ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To identify the methods employed within the UK practice prior to diagnostic gastroscopy and compare with published guidelines for patients undergoing general anaesthesia. DESIGN: National Health Service (NHS) endoscopy units were invited to take part in a structured telephone survey to determine the length of time patients are kept nil-by-mouth (NBM) for food and fluids prior to gastroscopy, and whether a preprocedure mucolytic drink was used. METHODS: 212 NHS Trusts providing endoscopy services were identified from the Joint Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy. Trusts were excluded if they were children's hospitals (n=5). RESULTS: 207 NHS Trusts were telephoned. 193 completed the survey (93%), 11 Trusts declined and there was no response from 3 Trusts. 13 separate policies regarding NBM timings were identified. 51 Trusts (21%) used the timings ratified by Surgical and Anaesthetic Societies (6â h NBM for food, 2â h for clear fluid). 135 Trusts (70%) used a policy which starved patients in excess of the standard surgical guidelines. No Trust used a mucolytic drink prior to gastroscopy. CONCLUSIONS: The survey revealed large variation in NHS Trust's policies regarding the times patients were starved prior to gastroscopy. Results of surgical studies demonstrate increased risk of significant pulmonary aspiration with increased fluid-starvation periods, 68% of NHS endoscopy policy would be deemed excessive by surgical practice. There is no routine use of a mucolytic drink to improve mucosal visualisation in the UK practice.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In the UK, oesophagectomy is the current recommendation for patients with persistent high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus. Radiofrequency ablation is an alternative new technology with promising early trial results. AIM: To undertake a cost-utility analysis comparing these two strategies. METHODS: We constructed a Markov model to simulate the natural history of a cohort of patients with high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus undergoing one of two treatment options: (i) oesophagectomy or (ii) radiofrequency ablation followed by endoscopic surveillance with oesophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia recurrence or persistence. RESULTS: In the base case analysis, radiofrequency ablation dominated as it generated 0.4 extra quality of life years at a cost saving of £1902. For oesophagectomy to be the most cost-effective option, it required a radiofrequency ablation treatment failure rate (high-grade dysplasia persistence or progression to cancer) of >44%, or an annual risk of high-grade dysplasia recurrence or progression to cancer in the ablated oesophagus of >15% per annum. There was an 85% probability that radiofrequency ablation remained cost-effective at the NICE willingness to pay threshold range of £20 000-30 000. CONCLUSION: Radiofrequency ablation is likely to be a cost-effective option for high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus in the UK.