ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Divergence between intra-arterial catheters blood pressure (ABP) and noninvasive oscillometry (NIBP) may affect the care of children with brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs). We described the agreement between ABP and NIBP in these children. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit between 2017 and 2023 with bAVM rupture. Paired ABP and NIBP measurements were collected. Bland-Altman analyses were used to assess agreement. Correlation analysis was conducted between higher ABP and divergence between systolic BP (SBP) measurements. Hypertension was defined as mean arterial pressure (MAP) exceeding age-based 95th percentile. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients with 1901 BP pairs were observed. Bias overall was acceptable, but standard deviation (SD) was high. The best agreement of MAP was in non-hypertensive (bias 1.23â¯mmHg, SD 8.03â¯mmHg) and radial arterial catheters (bias 1.83â¯mmHg, SD 9.08â¯mmHg) subgroups. Bias for SBP was higher in hypertension (10.98â¯mmHg) and in infratentorial bAVMs (7.42â¯mmHg), suggesting poorer agreement in these subgroups. There were significant correlations between intra-arterial MAP and SBP divergence (R = +0.346, p<.001) and between intra-arterial SBP and SBP divergence (R = +0.677, p<.001), suggesting divergence widens with higher BP. Around 25â¯% of measurement pairs diverged to where one measurement crossed the clinical threshold for treatment, while the other did not, with ABP being more frequently higher than NIBP. CONCLUSIONS: There is good agreement between ABP and NIBP, particularly in non-hypertensive ranges and with radial arterial catheters. Measurements, however, diverge in hypertension. Further research must define age-based thresholds, validate methods of BP measurement, and determine the effect of BP reduction on outcomes in these children.
Subject(s)
Arterial Pressure , Blood Pressure Determination , Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations , Oscillometry , Humans , Child , Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations/physiopathology , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Blood Pressure Determination/methods , Adolescent , Arterial Pressure/physiology , Oscillometry/methods , Child, Preschool , Hypertension/physiopathology , Blood Pressure/physiologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: this study was conducted to compare the quantity of intercondylar bone removed during femoral box osteotomy for implantation of three contemporary posterior stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty designs: Sigma PS (DePuy), Vanguard (Biomet) and Persona (Zimmer). METHODS: we compared the maximum volumetric bone resection required for the housing of the PS mechanism of these three designs. Bone removal by each PS box cutting jig was three-dimensionally measured. The differences between the three designs were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used for pairwise comparisons. The level of significance was set at p<0.05. RESULTS: for small-size implants, the average box osteotomy volume of Persona was significantly smaller than the Vanguard and Sigma PS volumes (p=0.003). The mean difference between Vanguard and Sigma PS (p=0.01) was also significant. For medium size implants, the mean difference between Persona and Sigma PS (p=0.008) and the mean difference between Vanguard and Sigma PS (p=0.01) were statistically significant. For large size implants, the mean difference between Vanguard and Sigma PS (p=0.01) and the mean difference between Sigma PS and Persona (p=0.008) were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: irrespective of implant size, the Persona cutting jig always resected significantly less bone than did Vanguard and Sigma PS. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: although this study does not establish any clinical relevance of removing more or less bone at primary TKA, its results suggest that if a PS design is indicated, it is preferable to select a model which resects less distal femoral bone.