Sleep disordered breathing in women of childbearing age & during pregnancy.

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) affects 11 per cent of pre-menopausal women though it often remains undetected. Women may present differently than men, and the classic findings of snoring, witnessed apnoeas and sleepiness may not be observed. Factors which predispose to OSA include polycystic ovarian syndrome, obesity, retromicrognathia, and hypothyroidism. OSA may contribute to neurocognitive dysfunction, depression, hypertension and metabolic syndrome. Emerging evidence indicates that snoring and OSA increase during pregnancy. For normal women with normotensive, low-risk pregnancies the prevalence of OSA is very low. Among normotensive pregnant women with high risk pregnancies, the prevalence of OSA is high and is even higher among those with gestational hypertension/preeclampsia during pregnancy. Incident snoring, which is a marker for OSA, is associated with an increased risk of developing gestational hypertension. Recent studies indicate that OSA per se is an independent risk factor for gestational hypertension/pre-eclampsia and may contribute to other poor obstetrical outcomes. The diagnostic test of choice for OSA is a polysomnography with electroencephalogram. Milder degree of disease than what is usually considered clinically significant among men or non-pregnant women appears to be relevant for foetomaternal outcomes. There seems to be benefit for blood pressure control to treating even milder degrees of OSA with CPAP, both acutely and over the 9 months of pregnancy. Chronic hypertensive women should be strongly considered for diagnosis and treatment of OSA prior to or beginning as early as possible in pregnancy to help maintain blood pressure control. Increasing awareness of OSA among maternal health care providers is important given the potential benefits for pregnancy and other health-related outcomes associated with identification and treatment of OSA.

An in vitro study on the effects of freezing, spine segment, repeat measurement, and individual cord properties on cord interstitial pressure.

STUDY DESIGN: In vitro study of the spinal cord tension and pressure relationships before and after thawing in 6 different spinal cord segment from 2 individual pigs. OBJECTIVES: To determine if frozen and thawed spinal cord segments had different tension/cord interstitial pressure(CIP) relationships to fresh spinal cord segments. In addition, we will determine if the cord level, individual cord properties, and repeated CIP measurements affect the tension/CIP relationships. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spinal cord distraction is a known cause of spinal cord injury. Several articles published on the pathophysiology of the cord distraction injury suggest that the underlying mechanism of injury is a microvascular ischemic event. We have previously described an increase in CIP with spinal cord distraction, pressures average 23 mmHg at 1 kg loads. METHODS: Six cord segments harvested from 2 pigs contained cervical, thoracic, and lumbar segments, and underwent distraction using a series of 7 calibrated weights from 0 to 1000 g weight. The cords were measured at each level of distraction. The cords were then frozen at -20 degrees C for a period of 2 weeks, and then thawed and retested. Multiple linear regression was then performed. RESULTS: There was no difference between the fresh and the frozen-thawed cords; there was statistical difference between the 2 pigs (18 mmHg) (P < 0.001). There are differences between the cervical and the thoracic cord segments (P < 0.001), and between cervical and lumbar cord segments (P = 0.056). There is a significant relation between the tension applied and CIP. Repeated trials showed no drift with repeated measures. CONCLUSION: Freezing and thawing spinal cords has no effect on the CIP/tension curves. Cord interstitial pressure developed is dependant on cord tension, cord level, individual cord properties, but not on the number of repetitions carried out while testing the spinal cord.

Sensitivities of antigen detection and PCR assays greatly increased compared to that of the standard culture method for screening for group B streptococcus carriage in pregnant women.

Group B streptococcus (GBS) is a major cause of serious infections in neonates. The 2002 revised guidelines of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for the prevention of perinatal GBS disease recommend that all pregnant women be screened for GBS carriage at between 35 and 37 weeks of gestation and that intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis be given to carriers. We studied the performances of four different GBS detection assays in the context of antenatal screening. Between May and August 2004, the 605 vaginorectal swab specimens received at our bacteriology laboratory for GBS antenatal detection were tested by the four assays. The standard culture method was done according to the CDC recommendations. The three experimental assays performed with the growth from the selective enrichment (LIM) broth (Todd-Hewitt broth with 15 mug/ml nalidixic acid and 10 mug/ml colistin) after overnight incubation were a GBS antigen detection assay (PathoDx) and two PCR assays (for cfb and scpB). The most accurate assay was the scpB PCR (sensitivity, 99.6%; specificity, 100%), followed by the cfb PCR (sensitivity, 75.3%; specificity, 100%), GBS antigen detection (sensitivity, 57.3%; specificity, 99.5%), and standard culture (sensitivity, 42.3%; specificity, 100%). The GBS antigen detection assay was found to be more sensitive than the standard culture method, and moreover, the assay has a low cost and is easy to perform in all obstetrical centers which have access to the most basic of diagnostic microbiology services. We believe that antigen detection on incubated LIM broth should replace the standard culture method for screening for GBS carriage at 35 to 37 weeks of gestation. The impact of the greater sensitivities of PCR assays on the diminution of neonatal GBS infections remains to be demonstrated.