Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 40
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Phytother Res ; 35(8): 4456-4484, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34132429

ABSTRACT

Traditional Indian medical practices (Ayurveda, Siddha, Unani, and homeopathy) are a vast reservoir of knowledge about medicinal plants. The promising pharmacological properties of these plants have paved the way for developing therapy against novel Coronavirus (CoV) infection. The current review will summarize published works of literature on the effects of traditional Indian medicinal plants against acute respiratory infection (COVID-19, SARS, Influenza, and Respiratory syncytial virus infection) and registered clinical trials of traditional Indian herbal medicines in COVID-19. The current study aims to comprehensively evaluate the data of traditional Indian medicinal plants to warrant their use in COVID-19 management. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched along with different clinical trial databases. A total of 22 relevant traditional Indian medicinal plants (35 relevant studies) were included in the current study having potential antiviral properties against virus-induced respiratory illness along with promising immunomodulatory and thrombolytic properties. Further, 36 randomized and nonrandomized registered clinical trials were also included that were aimed at evaluating the efficacy of herbal plants or their formulations in COVID-19 management. The antiviral, immunomodulatory, and thrombolytic activities of the traditional Indian medicinal plants laid down a strong rationale for their use in developing therapies against SARS-CoV-2 infection. The study identified some important potential traditional Indian medicinal herbs such as Ocimum tenuiflorum, Tinospora cordifolia, Achyranthes bidentata, Cinnamomum cassia, Cydonia oblonga, Embelin ribes, Justicia adhatoda, Momordica charantia, Withania somnifera, Zingiber officinale, Camphor, and Kabusura kudineer, which could be used in therapeutic strategies against SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Medicine, Ayurvedic , Plant Preparations/therapeutic use , Plants, Medicinal , Humans , India , Plants, Medicinal/chemistry , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
2.
Inflammopharmacology ; 29(6): 1669-1681, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34813026

ABSTRACT

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a major contributor of dementia leading to the degeneration of neurons in the brain with major symptoms like loss of memory and learning. Many evidences suggest the involvement of neuroinflammation in the pathology of AD. Cytokines including TNF-α and IL-6 are also found increasing the BACE1 activity and expression of NFκB resulting in generation of Aß in AD brain. Following the interaction of Aß with microglia and astrocytes, other inflammatory molecules also get translocated to the site of inflammation by chemotaxis and exaggerate neuroinflammation. Various pathways like NFκB, p38 MAPK, Akt/mTOR, caspase, nitric oxide and COX trigger microglia to release inflammatory cytokines. PPARγ agonists like pioglitazone increases the phagocytosis of Aß and reduces inflammatory cytokine IL-1ß. Celecoxib and roficoxib like selective COX-2 inhibitors also ameliorate neuroinflammation. Non-selective COX inhibitor indomethacin is also potent inhibitor of inflammatory mediators released from microglia. Mitophagy process is considered quite helpful in reducing inflammation due to microglia as it promotes the phagocytosis of over activated microglial cells and other inflammatory cells. Mitophagy induction is also beneficial in the removal of damaged mitochondria and reduction of infiltration of inflammatory molecules at the site of accumulation of the damaged mitochondria. Targeting these pathways and eventually ameliorating the activation of microglia can mitigate neuroinflammation and come out as a better therapeutic option for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Neuroinflammatory Diseases/drug therapy , Alzheimer Disease/physiopathology , Animals , Cytokines/metabolism , Humans , Inflammation/drug therapy , Inflammation/physiopathology , Inflammation Mediators/metabolism , Mitochondria/pathology , Mitophagy/drug effects , Neuroinflammatory Diseases/physiopathology
3.
J Med Virol ; 92(7): 776-785, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32297988

ABSTRACT

Following the demonstration of the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in vitro, many trials started to evaluate its efficacy in clinical settings. However, no systematic review and meta-analysis have addressed the issue of the safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in coronavirus disease 2019. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with the objectives of evaluation of safety and efficacy of HCQ alone or in combination in terms of "time to clinical cure," "virological cure," "death or clinical worsening of disease," "radiological progression," and safety. RevMan was used for meta-analysis. We searched 16 literature databases out of which seven studies (n = 1358) were included in the systematic review. In terms of clinical cure, two studies reported possible benefit in "time to body temperature normalization" and one study reported less "cough days" in the HCQ arm. Treatment with HCQ resulted in less number of cases showing the radiological progression of lung disease (odds ratio [OR], 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.9). No difference was observed in virological cure (OR, 2.37, 95% CI, 0.13-44.53), death or clinical worsening of disease (OR, 1.37, 95% CI, 1.37-21.97), and safety (OR, 2.19, 95% CI, 0.59-8.18), when compared with the control/conventional treatment. Five studies reported either the safety or efficacy of HCQ + azithromycin. Although seems safe and effective, more data are required for a definitive conclusion. HCQ seems to be promising in terms of less number of cases with radiological progression with a comparable safety profile to control/conventional treatment. We need more data to come to a definite conclusion.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Azithromycin/therapeutic use , Betacoronavirus/drug effects , Betacoronavirus/growth & development , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , COVID-19 , Clinical Trials as Topic , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/metabolism , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/metabolism , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome , Viral Load/drug effects , Virus Replication/drug effects
8.
Trop Parasitol ; 13(1): 65-67, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37415752

ABSTRACT

We present a unique case of asymptomatic NCC that was accidently diagnosed on radiological investigations after a road traffic accident. An Ophthalmologic consult was sought to rule out intraocular or optic nerve cysticercosis. Fundoscopy showed multiple white-pale yellow lesions in the right eye which on ultrasonography confirmed cyst lined by a cyst wall consistent with subretinal cysticercosis. The patient was treated with diode laser photocoagulation. A high index of suspicion is required to diagnose NCCin endemic areas. In the right eye which on ultrasonography confirmed cyst lined by a cyst wall consistent with subretinal cysticercosis. The patient was treated with diode laser photocoagulation.

9.
Indian J Pharmacol ; 55(2): 133-137, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37313939

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Aspirin is indicated in the emergency management of acute coronary syndrome. However, oral aspirin has erratic bioavailability compared to i.v. formulation. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) and oral aspirin in acute coronary syndrome. STUDY DESIGN: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis. RESULTS: Two randomized controlled trials were included. Compared to oral aspirin, lower platelet aggregability was seen with IV aspirin at 5 min and 20 min. Lower thromboxane B2 and lower platelet CD-62p levels were noted in the IV group; however, no significant difference was observed in terms of "composite cardiovascular death, stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI) at 4-6 weeks," "any cause mortality," "cardiovascular mortality," "occurrence of stroke," and "occurrence of MI/reinfarction." However, no difference was noted in terms of the occurrence of serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: IV aspirin showed some advantages in terms of platelet aggregability biomarkers at 20 min and 1 week with comparable safety to oral aspirin. No difference was seen in terms of clinical outcomes (at 24 h, 7, and 30 days) and the occurrence of serious adverse events.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Stroke , Humans , Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Administration, Intravenous , Stroke/drug therapy , Stroke/prevention & control
10.
Heliyon ; 9(6): e16813, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37303517

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study is to comprehensively analyze previous viral vaccine programs and identify potential challenges and effective measures for the COVID-19 vaccine program. Previous viral vaccine programs, such as those for HIV, Zika, Influenza, Ebola, Dengue, SARS, and MERS, were evaluated. Paramount challenges were identified, including quasi-species, cross-reactivity, duration of immunity, revaccination, mutation, immunosenescence, and adverse events related to viral vaccines. Although a large population has been vaccinated, mutations in SARS-CoV-2 and adverse events related to vaccines pose significant challenges. Previous vaccine programs have taught us that predicting the final outcome of the current vaccine program for COVID-19 cannot be determined at a given state. Long-term follow-up studies are essential. Validated preclinical studies, long-term follow-up studies, alternative therapeutic approaches, and alternative vaccines are necessary.

11.
Taiwan J Ophthalmol ; 13(2): 191-202, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37484615

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and outcomes of corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) and different CXL protocols in progressive keratoconus (PK) population at short and long-term. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. A total of eight literature databases were searched (up to February 15, 2022). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CXL versus placebo/control or comparing different CXL protocols in the PK population were included. The primary objective was assessment of outcomes of CXL versus placebo and comparison of different CXL protocols in terms of maximum keratometry (Kmax) or Kmax change from baseline (Δ), spherical equivalent, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central corneal thickness (CCT) in both at short term (6 months) and long term (1st, 2nd, and 3rd year or more). The secondary objective was comparative evaluation of safety. For the meta-analysis, the RevMan5.3 software was used. RESULTS: A total of 48 RCTs were included. Compared to control, CXL was associated with improvement in Δ Kmax at 1 year (4 RCTs, mean difference [MD], -1.78 [-2.71, -0.86], P = 0.0002) and 2 and 3 years (1 RCT); ΔBCVA at 1 year (7 RCTs, -0.10 [-0.14, -0.06], P < 0.00001); and Δ CCT at 1 year (2 RCTs) and 3 years (1 RCT). Compared to conventional CXL (C-CXL), deterioration in Δ Kmax, ΔBCVA and endothelial cell density was seen at long term in the transepithelial CXL (TE-CXL, chemical enhancer). Up to 2 years, there was no difference between TE-CXL using iontophoresis (T-ionto) and C-CXL. At 2 and 4 years, C-CXL performed better compared to accelerated CXL (A-CXL) in terms of improving Kmax. Although CCT was higher in the A-CXL arm at 2 years, there was no difference at 4 years. While exploring heterogeneity among studies, selection of control eye (fellow eye of the same patient vs. eye of different patient) and baseline difference in Kmax were important sources of heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: CXL outperforms placebo/control in terms of enhancing Kmax and CCT, as well as slowing disease progression over time (till 3 years). T-ionto protocol, on the other hand, performed similarly to C-CXL protocol up to 2 years.

12.
Bioinform Biol Insights ; 17: 11779322231171777, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37533429

ABSTRACT

NSP16 is one of the structural proteins of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) necessary for its entrance to the host cells. It exhibits 2'O-methyl-transferase (2'O-MTase) activity of NSP16 using methyl group from S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) by methylating the 5-end of virally encoded mRNAs and shields viral RNA, and also controls its replication as well as infection. In the present study, we used in silico approaches of drug repurposing to target and inhibit the SAM binding site in NSP16 using Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved small molecules set from Drug Bank database. Among the 2 456 FDA-approved molecules, framycetin, paromomycin, and amikacin were found to be significant binders against the SAM binding cryptic pocket of NSP16 with docking score of -13.708, -14.997 and -15.841 kcal/mol, respectively. Classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulation and molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA)-based binding free energy calculation depicted that all these three framycetin, paromomycin, and amikacin might be promising therapeutic leads towards SARS-CoV-2 infections via host immune escape inhibition pathway.

13.
Epilepsy Res ; 182: 106895, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35305446

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Focal seizures are associated with various co-morbidities. Seizure disorders also affect the quality of life of the patients. A huge proportion of patients continue to have uncontrolled seizures despite the availability of numerous antiepileptic drugs. Novel therapeutic targets too, have failed to overcome this problem. Therefore, drugs acting on conventional targets are being explored. Perampanel is one such drug. The present study aimed to assess its efficacy, safety, and effect on quality of life and cognition in patients aged 12 years and above. METHODS: Database search was conducted using keywords perampanel, partial seizures and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Single and double blinded RCTs were included in the analysis. The primary outcomes assessed were 50% responder rate and seizure freedom rates. Secondary outcomes assessed were Improvement in Clinical Global Improvement for Change (CGI-C), number of patients who experienced adverse events, number of patients who withdrew from trials, adverse drug reaction (ADR) profile from Vigibase, long term safety, quality of Life (QoL) assessment and cognitive assessment, especially in adolescents. The Risk ratios (RR) were calculated for these parameters. RESULTS: 24 full text articles were obtained out of a total 421 studies. From these seven double blind randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Perampanel treated patients showed higher 50% responder rates than those treated with placebo. The Risk Ratios (RRs) were 1.39 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.79], 1.83 [95% CI 1.51 - 2.22] and 1.81 [95% CI 1.45-2.27] for the 4 mg per day, 8 mg once daily and 12 mg once daily subgroups of perampanel respectively. The RRs for the seizure freedom rates were 4.52 [95% CI 1.30-15.73], 3.65 [95% CI 1.40-9.52] and 2.14 [95% CI 1.11-4.11] for 4 mg per day, 8 mg once daily and 12 mg once daily subgroups of perampanel respectively. There was a significantly higher risk of TEAEs with the 8 mg and 12 mg doses of perampanel as compared to that with placebo. Number of patients who withdrew from the trials due to adverse events was statistically significant in only the 12 mg subgroup of perampanel in comparison to that with placebo group. CONCLUSION: Perampanel was observed to be an effective add on drug for treating pharmacoresistant focal seizures. The patients achieved higher 50% response rates and freedom from seizures with its use. Tolerability of perampanel was more at lower doses.


Subject(s)
Epilepsies, Partial , Adolescent , Epilepsies, Partial/chemically induced , Epilepsies, Partial/drug therapy , Humans , Nitriles , Pyridones/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Seizures/chemically induced , Seizures/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome
14.
Indian J Pharmacol ; 54(2): 131-137, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35546465

ABSTRACT

The use of the Internet has increased exponentially for buying as well as selling of goods. Even the purchase of medications online is no exception. Owing to its benefits, there are certain risk factors in purchase of online medicines. Currently, the data on the use of Internet pharmacies are limited. Thus, the main objective of our study is to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) of Indian population toward E-pharmacy in India carried out in the Department of Pharmacology, PGIMER, Chandigarh. A KAP questionnaire was prepared which was distributed to the participants through Google Forms and a URL sent to them. This questionnaire was divided into four sections including demographics, occupation, income, and use of the Internet to measure the alertness toward the online purchase of medicines. A total of 322 responses were collected, out of which only 268 (83.2%) participants were aware of online pharmacy. The awareness was more in males and that too in urban population. Among the respondents, majority of the users prefer to buy medicines offline (81%, n = 217) which can be due to poor quality of medicines and lack of trustworthy websites. The utmost reason for buying the medicine online was deficiency of availability in the market and differences in the prices. The most preferred drugs respondents were willing to buy online were prescription drugs followed by cosmetics and dietary supplements. In conclusion, of our results, most of the people use the Internet to search for the medications online who prefer to consult the physicians before buying. Therefore, the future of online pharmacy can be improved if there will be some set guidelines, awareness, and knowledge among the users.


Subject(s)
Pharmaceutical Services, Online , Pharmacies , Pharmacy , Prescription Drugs , Female , Humans , India , Internet , Male
15.
J Biomol Struct Dyn ; 40(19): 8894-8904, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33998950

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is caused by newly discovered severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). One of the striking targets amongst all the proteins in coronavirus is the main protease (Mpro), as it plays vital biological roles in replication and maturation of the virus, and hence the potential target. The aim of this study is to repurpose the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved molecules via computer-aided drug designing against Mpro (PDB ID: 6Y2F) of SARS CoV-2 due to its high x-ray resolution of 1.95 Å as compared to other published Mprostructures. High Through Virtual Screening (HTVS) of 2456 FDA approved drugs using structure-based docking were analyzed. Molecular Dynamics simulations were performed to check the overall structural stability (RMSD), Cα fluctuations (RMSF) and protein-ligand interactions. Further, trajectory analysis was performed to assess the binding quality by exploiting the protein-residue motion cross correlation (DCCM) and binding free energy (MM/GBSA). Tenofovir, an antiretroviral for HIV-proteases and Terlipressin, a vasoconstrictor show stable RMSD, RMSF, better MM/GBSA with good cross correlation as compared to the Apo and O6K. Moreover, the results show concurrence with Nelfinavir, Lopinavir and Ritonavir which have shown significant inhibition in in vitro studies. Therefore, we conclude that Tenofovir and Terlipresssin might also show protease inhibition but are still open to clinical validation in case of SARS-CoV 2 treatment.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Molecular Dynamics Simulation , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , HIV Protease , Tenofovir , Peptide Hydrolases , Molecular Docking Simulation , Protease Inhibitors/pharmacology
16.
J Biomol Struct Dyn ; 40(24): 13912-13924, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34751101

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus 2019 is a transmissible disease and has caused havoc throughout the world. The present study identifies the novel potential antiviral inhibitors against the nucleocapsid C-terminal domain that aids in RNA-binding and replication. A total of 485,629 compounds were screened, and MD was performed. The trajectory analysis (DCCM & PCA), structural integrity, and degree of compaction depicted the protein-ligand complex stability (PDB-PISA and Rgyr). Results obtained from screening shortlists 13 compounds possessing high Docking score. Further, seven compounds had a permissible RMSD limit (3 Å), with robust RMSF. Post-MD analysis of the top two compounds (204 and 502), DCCM & PCA analysis show a positive atomic displacements correlation among residues of active sites-dimer (Chain A and Chain B) & residual clustering. The ΔGint of RNA-bound (-83.5 kcal/mol) and drug-bound N-CTD-204 (-40.8 kcal/mol) and 502(-39.7 kcal/mol) as compared to Apo (-35.95 kcal/mol) suggests stabilization of protein, with less RNA-binding possibility. The Rgyr values depict the loss of compactness on RNA-binding when compared to the drug-bound N-CTD complex. Further, overlapping the protein complexes (0 ns and 100 ns) display significant changes in RMSD of the protein (204-2.07 Å and 502-1.89 Å) as compared to the Apo (1.72 Å) and RNA-bound form (1.76 Å), suggesting strong interaction for compound 204 as compared to 502. ADMET profiling indicates that these compounds can be used for further experiments (in vitro and pre-clinical). Compound 204 could be a promising candidate for targeting the N-protein-RNA assembly and viral replication.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome , Humans , Computer Simulation , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Polymers , RNA , SARS-CoV-2 , Molecular Docking Simulation , Molecular Dynamics Simulation
17.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 74(Suppl 2): 3186-3192, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34692450

ABSTRACT

During this COVID-19 pandemic, except steroid, none of the therapeutic measures have showed any evidence of efficacy. Traditionally jala-neti using lukewarm salted water remains a yogic way of maintaining upper airway hygiene. Saline irrigation decreases the concentration of inflammatory mediators (e.g. histamine, leukotriene etc.) in nasal secretions, reduces the severity and frequency of sinusitis, reduce need of antibiotic therapy and restores competency of nasal mucosa. Jala-neti is an integral part of six cleansing techniques of yogic kriyas practised in India since thousands of years. Jala-neti can clean the upper airways, prevents colonization of infectious agents, removes foreign bodies, prevents stasis of mucous and subsequently enhances the drainage of paranasal sinuses and maintain health. Regular practice of Jala neti improves nasal symptoms and overall health status of patients with sinusitis. Jala-neti sample can even be used for COVID-19 diagnosis. Povidone iodine (PVP-I) has been utilized as a time tested antimicrobial agent with broad spectrum coverage against wide range of bacteria and viruses. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 action of PVP-I was seen at a concentration as low as 0.45%. PVP-I is generally well tolerated upto 5%, however nasal ciliotoxicity is reported at this concentration, however, this toxicity is not reported with lower concentrations(1.25% and 0.5%). So, theoretically, by using neti-kriya with povidone iodine (0.5-1%) as irrigation solution can combine and enhance the protection against COVID-19 and this can be an important armor in the fight against COVID-19. However, this hypothesis needs to be validated in real life clinical trial scenario before implementing.

18.
Indian J Pharmacol ; 54(6): 431-442, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36722555

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Binding of linoleic acid (LA) to the spike trimer stabilizes it in closed conformation hindering its binding to angiotensin-converting enzyme-2, thus decreasing infectivity. In the current study, we tend to repurpose Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs as binder to the LA binding pocket in wild and double mutant spike protein. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Approved drugs from DrugBank database (n = 2456) were prepared using Ligprep module of Schrodinger. Crystal structure of LA bound to spike trimer was retrieved (PDB: 6ZB4) and prepared using protein preparation wizard and grid was generated. A virtual screening was performed. With the help of molecular dynamics (MD) studies interaction profile of screened drugs were further evaluated. The selected hits were further evaluated for binding to the double mutant form of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Following virtual screening, a total of 26 molecules were shortlisted, which were further evaluated using 1ns MD simulation study. Four ligands showing better root mean square deviation (RMSD), RMSD to LA with interaction profile similar to LA were further evaluated using 100 ns MD simulation studies. A total of 2 hits were identified, which performed better than LA (selexipag and pralatrexate). Both these ligands were also found to bind to LA binding site of the double mutant form (E484Q and L452R); however, the binding affinity of pralatrexate was found to be better. CONCLUSION: We have identified 2 ligands (selexipag and pralatrexate) as possible stable binders to the LA binding site in spike trimer (wild and mutant form). Among them, pralatrexate has shown in vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2, validating our study results.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents , SARS-CoV-2 , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus , Binding Sites , Ligands , Linoleic Acid , Molecular Dynamics Simulation , SARS-CoV-2/drug effects , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/genetics , Antiviral Agents/chemistry , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology
19.
J Crit Care ; 67: 172-181, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34808527

ABSTRACT

Ferritin is a known inflammatory biomarker in COVID-19. However, many factors and co-morbidities can confound the level of serum ferritin. This current metaanalysis evaluates serum ferritin level in different severity levels in COVID-19. Studies evaluating serum ferritin level in different clinical contexts (COVID-19 vs. control, mild to moderate vs. severe to critical, non-survivor vs. survivor, organ involvement, ICU and mechanical ventilation requirement) were included (total 9 literature databases searched). Metaanalysis and metaregression was carried out using metaphor "R" package. Compared to control (COVID-19 negative), higher ferritin levels were found among the COVID-19 patients [SMD -0.889 (95% C.I. -1.201, -0.577), I2 = 85%]. Severe to critical COVID-19 patients showed higher ferritin levels compared to mild to moderate COVID-19 patients [SMD 0.882 (0.738, 1.026), I2 = 85%]. In meta-regression, high heterogeneity was observed could be attributed to difference in "mean age", and "percentage of population with concomitant co-morbidities". Non-survivors had higher serum ferritin level compared to survivors [SMD 0.992 (0.672, 1.172), I2 = 92.33%]. In meta-regression, high heterogeneity observed could be attributed to difference in "mean age" and "percentage of male sex". Patients requiring ICU [SMD 0.674 (0.515 to 0.833), I2 = 80%] and mechanical ventilation [SMD 0.430 (0.258, 0.602), I2 = 32%] had higher serum ferritin levels compared to those who didn't. To conclude, serum ferritin level may serve as an important biomarker which can aid in COVID-19 management. However, presence of other co-morbid conditions/confounders warrants cautious interpretation.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/blood , COVID-19 , Ferritins/blood , COVID-19/diagnosis , Humans , Regression Analysis
20.
Med Hypotheses ; 149: 110539, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33662863

ABSTRACT

Using folic acid (FA) as placebo complicates the interpretation of the findings of few RCTs evaluating safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis in COVID-19. FA is found to bind to furin-protease and spike: ACE2 interface of SARS-CoV-2. In clinical studies, FA level was lowest among severe patients compared to mild and moderate disease. A single controlled study reported the benefit of combination of folic acid with Pyridoxine & cyanocobalamin in terms of clinical and laboratory cure parameters. One hypothesis associates the differences in geographical variation of disease severity with prevalence of methyl tertahydrofolic acid reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism. Other possible domains, where FA is hypothesized to be beneficial are COVID-19 associated pulmonary hypertension and hyper-homocystinemia. So, scientific justification of using folic acid as placebo in COVID-19 trials seems scientifically not credible and this may be one of the major factors for failure of many agents. We need to be more careful in choosing our placebo especially when conducting a placebo controlled trial.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Folic Acid/therapeutic use , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Placebos , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2/metabolism , COVID-19/complications , Humans , Hyperhomocysteinemia/complications , Hyperhomocysteinemia/drug therapy , Hypertension, Pulmonary/complications , Hypertension, Pulmonary/drug therapy , Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2)/genetics , Models, Theoretical , Nitric Oxide Synthase Type III/metabolism , Protein Binding , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Research Design , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL