Outcomes after flow cytometry crossmatch-positive lung transplants managed with perioperative desensitization.

Our program previously reported successful outcomes following virtual crossmatch (VXM)-positive lung transplants managed with perioperative desensitization, but our ability to stratify their immunologic risk was limited without flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) data before 2014. The aim of this study was to determine allograft and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)-free survival following VXM-positive/FCXM-positive lung transplants, which are performed at a minority of programs due to the high immunologic risk and lack of data on outcomes. All first-time lung transplant recipients between January 2014 and December 2019 were divided into 3 cohorts: VXM-negative (n = 764), VXM-positive/FCXM-negative (n = 64), and VXM-positive/FCXM-positive (n = 74). Allograft and CLAD-free survival were compared using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Five-year allograft survival was 53% in the VXM-negative cohort, 64% in the VXM-positive/FCXM-negative cohort, and 57% in the VXM-positive/FCXM-positive cohort (P = .7171). Five-year CLAD-free survival was 53% in the VXM-negative cohort, 60% in the VXM-positive/FCXM-negative cohort, and 63% in the VXM-positive/FCXM-positive cohort (P = .8509). This study confirms that allograft and CLAD-free survival of patients who undergo VXM-positive/FCXM-positive lung transplants with the use of our protocol does not differ from those of other lung transplant recipients. Our protocol for VXM-positive lung transplants improves access to transplant for sensitized candidates and mitigates even high immunologic risk.

Evaluating the Impact of Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion on Organ Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) sustains and allows advanced assessment of potentially useable donor lungs before transplantation, potentially relieving resource constraints. OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize the effect of EVLP on organ utilization and patient outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, before-after cohort study using linked institutional data sources of adults wait-listed for lung transplant and donor organs transplanted in Ontario, Canada between 2005 and 2019. We regressed the annual number of transplants against year, EVLP use, and organ characteristics. Time-to-transplant, waitlist mortality, primary graft dysfunction, tracheostomy insertion, in-hospital mortality, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction were evaluated using propensity score-weighted regression. RESULTS: EVLP availability ( P =0.01 for interaction) and EVLP use ( P <0.001 for interaction) were both associated with steeper increases in transplantation than expected by historical trends. EVLP was associated with more donation after circulatory death and extended-criteria donors transplanted, while the numbers of standard-criteria donors remained relatively stable. Significantly faster time-to-transplant was observed after EVLP was available (hazard ratio=1.64 [1.41-1.92]; P <0.001). Fewer patients died on the waitlist after EVLP was available, but no difference in the hazard of waitlist mortality was observed (HR=1.19 [0.81-1.74]; P =0.176). We observed no difference in the likelihood of chronic lung allograft dysfunction before versus after EVLP was available. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a significant increase in organ transplantation since EVLP was introduced into practice, predominantly from increased acceptance of donation after circulatory death and extended-criteria lungs. Our findings suggest that EVLP-associated increases in organ availability meaningfully alleviated some barriers to transplant.

Outcomes of lung transplantation from organ donation after medical assistance in dying: First North American experience.

Over 2.5% of deaths in Canada occur as a result from medical assisting in dying (MAID), and a subset of these deaths result in organ donation. However, detailed outcomes of lung transplant recipients using these donors is lacking. This is a retrospective single center cohort study comparing lung transplantation outcomes after donation using MAID donors compared to neurologically determined death and controlled donation after circulatory death (NDD/cDCD) donors from February 2018 to July 2021. Thirty-three patients received lungs from MAID donors, and 560 patients received lungs from NDD/cDCD donors. The donor diagnoses leading to MAID provision were degenerative neurological diseases (n = 33) and end stage organ failure (n = 5). MAID donors were significantly older than NDD/cDCD donors (56 [IQR 49-64] years vs. 48 [32-59]; p = .0009). Median ventilation period and 30 day mortality were not significantly different between MAID and NDD/cDCD lungs recipients (ventilation: 1 day [1-3] vs 2 days [1-3]; p = .37, deaths 0% [0/33] vs. 2% [11/560], p = .99 respectively). Intermediate-term outcomes were also similar. In summary, for lung transplantation using donors after MAID, recipient outcomes were excellent. Therefore, where this practice is permitted, donation after MAID should be strongly considered for lung transplantation as a way to respect donor wishes while substantially improving outcomes for recipients with end-stage lung disease.

Fungal infection and colonization in lung transplant recipients with chronic lung allograft dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: The incidence and impact of de novo fungal airway colonization and infection in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) with known chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) has not been established. We aimed to determine the 1-year cumulative incidence and risk factors of de novo fungal colonization or infection in LTRs with CLAD and assess the impact of colonization or infection on post-CLAD survival. METHODS: Prospectively collected Toronto Lung Transplant Program database and chart review were used for double-LTRs who were diagnosed with CLAD from January 1, 2016 to January 1, 2020 and who were free of airway fungi within 1 year prior to CLAD onset. International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation definitions were used to define clinical syndromes. Cox-Proportional Hazards Models were used for risk-factor analysis. Survival analysis could not be completed secondary to low number of fungal events; therefore, descriptive statistics were employed for survival outcomes. RESULTS: We found 186 LTRs diagnosed with CLAD meeting our inclusion criteria. The 1-year cumulative incidence for any fungal event was 11.8% (7.0% for infection and 4.8% for colonization). Aspergillus fumigatus was a causative pathogen in eight of 13 (61.5%) patients with infection and six of nine (66.7%) patients with colonization. No patients with fungal colonization post-CLAD developed fungal infection. Peri-CLAD diagnosis (3 months prior or 1 month after) methylprednisolone bolus (hazards ratio: 8.84, p = .001) increased the risk of fungal events. Most patients diagnosed with fungal infections (53.8%) died within 1-year of CLAD onset. CONCLUSION: De novo IFIs and fungal colonization following CLAD onset were not common. Fungal colonization did not lead to fungal infection. Methylprednisolone bolus was a significant risk factors for post-CLAD fungal events.

Long-term outcomes of sensitized lung transplant recipients after peri-operative desensitization.

The Toronto Lung Transplant Program has been using a peri-operative desensitization regimen of plasma exchange, intravenous immune globulin, and antithymocyte globulin in order to accept donor-specific antibody (DSA)-positive lung transplants safely since 2008. There are no long-term data on the impact of this practice on allograft survival or the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). We extended our prior study to include long-term follow-up of 340 patients who received lung transplants between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2011. We compared allograft survival and CLAD-free survival among patients in three cohorts: DSA-positive, panel reactive antibody (PRA)-positive/DSA-negative, and unsensitized at the time of transplant. The median follow-up time in this extension study was 6.7 years. Among DSA-positive, PRA-positive/DSA-negative, and unsensitized patients, the median allograft survival was 8.4, 7.9, and 5.8 years, respectively (p = .5908), and the median CLAD-free survival was 6.8, 7.3, and 5.7 years, respectively (p = .5448). This follow-up study confirms that long-term allograft survival and CLAD-free survival of patients who undergo DSA-positive lung transplants with the use of our protocol do not differ from other lung transplant recipients. Use of protocols such as ours, therefore, may improve access to transplant for sensitized candidates.

Tocilizumab for severe COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients: a matched cohort study.

The safety and efficacy of tocilizumab for the treatment of severe respiratory symptoms due to COVID-19 remain uncertain, in particular among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Thus, we evaluated the clinical characteristics and outcomes of 29 hospitalized SOT recipients who received tocilizumab for severe COVID-19, compared to a matched control group who did not. Among a total of 117 total SOT recipients hospitalized with COVID-19, 29 (24.8%) received tocilizumab. The 90-day mortality was significantly higher among patients who received tocilizumab (41%) compared to those who did not (20%, P = .03). When compared to control patients matched by age, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and administration of high dose corticosteroids, there was no significant difference in mortality (41% vs 28%, P = .27), hospital discharge (52% vs 72%, P = .26), or secondary infections (34% vs 24%, P = .55). Among patients who received tocilizumab, there was also no difference in mortality based on the level of oxygen support (intubated vs not intubated) at the time of tocilizumab initiation. In this matched cohort study, tocilizumab appeared to be safe but was not associated with decreased 90-day mortality. Larger randomized studies are needed to identify whether there are subsets of SOT recipients who may benefit from tocilizumab for treatment of COVID-19.

COVID-19 in lung transplant recipients: A single center case series from New York City.

There are limited data describing COVID-19 in lung transplant recipients. We performed a single center, retrospective case series study of lung transplant patients followed by the Columbia Lung Transplant program who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March 19 and May 19, 2020. Thirty-two lung transplant patients developed mild (16%), moderate (44%), or severe (41%) COVID-19. The median age of patients was 65 years, and the median time from lung transplant was 5.6 years. Symptoms included cough (66%), dyspnea (50%), fever (47%), and gastrointestinal upset (44%). Patients received hydroxychloroquine (84%), azithromycin (75%), augmented steroids (44%), tocilizumab (19%), and remdesivir (9%). Eleven patients (34%) died at a median time of 14 days from admission. Complications during admission included: acute kidney injury (63%), transaminitis (31%), shock (31%), acute respiratory distress syndrome (25%), neurological events (25%), arrhythmias (22%), and venous thromboembolism (9%). Compared to patients with moderate COVID-19, patients with severe COVID-19 had higher peak white blood cell counts (15.8 vs 7 × 103 /uL, P = .019), C-reactive protein (198 vs. 107 mg/L, P = .010) and D-dimer (8.6 vs. 2.1 ug/mL, P = .004) levels, and lower nadir lymphocyte counts (0.09 vs. 0.4 × 103 /uL, P = .006). COVID-19 is associated with severe illness and a high mortality rate in lung transplant recipients.

COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients: Initial report from the US epicenter.

Solid organ transplant recipients may be at a high risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection and poor associated outcomes. We herein report our initial experience with solid organ transplant recipients with SARS-CoV-2 infection at two centers during the first 3 weeks of the outbreak in New York City. Baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, antiviral and immunosuppressive management were compared between patients with mild/moderate and severe disease (defined as ICU admission, intubation or death). Ninety patients were analyzed with a median age of 57 years. Forty-six were kidney recipients, 17 lung, 13 liver, 9 heart, and 5 dual-organ transplants. The most common presenting symptoms were fever (70%), cough (59%), and dyspnea (43%). Twenty-two (24%) had mild, 41 (46%) moderate, and 27 (30%) severe disease. Among the 68 hospitalized patients, 12% required non-rebreather and 35% required intubation. 91% received hydroxychloroquine, 66% azithromycin, 3% remdesivir, 21% tocilizumab, and 24% bolus steroids. Sixteen patients died (18% overall, 24% of hospitalized, 52% of ICU) and 37 (54%) were discharged. In this initial cohort, transplant recipients with COVID-19 appear to have more severe outcomes, although testing limitations likely led to undercounting of mild/asymptomatic cases. As this outbreak unfolds, COVID-19 has the potential to severely impact solid organ transplant recipients.

Skeletal muscle adiposity and outcomes in candidates for lung transplantation: a lung transplant body composition cohort study.

CT measurement of body composition may improve lung transplant candidate selection. We assessed whether skeletal muscle adipose deposition on abdominal and thigh CT scans was associated with 6 min walk distance (6MWD) and wait-list survival in lung transplant candidates. Each ½-SD decrease in abdominal muscle attenuation (indicating greater lipid content) was associated with 14 m decrease in 6MWD (95% CI -20 to -8) and 20% increased risk of death or delisting (95% CI 10% to 40%). Each ½-standard deviation decrease in thigh muscle attenuation was associated with 15 m decrease in 6MWD (95% CI -21 to -10). CT imaging may improve candidate risk stratification.

Preoperative expectations for health-related quality of life after lung transplant.

How patients' health-related quality of life (HRQL) after lung transplant compares to their preoperative expectations is unclear. As part of a previously published prospective cohort study, we compared 328 subjects' expectations for their post-transplant HQRL with and without chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) to their actual HRQL scores after transplant, using the visual analog scale (VAS) and standard gamble (SG). Subjects' expectations were considered met when the absolute difference between the expected and actual scores (the "expectation error") was <0.1 units, based on the minimally important difference for VAS and SG. On average, subjects' post-transplant HRQL without CLAD met their expectations (mean expectation error: -0.09 units [VAS] and +0.02 units [SG]) and subjects' post-transplant HRQL with CLAD met or exceeded their expectations (mean expectation error: +0.08 units [VAS] and +0.19 units [SG]). When subjects developed CLAD stages 1 and 2, their HRQL was better than they expected (mean expectation error of each disease group: >+0.1 units). When subjects developed CLAD stage 3, their HRQL was as they expected (mean expectation error of each disease group except COPD and CF: within ± 0.1 units). Patients' expectations for their HRQL after transplant are at least met and may be exceeded.

Comprehensive outcomes after lung retransplantation: A single-center review.

INTRODUCTION: Lung retransplantation is an important therapy for a growing population of lung transplant recipients with graft failure, but detailed outcome data are lacking. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult lung retransplant in the Toronto Lung Transplant Program from 2001 to 2013 (n = 38). We analyzed the postoperative course, graft function, renal function, microbiology, donor-specific antibodies (DSA), quality of life, and survival compared to a control cohort of primary transplant recipients matched for age and era. RESULTS: Indication for retransplant was chronic lung allograft dysfunction in most retransplant recipients (35/38, 92%). The postoperative course was more complex after retransplant than primary (ventilation time, 8 vs 2 days, P < .01; ICU stay 14 vs 4 days, P < 0.01), and peak lung function was lower (FEV1 2.2L vs 3L, P < .01). Quality of life scores were comparable, as were renal function, microbiology, and donor-specific antibody formation. Median survival was 1988 days after primary and 1475 days after retransplant (P = .39). CONCLUSIONS: Lung retransplantation is associated with a more complex postoperative course and lower peak lung function, but the long-term medical profile is similar to primary transplant. Lung retransplantation can be beneficial for carefully selected candidates with allograft failure.

Treatment of Late-onset Acute Graft-versus-host Disease Following Double Lung Transplantation Using a JAK2 Inhibitor.

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication that can occur after solid organ transplantation, particularly in organs with abundant lymphoid tissue like the liver and intestines. While less common in lung transplants, the rising numbers of these procedures have brought more attention to aGVHD, usually appearing within the first 3-mo posttransplant. Given its relative rarity, a clear understanding of the pathophysiology, risk factors, diagnostic, and management strategies remain elusive. These knowledge gaps can lead to delays in diagnosis and the initiation of appropriate treatment leading to predictably inferior outcomes. Managing aGVHD following solid organ transplantation is challenging, and there is no standard approach. Current management involves high-dose steroids and other immunosuppressive drugs. However, these interventions are associated with serious complications, including potentially fatal infections, underscoring the urgent need for more research to refine both diagnostic methods and treatment approaches and ultimately improving patient outcomes. In this report, we aim to deepen our understanding of aGVHD following lung transplants and share our experience with a unique case of aGVHD occurring almost a year after lung transplantation that was successfully managed using ruxolitinib, describing a potential treatment approach modeled on the contemporary management of stem cell transplant associated aGVHD.

Impact of intraoperative therapeutic plasma exchange on bleeding in lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Our program uses a desensitization protocol that includes intraoperative therapeutic plasma exchange (iTPE) for crossmatch-positive lung transplants, which improves access to lung transplant for sensitized candidates while mitigating immunologic risk. Although we have reported excellent outcomes for sensitized patients with the use of this protocol, concern for perioperative bleeding appears to have hindered broader adoption of it at other programs. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to quantify the impact of iTPE on perioperative bleeding in lung transplantation. METHODS: All first-time lung transplant recipients from 2014 to 2019 who received iTPE were compared to those who did not. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between iTPE and large-volume perioperative transfusion requirements (≥5 packed red blood cell units within 24 hours of transplant start), adjusted for disease type, transplant type, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or cardiopulmonary bypass use. The incidence of hemothorax (requiring reoperation within 7 days of lung transplant) and 30-day posttransplant mortality were compared between the 2 groups using chi-square test. RESULTS: One hundred forty-two patients (16%) received iTPE, and 755 patients (84%) did not. The mean number of perioperative pRBC transfusions was 4.2 among patients who received iTPE and 2.9 among patients who did not. iTPE was associated with increased odds of requiring large-volume perioperative transfusion (odds ratio 1.9; 95% confidence interval: 1.2-2.9, p-value = 0.007) but was not associated with an increased incidence of hemothorax (5% in both groups, p = 0.99) or 30-day posttransplant mortality (3.5% among patients who received iTPE vs 2.1% among patients who did not, p = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the use of iTPE in lung transplantation may increase perioperative bleeding but not to a degree that impacts important posttransplant outcomes.

The Lung Transplant Candidate, Indications, Timing, and Selection Criteria.

Lung transplantation can be lifesaving for patients with advanced lung disease. Demographics are evolving with recipients now sicker but determining candidacy remains predicated on one's underlying lung disease prognosis, along with the likelihood of posttransplant success. Determining optimal timing can be challenging, and most programs favor initiating the process early and proactively to allow time for patient education, informed decision-making, and preparation. A comprehensive, multidisciplinary evaluation is used to elucidate disease progrnosis and identify risk factors for poor posttransplant outcomes. Candidacy criteria vary significantly by center, and close communication between referring and transplant providers is necessary to improve access to transplant and outcomes.

Triaging donor lungs based on a microaspiration signature that predicts adverse recipient outcome.

BACKGROUND: Aspiration is a relative contraindication to accepting donor lungs for transplant and is currently assessed by visual inspection of the airways via bronchoscopy. However, this method is limited as it does not assess for microaspiration. Bile acids measured in large airway bronchial wash (LABW) samples have been shown to be a marker of aspiration in lung transplant recipients. Herein, we investigate the utility of measuring total bile acids (TBA) in donor LABW to predict performance of donor lungs and recipient outcomes. METHODS: TBA was measured in 605 consecutive lung donors at the Toronto Lung Transplant Program. TBA levels were compared in donor lungs deemed unsuitable for transplant, requiring further assessment on ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP), and those suitable for direct transplantation using Mann-Whitney-U tests. Relationships between LABW TBA concentrations and recipient outcomes were evaluated using multivariable Cox-PH models and log-rank analysis. RESULTS: Donor TBA was highest in lungs deemed unsuitable for transplant and correlated with clinical assessment of aspiration. LABW TBA concentration correlated with calcium, decreased pH, and increased pro-inflammatory mediators in EVLP perfusate. TBA cut-off of 1245 nM was able to differentiate donor lungs directly declined from those suitable for direct transplantation with a 91% specificity (AUROC: 73%). High donor TBA status was associated with the increased rate of primary graft dysfunction, longer time to extubation, and shorter time to chronic lung allograft dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: In a large retrospective cohort, we observed that donor LABW TBA was associated with suitability of donor lungs for transplant, performance of the organ on EVLP, and adverse recipient outcomes.

Oesophageal stasis is a risk factor for chronic lung allograft dysfunction and allograft failure in lung transplant recipients.

Background: Morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients are often triggered by recurrent aspiration events, potentiated by oesophageal and gastric disorders. Previous small studies have shown conflicting associations between oesophageal function and the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Herein, we sought to investigate the relationship between oesophageal motility disorders and long-term outcomes in a large retrospective cohort of lung transplant recipients. Methods: All lung transplant recipients at the Toronto Lung Transplant Program from 2012 to 2018 with available oesophageal manometry testing within the first 7 months post-transplant were included in this study. Patients were categorised according to the Chicago Classification of oesophageal disorders (v3.0). Associations between oesophageal motility disorders with the development of CLAD and allograft failure (defined as death or re-transplantation) were assessed. Results: Of 487 patients, 57 (12%) had oesophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (OGJOO) and 47 (10%) had a disorder of peristalsis (eight major, 39 minor). In a multivariable analysis, OGJOO was associated with an increased risk of CLAD (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.15-2.55, p=0.008) and allograft failure (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.13-2.53, p=0.01). Major disorders of peristalsis were associated with an increased risk of CLAD (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.01-2.37, p=0.04) and allograft failure (HR 3.33, 95% CI 1.53-7.25, p=0.002). Minor disorders of peristalsis were not significantly associated with CLAD or allograft failure. Conclusion: Lung transplant recipients with oesophageal stasis characterised by OGJOO or major disorders of peristalsis were at an increased risk of adverse long-term outcomes. These findings will help with risk stratification of lung transplant recipients and personalisation of treatment for aspiration prevention.

Geographic disparities in lung transplantation in the United States before and after the November 2017 allocation change.

BACKGROUND: The primary lung allocation unit was expanded from the donation service area to a 250-mile radius in 2017. Prior to the change, geographic disparities in donor lung availability impacted waitlist outcomes. We sought to determine if the new allocation system improved these disparities. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing the 2-year period before and after the change. Donor lung availability was defined as the ratio of donor lungs to waitlist candidates in the primary allocation unit. Transplant centers were divided into quartiles by donor lung availability. Multivariable competing risk models were used to determine the association between lung availability and waitlist outcomes. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models compared post-transplant survival. RESULTS: Prior to the allocation change, the unadjusted transplant rate at centers in the lowest and highest quartiles was 132 and 607 transplants per 100 waitlist years. Candidates in the lowest quartile of donor lung availability had a 61% adjusted lower transplantation rate compared to candidates in highest quartile (sub-hazard ratio [sHR]: 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34-0.44). After the allocation change, the disparity decreased resulting in an unadjusted transplant rate of 141 and 309 among centers in the lowest and highest quartiles. Candidates in the lowest quartile had a 38% adjusted lower transplantation rate compared to those in the highest (sHR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.57-0.68). There was no significant difference in 1-year post-transplant survival. CONCLUSIONS: Although the expansion of the primary allocation unit improved disparities in waitlist outcomes without any change in post-transplant survival, there still remain significant differences due to geography.

Identification of Lung Transplant Recipients With a Survival Benefit After Fundoplication.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and aspiration of enteric contents are associated with worse outcomes after lung transplantation. The purpose of this study was to elucidate populations of patients who benefit the most from fundoplication after lung transplantation. METHODS: Lung transplantations from 2001 to 2019 (n = 971) were retrospectively reviewed and stratified by fundoplication before (n = 128) or after (n = 24) chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) development vs patients who did not undergo fundoplication. Patients with a fundoplication before CLAD were propensity matched to patients without a fundoplication. The primary outcome of interest was posttransplant survival. Time-to-event rates were calculated using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model and Kaplan-Meier functions. RESULTS: Fundoplication before CLAD improved posttransplant survival before and after propensity matching, and it remained a significant predictor after adjusting for baseline characteristics (hazard ratio [HR],0.57; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.4 to 0.8; P = .001). Transplant recipients with a restrictive disorder (HR, 0.46; 95 % CI, 0.3 to 0.73; P = .001), age younger than 65 years (HR, 0.48; 95 % CI, 0.32 to 0.71; P < ;0.001), and with both single (HR, 0.47; 95 % CI, 0.28 to 0.79; P = .005) and double (HR, 0.55; 95 % CI, 0.32 to 0.93; P = .027) lung transplants had a significant decrease in mortality after fundoplication. The effect was present after excluding early deaths and CLAD diagnoses. Gastroesophageal reflux disease diagnosed by pH, impedance, or esophagogastroduodenoscopy was not associated with worse outcomes. Among patients with CLAD, a fundoplication was an independent predictor of post-CLAD survival (HR, 0.27; 95 % CI; 0.12 to 0.61; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Fundoplication before or after CLAD development is an independent predictor of survival. Younger patients with restrictive disease, independent of the type of transplant, have a survival benefit. Gastroesophageal reflux disease diagnosed by conventional methods was not associated with worse survival.

Feasibility of a Home-Based Exercise Program for Managing Posttransplant Metabolic Syndrome in Lung and Liver Transplant Recipients: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Posttransplant metabolic syndrome (PTMS) is a common contributor to morbidity and mortality among solid organ transplant recipients in the late posttransplant period (≥1 year). Patients diagnosed with PTMS are at a higher risk of cardiovascular disease and frequently experience decreased physical function and health-related quality of life (HRQL). Studies in the early posttransplant period (<1 year) have shown the benefits of facility-based exercise training on physical function and HRQL, but have not evaluated the effects on metabolic risk factors. It remains unclear whether home-based exercise programs are feasible and can be delivered at a sufficient exercise dose to have effects on PTMS. This protocol outlines the methodology of a randomized controlled trial of a partly supervised home-based exercise program in lung transplant (LTx) and orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the feasibility (ie, recruitment rate, program adherence, attrition, safety, and participant satisfaction) of a 12-week individualized, home-based aerobic and resistance training program in LTx and OLT recipients initiated 12 to 18 months after transplantation, and to assess estimates of intervention efficacy on metabolic risk factors, exercise self-efficacy, and HRQL. METHODS: In total, 20 LTx and 20 OLT recipients with ≥2 cardiometabolic risk factors at 12 to 18 months after transplantation will be randomized to an intervention (home-based exercise training) or control group. The intervention group will receive an individualized exercise prescription comprising aerobic and resistance training, 3 to 5 times a week for 12 weeks. Participants will meet on a weekly basis (via videoconference) with a qualified exercise professional who will supervise exercise progression, provide support, and support exercise self-efficacy. Participants in both study groups will receive a counseling session on healthy eating with a dietitian at the beginning of the intervention. For the primary aim, feasibility will be assessed through recruitment rate, program adherence, satisfaction, attrition, and safety parameters. Secondary outcomes will be measured at baseline and 12 weeks, including assessments of metabolic risk factors (ie, insulin resistance, abdominal obesity, blood pressure, and cholesterol), HRQL, and exercise self-efficacy. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize program feasibility and effect estimates (means and 95% CIs) for sample size calculations in future trials. RESULTS: Enrollment started in July 2021. It is estimated that the study period will be 18 months, with data collection to be completed by December 2022. CONCLUSIONS: A partly supervised home-based, individually tailored exercise program that promotes aerobic and resistance training and exercise self-efficacy may be an important intervention for improving the metabolic profile of LTx and OLT recipients with cardiometabolic risk factors. Thus, characterizing the feasibility and effect estimates of home-based exercise constitutes the first step in developing future clinical trials designed to reduce the high morbidity associated with PTMS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04965142; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04965142. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/35700.

Geographic Differences in Lung Transplant Volume and Donor Availability During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Regional variation in lung transplantation practices due to local coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prevalence may cause geographic disparities in access to lung transplantation. METHODS: Using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry, we conducted a descriptive analysis of lung transplant volume, donor lung volume, new waitlist activations, and waiting list deaths at high-volume lung transplant centers during the first 3 months of the pandemic (March 1. 2020, to May 30, 2020) and we compared it to the same period in the preceding 5 years. RESULTS: Lung transplant volume decreased by 10% nationally and by a median of 50% in high COVID-19 prevalence centers (range -87% to 80%) compared with a median increase of 10% (range -87% to 80%) in low prevalence centers (P-for-trend 0.006). Donation services areas with high COVID-19 prevalence experienced a greater decrease in organ availability (-28% range, -72% to -11%) compared with low prevalence areas (+7%, range -20% to + 55%, P-for-trend 0.001). Waiting list activations decreased at 18 of 22 centers. Waiting list deaths were similar to the preceding 5 years and independent of local COVID-19 prevalence (P-for-trend 0.36). CONCLUSIONS: Regional variation in transplantation and donor availability in the early months of the pandemic varied by local COVID-19 activity.