Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Anat ; 217(1): 57-66, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20492430

ABSTRACT

Mucins are high molecular weight glycoproteins which constitute the major component of the mucus layer and are produce by many epithelial tissues in vertebrates. Osteopontin (OPN) is an adhesive phosphorylated glycoprotein that is expressed by a broad range of tissues and cells. Although gastric mucins MUC1, MUC5AC, MUC6 and OPN have been widely used in histological studies and in diagnostic pathology in order to diagnose gastric carcinomas, their localizations in the stomach of quail have not yet been studied. In this study, the localizations of MUC1, MUC5AC, MUC6 and OPN in the proventriculus and gizzard of Japanese quail during the post-hatching period were compared at light microscope levels by applying immunohistochemical methods. In all ages studied, the immunoreactivity of MUC5AC was present in the lining epithelium of both folds and superficial proventricular glands in the proventriculus, whereas MUC1, MUC6 and OPN reactivity was found in the oxynticopeptic cells of profound proventricular glands. In addition, some cells in the fold epithelium of the proventriculus showed a positive reaction to OPN. The immunoreactivity of MUC1 in gizzard was different from that of MUC5AC. Although MUC5AC was expressed in the cells of both the surface epithelium and profound glands of the gizzard, MUC1 was only localized in the profound glands of the gizzard. However, MUC6 and OPN immunoreactivity was absent in the gizzard. The results indicated that the differences between the localizations of MUC1, MUC5AC, MUC6 and OPN in quail proventriculus and gizzard may be a reflection of functional differences of stomach parts. Although the biological significances of the expressions of MUC1, MUC5AC, MUC6 and OPN in the quail stomach remains unknown, these notable glycoproteins may be associated with barrier function, host defence, and/or secretion.


Subject(s)
Coturnix/metabolism , Gizzard, Avian/metabolism , Mucins/metabolism , Osteopontin/metabolism , Proventriculus/metabolism , Animals , Coturnix/physiology , Gastric Mucosa/metabolism , Gizzard, Avian/physiology , Male , Mucin 5AC/metabolism , Mucin-1/metabolism , Mucin-6/metabolism , Proventriculus/physiology
2.
Scand J Urol Nephrol ; 44(4): 212-6, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20377490

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pain score during transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy using three different anaesthetic applications and no anaesthesia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One-hundred men undergoing TRUS-guided prostate biopsy were prospectively enrolled in this study. Patients were randomized to four groups. Group 1 (n = 25) received no anaesthesia, group 2 (n = 25) was administered a perianal lidocaine injection, group 3 (n = 25) was administered a periprostatic lidocaine injection, and group 4 (n = 25) was administered a combination of perianal-intrarectal lidocaine-prilocaine cream. The anaesthetic application was given 5 min before the procedure. All patients were asked to indicate the level of pain experienced on a visual analogue scale (VAS) during three situations, including when the TRUS probe was inserted and 15 min and 2 weeks after biopsy. RESULTS: Mean pain scores were similar in all groups at the time of probe insertion. Mean pain scores showed statistically significant differences between group 1 and the other groups, except for group 4, 15 min after the procedure. Group 3 showed better pain control 15 min after biopsy and this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.043).The VAS scores were similar 2 weeks after the procedure in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Anaesthetic application before TRUS-guided prostate biopsy may be advocated. The application of periprostatic lidocaine seems to be the most advantageous method for lowering the perception of pain.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Pain Measurement/methods , Prostate/diagnostic imaging , Prostate/pathology , Administration, Topical , Aged , Anesthetics, Combined , Biopsy , Humans , Injections , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Prilocaine/administration & dosage , Ultrasonography
3.
Lab Anim ; 36(1): 51-60, 2002 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11831739

ABSTRACT

An investigation was made as to whether the sexual cycle and pregnancy can be determined by means of vaginal smear in chinchillas. This study represents the first attempt to record changes which occur in the pattern of exfoliated cells in chinchilla's vaginal smear during anoestrus, proestrus, oestrus, metoestrus and pregnancy. Fifteen female chinchillas aged from 8 months to 3 years and bred through harem breeding method were used. The major change during proestrus was an increase in the proportion of superficial cells, with a corresponding decrease in other cells. Goblet cells were observed in the smears prepared by strong aspiration during this cycle. Neutrophils, small and large intermediates and parabasal cells were not found in the smear during oestrus and the smear consisted of superficial cells only. In the proportion of neutrophils, small and large intermediates and parabasal cells increased during metoestrus. In addition, metoestrum and foam cells were found in this cycle. In anoestrus; superficial and parabasal cells were present in small numbers. Also small and large intermediate cells as well as neutrophils were present. Traces of foam and metoestrum cells were found. During pregnancy, neutrophils generally of medium density were present, parabasal; small and large intermediate cells were present at low or medium density, and superficial cells were only present in trace amounts.


Subject(s)
Chinchilla/physiology , Estrous Cycle/physiology , Pregnancy, Animal/physiology , Vaginal Smears/veterinary , Animals , Female , Pregnancy , Staining and Labeling/methods , Vaginal Smears/classification , Vaginal Smears/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL