Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Vox Sang ; 107(3): 254-60, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24806328

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of pathogen inactivation (PI) in non-leucoreduced platelet-rich plasma-derived platelets suspended in plasma using the Mirasol PRT System and the Intercept Blood System. METHODS: Platelets were pooled using the Acrodose PL system and separated into two aliquots for Mirasol and Intercept treatment. Four replicates of each viral strain were used for the evaluation. For bacteria, both low-titre (45-152 CFU/unit) inoculation and high-titre (7·34-10·18 log CFU/unit) inoculation with two replicates for each bacterial strain were used. Platelets with non-detectable bacterial growth and platelets inoculated with a low titre were stored for 5 days, and culture was performed with the BacT/ALERT system. RESULTS: The inactivation efficacy expressed as log reduction for Mirasol and Intercept systems for viruses was as follows: human immunodeficiency virus 1, ≥4·19 vs. ≥4·23; bovine viral diarrhoea virus, 1·83 vs. ≥6·03; pseudorabies virus, 2·73 vs. ≥5·20; hepatitis A virus, 0·62 vs. 0·76; and porcine parvovirus, 0·28 vs. 0·38. The inactivation efficacy for bacteria was as follows: Escherichia coli, 5·45 vs. ≥9·22; Staphylococcus aureus, 4·26 vs. ≥10·11; and Bacillus subtilis, 5·09 vs. ≥7·74. Postinactivation bacterial growth in platelets inoculated with a low titre of S. aureus or B. subtilis was detected only with Mirasol. CONCLUSION: Pathogen inactivation efficacy of Intercept for enveloped viruses was found to be satisfactory. Mirasol showed satisfactory inactivation efficacy for HIV-1 only. The two selected non-enveloped viruses were not inactivated by both systems. Inactivation efficacy of Intercept was more robust for all bacteria tested at high or low titres.


Subject(s)
Blood Platelets/microbiology , Blood-Borne Pathogens/isolation & purification , Platelet-Rich Plasma/microbiology , Virus Inactivation , Bacillus subtilis/isolation & purification , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Blood Platelets/virology , HIV-1/isolation & purification , Humans , Microbial Viability , Platelet-Rich Plasma/virology , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Viruses/isolation & purification
2.
Vet Microbiol ; 75(2): 199-204, 2000 Jul 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10889410

ABSTRACT

In an effort to develop genetically engineered Brucella abortus (BA) vaccines, the genes encoding heat shock proteins (HSPs) GroEL, GroES, and HtrA were cloned and expressed in the BAC-TO-BAC Baculovirus System, and the kinetics of protein expression were analyzed using various insect cell lines in suspension cultures, different cell densities in suspension cultures, multiplicities of infection and recombinant virus replication times. Trichoplusia ni cells expressed only BA HtrA, but Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf9) cells expressed all three recombinant proteins. The best GroEL expression was achieved by infecting 2x10(6) Sf9 cells/ml with an MOI 10 of recombinant virus and harvesting the cells after 96h of virus replication. GroES and HtrA were best expressed when infecting 2x10(6) Sf9 cells/ml with an MOI 1 of recombinant viruses and harvesting the cells after 120h of virus replications. Under these conditions BA recombinant HSPs were expressed as follows: GroEL at 16% of the total cellular proteins (105microg/ml concentration); GroES 2% (15.25microg/ml); and HtrA 8% (84.48microg/ml). This is the first report of cloning and expression of BA genes in the baculovirus system.


Subject(s)
Brucella abortus/immunology , Brucellosis, Bovine/immunology , Heat-Shock Proteins/immunology , Periplasmic Proteins , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal , Bacterial Proteins/chemistry , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Bacterial Proteins/immunology , Bacterial Vaccines/immunology , Blotting, Southern/veterinary , Blotting, Western/veterinary , Brucella abortus/genetics , Brucellosis, Bovine/prevention & control , Cattle , Cell Line , Chaperonin 10/chemistry , Chaperonin 10/genetics , Chaperonin 10/immunology , Chaperonin 60/chemistry , Chaperonin 60/genetics , Chaperonin 60/immunology , Cloning, Molecular , Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel/veterinary , Female , Heat-Shock Proteins/chemistry , Heat-Shock Proteins/genetics , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/chemistry , Serine Endopeptidases/chemistry , Serine Endopeptidases/genetics , Serine Endopeptidases/immunology , Spodoptera
3.
Vet Microbiol ; 88(2): 189-202, 2002 Aug 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12135637

ABSTRACT

Brucella abortus resists the microbicidal mechanisms of macrophages, and the expression of its heat shock proteins (HSPs) such as GroEL, GroES and HtrA may play a role in this resistance. Bacterial HSPs can be very immunogenic, inducing protective immunity in various types of bacterial infections. However, the significance of immune responses directed against B. abortus HSPs in the protection against brucellosis is currently unresolved. To elucidate the role of these proteins in protection against Brucella challenge, individual, divalent or trivalent baculovirus (BV) recombinants of B. abortus GroEL, GroES and/or HtrA were injected into BALB/c mice either as protein-expressing whole cells or as purified proteins. The preparations were given to mice in combination with Freund's or Ribi adjuvant, respectively. In addition, some mice were primed with a vaccinia virus-GroEL recombinant, followed by inoculation with purified GroEL-Ribi adjuvant combination. Antibodies were observed against B. abortus GroEL and HtrA, but not against GroES. Cellular immune response was demonstrated by observing significant IFN-gamma release by lymphocytes of mice immunized with the purified HtrA-Ribi adjuvant combination. However, none of the mice inoculated with individual, divalent or trivalent HSP-expressing cells combined with complete Freund's adjuvant or inoculated with purified B. abortus HSPs combined with Ribi adjuvant, were protected against challenge with B. abortus virulent strain 2308. Priming with vaccinia virus-GroEL recombinant and boosting with GroEL-Ribi combination did not induce protective immunity. Based on the results obtained, we suggest that although humoral and cell-mediated immune responses are induced, but protective immune response is not induced by B. abortus HSPs.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bacterial/biosynthesis , Bacterial Vaccines/immunology , Brucella abortus/immunology , Heat-Shock Proteins/immunology , Animals , Baculoviridae , Brucellosis/prevention & control , Chaperonin 10/immunology , Chaperonin 60/immunology , Female , Immunity, Cellular , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Periplasmic Proteins/immunology , Serine Endopeptidases/immunology , Vaccination , Vaccines, Synthetic/immunology , Vaccinia virus
4.
Environ Geochem Health ; 27(3): 229-35, 2005 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16059779

ABSTRACT

The microbial leaching process was evaluated for the treatment of synthetic sediments contaminated with cadmium and nickel sulfides. A series of batch leaching experiments was conducted to compare metal solubilization in sediment inoculated with Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans -inoculated sediments to that in sterile control sediment. The rate and extent of metal solubilization were significantly higher in A. ferrooxidans -inoculated reactors than in acidified sterile reactors. The efficiency of cadmium (Cd) solubilization (80) in the bioleaching process was higher than that of nickel (Ni) solubilization (60). The performance of leaching reactors containing only culture supernatants was comparable to that of A. ferrooxidans -inoculated reactors, indicating that indirect non-contact leaching by the products of microbial metabolism is the predominant mechanism for metal solubilization rather than direct microbial sulfide oxidation. Moreover, the similar (60-75%) extents of Cd(2+) leaching with A. ferrooxidans , cell-free filtrate, and Fe(3+) suggest that abiotic oxidation of CdS by Fe(3+) controls the overall leaching rate, and the role of A. ferrooxidans is most likely not to oxidize CdS mineral directly but to regenerate Fe(3+) as an oxidant.


Subject(s)
Acidithiobacillus/physiology , Cadmium/metabolism , Nickel/metabolism , Water Pollutants/metabolism , Geologic Sediments/chemistry , Oxidation-Reduction , Solubility
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL