing electron-beam treatment fields of any shape and size using the low-melting alloy Lipowitz's metal is described. An individualized shield is produced for each patient. The shields are designed to be mounted on any of the six cone sizes provided with the Varian Clinac 18 linear accelerator but should be adaptable to most accelerators which use cones for electron-beam collimation. Materials are reusable upon completion of treatment.


Subject(s)
Radiation Protection/instrumentation , Radiotherapy, High-Energy , Electrons , Humans
8.
Cancer ; 54(12): 2889-97, 1984 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6498765

ABSTRACT

The optimal sequence for clinical utilization of combined radiotherapy and hyperthermia is not known. The clinical trials have resulted in similar responses whether hyperthermia is given before or after radiation. Moreover, studies addressing the best sequence for an entire course of multifractionated hyperthermia and radiation are lacking. In these experiments, the importance of sequencing of heat and irradiation in a multifractionated treatment regimen in RIF-1 murine tumors was studied. It was observed that a close sequence of heat and irradiation is more beneficial than separate cytotoxic action. When heat and irradiation were given simultaneously, (within 1 hour) 67% to 75% of the tumors were cured. Heat and irradiation given sequentially (the entire course of one following the entire course of the other, each separated by 72 hours) cured 20% of the tumors. No tumors were cured when treated with heat or irradiation alone. The tumor regrowth time (mean tumor doubling time) is much longer in simultaneous treatment than in sequential treatment. It appears that heating first decreases the effectiveness of subsequent irradiation, causing a shorter growth delay than the opposite sequence. Heat alone does not alter the tumor bed permanently, but irradiation seems to do so, resulting in a slower rate of growth upon recurrence.


Subject(s)
Fibrosarcoma/therapy , Hyperthermia, Induced/methods , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/therapy , Animals , Combined Modality Therapy , Fibrosarcoma/radiotherapy , Mice , Mice, Inbred C3H , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy Dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL