Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Inj Prev ; 2024 Oct 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39358038

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Consumer product-related genital injuries in females across all age groups are understudied. Existing research focuses primarily on paediatric populations. We aimed to determine characteristics, trends and predictors of hospitalisation. METHODS: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database was queried for female genital injuries from 2013 to 2022. We stratified our population into four age groups (<18, 18-34, 35-54, >54 years). Automated text matching and manual reviews were employed for variable extraction. χ2 tests and logistic regression were conducted, accounting for survey design and weights. RESULTS: 9054 cases representing a national estimate of 252 329 injuries (95% CI 188 059 to 316 599) were identified. Paediatric injuries were most common (61%) and seniors had the highest hospitalisation rates (28%). Falls were common in paediatric (51%) and senior (48%) groups, whereas self-induced and topical application injuries were more frequent among adults aged 18-34 and 35-54. Injuries predominantly involved playground equipment and bicycles in children, razors and massage devices in adults aged 18-34 and 35-54 and household structures in seniors. Hospitalisation increased over the decade from 7% to 9%; significant predictors of hospitalisation were Asian race (OR=3.39, 95% CI 1.83 to 6.30), fractures (OR=7.98, 95% CI 4.85 to 13.1) and urethral injury (OR=3.15, 95% CI 1.30 to 7.63). CONCLUSIONS: Our study identifies distinct patterns in female genital injuries across ages. In the paediatric cohort, injuries are often linked to playgrounds and bicycles. For adults, grooming products are frequently implicated. Seniors commonly suffer injuries from household structures such as bathtubs. These patterns may inform discussions on tailored preventive strategies.

2.
Urol Pract ; 11(4): 678-683, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38899674

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Patient perceptions of physician reimbursement commonly differ from actual reimbursement. This study aims to improve health care cost transparency and trust between patients, physicians, and the health care system by evaluating patient perceptions of Medicare reimbursement for artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement. METHODS: We identified patients who underwent AUS placement at a single institution from 2014 to 2023. After obtaining informed consent, we administered a telephone survey to ask patients about their perceptions of Medicare reimbursement for AUS surgery and the amount they felt the physician should be compensated. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were enrolled and completed the survey. On average, patients estimated Medicare physician reimbursement to be $18,920, 25 times the actual average procedure reimbursement. Once informed that the actual amount was $757.52, 97% of respondents felt that the reimbursement was "somewhat lower" (13%) or "much lower" (84%) than what they considered fair. The average amount that patients felt the physician should be paid was $8,844, 12 times the actual average procedure reimbursement. Fifty-four percent of patients estimated their physician's reimbursement to be higher than what they later reported as being "fair," representing a presurvey belief that their physician was overpaid. CONCLUSIONS: Patient perceptions of physician reimbursement for AUS are vastly different than the actual amount paid. The discordance between patient perception and actual reimbursement could impact how patients view health care costs and the relationship with their provider.


Subject(s)
Medicare , Urinary Sphincter, Artificial , Humans , Medicare/economics , United States , Male , Female , Aged , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Surveys and Questionnaires , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement , Perception
3.
Fertil Steril ; 120(6): 1098-1111, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37839720

ABSTRACT

The impact of paternal obesity and metabolic disease on semen quality and fertility outcomes is not fully appreciated. With increasing obesity rates, researchers have studied the intricate relationship between paternal body mass index, metabolic health, and male fertility. This systematic review identified 112 articles in the MEDLINE database between 2013 and 2023 that investigated the effects of body mass index, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, exercise, weight loss medication, or bariatric surgery on semen parameters, sperm quality, or fertility outcomes. This review suggests that obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome have a negative impact on various parameters of male fertility, from semen quality to sperm deoxyribonucleic acid integrity. There is also mounting evidence that male obesity is correlated negatively with live births via both natural conception and assisted reproductive technologies. Lifestyle interventions, such as physical exercise, generally appear to improve male fertility markers; however, the type and intensity of exercise may play a crucial role. Pharmacologic treatments for weight loss, such as metformin and glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists, present a more complex picture, with studies suggesting both beneficial and detrimental effects on male reproductive health. Similarly, surgical interventions, such as gastric bypass surgery, show promise in improving hormonal imbalances but have mixed effects on semen parameters. Future research is needed to clarify these associations and inform clinical guidelines. In the interim, health practitioners should incorporate these insights into clinical practices, encouraging proactive lifestyle changes and providing targeted treatments to improve male reproductive health.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Infertility, Male , Metabolic Syndrome , Male , Humans , Semen Analysis , Semen , Metabolic Syndrome/diagnosis , Metabolic Syndrome/epidemiology , Metabolic Syndrome/etiology , Obesity/complications , Obesity/diagnosis , Obesity/epidemiology , Infertility, Male/diagnosis , Infertility, Male/epidemiology , Infertility, Male/etiology , Fertility , Weight Loss
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL