Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 44
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
AIDS Behav ; 27(5): 1716-1725, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36318431

ABSTRACT

Internet-recruited gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) were offered HIV self-tests (HIVSTs) after completing baseline, 3-, 6-, and 9-month follow-up surveys. The surveys asked about the use and distribution of these HIVSTs. Among 995 who reported on their distribution of HIVSTs, 667 (67.0%) distributed HIVSTs to their social network associates (SNAs), which resulted in 34 newly identified HIV infections among 2301 SNAs (1.5%). The main reasons participants reported not distributing HIVSTs included: wanting to use the HIVSTs themselves (74.9%); thinking that their SNAs would get angry or upset if offered HIVSTs (12.5%); or not knowing that they could give the HIVSTs away (11.3%). Self-testing programs can provide multiple HIVSTs and encourage the distribution of HIVST by MSM to their SNAs to increase awareness of HIV status among persons disproportionately affected by HIV.


RESUMEN: Hombres gais, bisexuales y otros hombres que indicaron tener contacto sexual con hombres (MSM, por sus siglas en inglés) fueron reclutados por el Internet y se les ofreció autopruebas del VIH (HIVST, por sus siglas en inglés) después de completar una encuestas inicial y encuestas de seguimiento a los 3, 6 y 9 meses. Las encuestas recogieron datos sobre el uso y distribución de estas autopruebas del VIH. De los 995 MSM que indicaron distribuir las autopruebas, 667 (67.0%) distribuyeron las autopruebas a personas en sus redes sociales (SNA, por sus siglas en inglés), resultando en 34 nuevas infecciones por el VIH identificadas entre 2,301 SNA (1.5%). Las razones principales por las que algunos participantes no distribuyeron las autopruebas del VIH incluyen: el deseo de utilizar las autopruebas del VIH para sí mismos (74.9%); pensar que las SNA se enfadarían o molestarían si se les ofreciesen autopruebas del VIH (12.5%); o no saber que podían distribuir las autopruebas del VIH (11.3%). Los programas que proporcionen múltiples autopruebas del VIH podrían alentar la distribución de las autopruebas por parte de los MSM a las SNA para aumentar el conocimento sobre el estado del VIH entre personas afectadas de manera desproporcionada por el VIH.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Male , Humans , Homosexuality, Male , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Sexual Behavior , Social Networking
2.
AIDS Behav ; 26(2): 623-630, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34406551

ABSTRACT

To assess whether pressuring others to use HIV self-tests is prevalent among US men who have sex with men (MSM), we analyzed data from a randomized controlled trial of HIV self-testing. Among 752 online-recruited MSM who received HIV self-tests and responded to a 12-month survey, 8.5% (60/709) reported pressuring someone to use an HIV self-test: 29 pressured a friend, 28 pressured a sexual partner, and 1 pressured a family member. Conversely, 2.1% (15/715) reported being pressured to self-test: 12 by a sexual partner and 3 by a friend. No physical harm was reported. HIV prevention programs that use HIV self-tests to reach populations at risk for HIV may be reassured by our findings because, despite reports of pressure to use HIV self-tests, no physical abuse was reported between sex partners. These programs should, however, include messages emphasizing the voluntary use of HIV self-tests and be prepared to address concerns of persons who have been pressured to use HIV self-tests. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02067039) and the date of registration is February 5, 2014.


RESUMEN: Analizamos los datos de un ensayo controlado aleatorio (ECA) de 12 meses para evaluar si presionar a alguien a que utilice la autoprueba del VIH es una ocurrencia frecuente entre hombres estadounidenses que tienen sexo con hombres (HSH) reclutados via el internet. Entre 752 HSH que recibieron por correo autopruebas del VIH y que respondieron a una encuesta a los 12 meses del ECA, el 8.5% (60/709) informó haber presionado a alguien a que usara una autoprueba del VIH: 29 presionaron a un amigo, 28 presionaron a una pareja sexual y uno presionó a un miembro de su familia. Por el contrario, el 2.1% (15/715) informó haber sido presionado a usar la autoprueba: 12 por una pareja sexual y 3 por un amigo. Ningun participante reporto daños físicos. Los programas de prevención del VIH que utilizan autopruebas del VIH para alcanzar a poblaciones a riesgo de contraer el VIH, pueden sentirse tranquilizados por nuestros hallazgos porque, a pesar de los reportes de presión para usar las autopruebas del VIH, no se reporto abuso físico entre parejas sexuales. Sin embargo, los programas deben incluir mensajes que enfaticen el uso voluntario de las autopruebas del VIH y estar preparados para calmar las preocupaciones de las personas que han sido presionadas a usar las autopruebas del VIH. El ensayo está registrado en www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02067039) y la fecha de registro es el 5 de febrero de 2014.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Sexual and Gender Minorities , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Homosexuality, Male , Humans , Male , Sexual Behavior , Sexual Partners , United States/epidemiology
3.
Arch Sex Behav ; 49(6): 1903-1914, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31845149

ABSTRACT

We sought to identify and compare correlates of condomless receptive anal intercourse with HIV-positive or unknown status partners (CRAI) for younger (< 25 years) and older (≥ 25 years) Hispanic/Latino, black/African-American, and white men who have sex with men (MSM). Baseline data from the Evaluation of Rapid HIV Self-Testing among MSM Project (eSTAMP), a randomized controlled trial with MSM (n = 2665, analytical sample size = 2421), were used. Potential correlates included participants' sociodemographic characteristics and HIV status as well as the characteristics of participants' partners. Younger Hispanic/Latino and black men were most likely to report having older sex partners (≥ 50% of partners being at least 5 years older), and having older partners was a significant correlate of CRAI among younger Hispanic/Latino and white men. Regardless of race/ethnicity, not knowing one's HIV status was a significant correlate of CRAI among younger men, whereas having a black sex partner was a significant correlate among older men. HIV prevention initiatives could address these and other correlates specific to race/ethnicity groups to target their prevention resources and messaging.


Subject(s)
Homosexuality, Male/ethnology , Sexual Behavior/ethnology , Adolescent , Adult , Black or African American , Age Factors , Ethnicity , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Internet , Male , United States , White People , Young Adult
4.
AIDS Behav ; 22(1): 117-126, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29058163

ABSTRACT

In the United States, an estimated 67% of new HIV diagnoses are among men who have sex with men (MSM), however 25% of HIV-positive MSM in the 2014 National HIV Behavioral Surveillance Survey were unaware of their infection. HIV self-testing (HIVST) with rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) may facilitate access to HIV testing. We evaluated the ability of 22 MSM to conduct two HIV RDTs (OraQuick ® In-Home HIV Test and a home-use prototype of Sure Check ® HIV 1/2 Assay), interpret sample images of test results, and collect a dried blood spot (DBS) specimen. While some participants did not follow every direction, most participants were able to conduct HIVST and correctly interpret their results. Interpretation of panels of RDT images was especially difficult when the "control" line was missing, and 27% of DBS cards produced were rated as of bad quality. Modifications to the DBS instructions were necessary prior to evaluating the performance of these tests in real-world settings.


Subject(s)
AIDS Serodiagnosis , HIV Infections/diagnosis , Homosexuality, Male , Mass Screening/methods , Self Care , Adult , Dried Blood Spot Testing , Georgia , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Male , Pilot Projects
5.
Sex Transm Dis ; 43(1): 61-4, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26650999

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients in sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic waiting rooms represent a potential audience for delivering health messages via video-based interventions. A controlled trial at 3 sites found that patients exposed to one intervention, Safe in the City, had a significantly lower incidence of STDs compared with patients in the control condition. An evaluation of the intervention's cost could help determine whether such interventions are programmatically viable. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cost of producing the Safe in the City intervention was estimated using study records, including logs, calendars, and contract invoices. Production costs were divided by the 1650 digital video kits initially fabricated to get an estimated cost per digital video. Clinic costs for showing the video in waiting rooms included staff time costs for equipment operation and hardware depreciation and were estimated for the 21-month study observation period retrospectively. RESULTS: The intervention cost an estimated $416,966 to develop, equaling $253 per digital video disk produced. Per-site costs to show the video intervention were estimated to be $2699 during the randomized trial. CONCLUSIONS: The cost of producing and implementing Safe in the City intervention suggests that similar interventions could potentially be produced and made available to end users at a price that would both cover production costs and be low enough that the end users could afford them.


Subject(s)
Health Education/economics , Health Promotion/economics , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Audiovisual Aids/economics , Community Health Centers , Costs and Cost Analysis , Focus Groups , Humans , Time Factors , Video Recording/economics
6.
BMC Pediatr ; 14: 280, 2014 Nov 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25380718

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: One of the most effective ways to promote the prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV-1 in resource-limited settings is to encourage HIV-positive mothers to practice exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) for the first 6 months post-partum while they receive antiretroviral therapy (ARV). Although EBF reduces mortality in this context, its practice has been low. We studied the rate of adherence to EBF and assessed associated maternal and infant characteristics using data from a phase II PMTCT clinical trial conducted in Western Kenya which included a counseling intervention to encourage EBF by all participants. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Kisumu Breastfeeding Study (KiBS), conducted between July 2003 and February 2009. This study enrolled a total of 522 HIV-1 infected pregnant women. Data on breastfeeding were available for 480 mother-infant pairs. Infant feeding and general nutrition counseling began at 35 weeks gestation and continued throughout the 6 month post-partum intervention period, following World Health Organization (WHO) infant feeding guidelines. Data on infant feeding were collected during routine clinic visits and home visits using food frequency questionnaires and dietary recall methods. Participants were instructed to exclusively breastfeed until initiation of weaning at 5.5 months post-partum. We used Kaplan-Meier methods to estimate the rates of EBF at 5.25 months post-partum, stratified by maternal and infant characteristics measured at enrollment, delivery, and 2 weeks post-partum. RESULTS: The estimated EBF rate at 5.25 months post-partum was 80.4%. Only 3% of women introduced other foods (most commonly water with or without glucose, cow's milk, formula, and fruit) by 2 months; this percentage increased to 5% of women by 4 months. Women who had ≥3 previous births (p < 0.01) and who were not living with the infant's father (p = 0.04) were more likely to exclusively breastfeed. Mixed feeding was more common for male infants than for female infants (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Exclusive breastfeeding was common in this clinical trial, which emphasized EBF as a best practice until infants reached 5.5 months of age. Counseling initiated prior to delivery and continued during the post-partum period provided a consistent message reinforcing the benefits of EBF. The findings from this study suggest high adherence to EBF in resource limited settings can be achieved by a comprehensive counseling intervention that encourages EBF.


Subject(s)
Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active , Breast Feeding , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV-1 , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Patient Compliance , Perinatal Care , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Adult , Counseling , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Kenya , Male , Maternal Age , Parity , Pregnancy , Socioeconomic Factors , Young Adult
7.
Matern Child Health J ; 18(3): 648-56, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23836013

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to estimate prenatal human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening rates prior to and on admission to labor and delivery (L&D) and to examine factors associated with HIV screening, including hospital policies, with a comparison of HIV and hepatitis B prenatal screening practices and hospital policies. In March 2006, a survey of hospitals (n = 190) and review of paired maternal and infant medical records (n = 4,762) were conducted in 50 US states, DC, and Puerto Rico. Data from the survey and medical record review were analyzed using SAS software v9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). HIV testing before delivery occurred among 3,438 women (73.9%); African American and Hispanic women were more likely to be tested than white women [aOR 2.22, 95% CI (1.6-3.1) and aOR 1.55, 95% CI (1.1-2.2), respectively]. Among women without previous HIV testing, 138 (16.6%) were tested after admission to labor and delivery. Policies to test women with undocumented HIV status in at delivery were present in 65 (36.3%) hospitals. HIV testing after admission to L&D was more likely in hospitals with policies to test women with undocumented HIV status [aOR 5.91, 95% CI (2.0-17.8)]. Overall, policies and screening practices for HIV were consistently less prevalent than those for hepatitis B. Many women are not being routinely screened for HIV before or at delivery. Women with unknown HIV status were more likely to be tested in L&D in hospitals with testing policies.


Subject(s)
HIV Seropositivity/diagnosis , Labor, Obstetric , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Prenatal Care , Female , Humans , Male , Medical Audit , Odds Ratio , Pregnancy , United States
8.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 166(1): 126-134, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38415793

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this serial cross-sectional analysis is to estimate the total number of prevented perinatal HIV transmissions from the time of the initial recommendation for perinatal zidovudine (ZDV) prophylaxis in 1994 through 2020 in the US. METHODS: The estimated number of prevented transmissions was calculated as annual differences between expected and observed numbers of perinatal HIV transmissions. Annual expected number of transmissions was estimated by multiplying the annual number of births to women with HIV by 0.2255 (22.55%), i.e., the transmission rate of the control group in the ACTG Protocol 076 trial. We used published point estimates or, if only ranges were given, the midpoints of those ranges as the best estimates of the annual numbers of births to women with HIV and infants with perinatal HIV. When data were not available, we linearly interpolated or extrapolated the available data to obtain estimated numbers for each year. RESULTS: Between 1978 and 2020, the approximate number of live births to women with HIV was 191 267 (95% confidence interval [CI] 190 392-192 110) and for infants with diagnosed perinatal HIV, it was 21 379 (95% CI 21 088-21 695). Since 1994, the annual number of infants born with HIV decreased from 1263 (95% CI 1194-1333) to 33 in 2019 (95% CI 22-45) and 36 in 2020 (95% CI 25-48), corresponding to a 97% reduction. Cumulatively, an estimated total of 22 732 (95% CI 21 340-24 462) perinatal HIV infections were prevented from 1994 through to 2020. CONCLUSION: The elimination of perinatal HIV transmission-accompanied by the cumulative number of prevented cases exceeding that of perinatal HIV infections-is a major public health achievement in the US.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents , HIV Infections , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Zidovudine , Humans , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/transmission , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Female , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , United States/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Zidovudine/therapeutic use , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use
9.
Public Health Rep ; 138(4): 664-670, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37178058

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To understand SARS-CoV-2 transmission in early care and education (ECE) settings, we implemented a Test to Stay (TTS) strategy, which allowed children and staff who were close contacts to COVID-19 to remain in person if they agreed to test twice after exposure. We describe SARS-CoV-2 transmission, testing preferences, and the number of in-person days saved among participating ECE facilities. METHODS: From March 21 through May 27, 2022, 32 ECE facilities in Illinois implemented TTS. Unvaccinated children and staff who were not up to date with COVID-19 vaccination could participate if exposed to COVID-19. Participants received 2 tests within 7 days after exposure and were given the option to test at home or at the ECE facility. RESULTS: During the study period, 331 TTS participants were exposed to index cases (defined as people attending the ECE facility with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result during the infectious period); 14 participants tested positive, resulting in a secondary attack rate of 4.2%. No tertiary cases (defined as a person with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result within 10 days after exposure to a secondary case) occurred in the ECE facilities. Most participants (366 of 383; 95.6%) chose to test at home. Remaining in-person after an exposure to COVID-19 saved approximately 1915 in-person days among children and staff and approximately 1870 parent workdays. CONCLUSION: SARS-CoV-2 transmission rates were low in ECE facilities during the study period. Serial testing after COVID-19 exposure among children and staff at ECE facilities is a valuable strategy to allow children to remain in person and parents to avoid missing workdays.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Child , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Vaccines , Illinois/epidemiology , Risk Factors
10.
Am J Public Health ; 102 Suppl 2: S201-4, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22401522

ABSTRACT

We used Centers for Disease Control and Prevention HIV Counseling and Testing System data from 2007 to determine the percentage and characteristics of persons newly identified as HIV-positive in US correctional facilities. The newly identified HIV positivity was 0.7%, and 30% of detainees newly identified with HIV were categorized as having low-risk heterosexual contact or no acknowledged risk. Correctional facilities should provide detainees with routine opt-out HIV testing, unless the prevalence of previously undiagnosed HIV infection has been documented to be less than 0.1%.


Subject(s)
AIDS Serodiagnosis/statistics & numerical data , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/statistics & numerical data , HIV Infections/diagnosis , Prisoners/statistics & numerical data , Prisons/organization & administration , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Female , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Prisons/statistics & numerical data , Public Health Practice/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22020069

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the risk of nevirapine (NVP)-associated hepatotoxicity among HIV-infected pregnant women with a CD4 count ≥250 cells/mm(3). METHODS: We enrolled HIV-infected pregnant Kenyan women who initiated triple antiretroviral therapy (ART) at 34 weeks gestation. We compared the rates of severe hepatotoxicity (grades 3-4 hepatotoxicity) and rash-associated hepatotoxicity (rash with ≥grade 2 hepatotoxicity) with NVP and nelfinavir (NFV), respectively. RESULTS: We initiated triple ART in 522 pregnant women; severe hepatotoxicity and rash-associated hepatotoxicity occurred in 14 (3%) and 9 (2%) women, respectively. Women who initiated NVP had higher rates of severe hepatotoxicity (5% vs 1%; P = .03) and rash-associated hepatotoxicity (4% vs 0%; P = .003) when compared with NFV. Among women who initiated NVP (n = 254), a baseline CD4 count ≥250 cells/mm(3) was not associated with severe hepatotoxicity (5% vs 3%; P = .52) or rash-associated hepatotoxicity (4% vs 3%; P = .69). CONCLUSION: Nevirapine use but not CD4 count ≥250 cells/mm(3) was associated with hepatotoxicity.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/adverse effects , Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury/etiology , Drug Eruptions/etiology , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Nevirapine/adverse effects , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Adult , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury/complications , Drug Eruptions/complications , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , HIV Infections/immunology , Humans , Kenya , Nelfinavir/adverse effects , Nevirapine/therapeutic use , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/immunology , Risk Factors , Young Adult
12.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr ; 91(1): 58-67, 2022 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35972854

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To determine whether Positive Health Check, a highly tailored video doctor intervention, can improve viral suppression and retention in care. SETTING: Four clinics that deliver HIV primary care. METHODS: A hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation randomized trial design was used to test study hypotheses. Participants (N = 799) who were not virally suppressed, were new to care, or had fallen out of care were randomly assigned to receive Positive Health Check or the standard of care alone. The primary endpoint was viral load suppression, and the secondary endpoint was retention in care, both assessed at 12 months, using an intention-to-treat approach. A priori subgroup analyses based on sex assigned at birth and race were examined as well. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between Positive Health Check (N = 397) and standard of care (N = 402) for either endpoint. However, statistically significant group differences were identified from a priori subgroup analyses. Male participants receiving Positive Health Check were more likely to achieve suppression at 12 months than male participants receiving standard of care adjusted risk ratio [aRR] [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 1.14 (1.00 to 1.29), P = 0.046}. For retention in care, there was a statistically significant lower risk for a 6-month visit gap in the Positive Health Check arm for the youngest participants, 18-29 years old [aRR (95% CI) = 0.55 (0.33 to 0.92), P = 0.024] and the oldest participants, 60-81 years old [aRR (95% CI) = 0.49 (0.30 to 0.81), P = 0.006]. CONCLUSIONS: Positive Health Check may help male participants with HIV achieve viral suppression, and younger and older patients consistently attend HIV care. REGISTRY NAME: Positive Health Check Evaluation Trial. Trial ID: 1U18PS004967-01. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03292913.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents , HIV Infections , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Serologic Tests , Viral Load , Young Adult
13.
PLoS Med ; 8(3): e1001015, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21468300

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Effective strategies are needed for the prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT) in resource-limited settings. The Kisumu Breastfeeding Study was a single-arm open label trial conducted between July 2003 and February 2009. The overall aim was to investigate whether a maternal triple-antiretroviral regimen that was designed to maximally suppress viral load in late pregnancy and the first 6 mo of lactation was a safe, well-tolerated, and effective PMTCT intervention. METHODS AND FINDINGS: HIV-infected pregnant women took zidovudine, lamivudine, and either nevirapine or nelfinavir from 34-36 weeks' gestation to 6 mo post partum. Infants received single-dose nevirapine at birth. Women were advised to breastfeed exclusively and wean rapidly just before 6 mo. Using Kaplan-Meier methods we estimated HIV-transmission and death rates from delivery to 24 mo. We compared HIV-transmission rates among subgroups defined by maternal risk factors, including baseline CD4 cell count and viral load. Among 487 live-born, singleton, or first-born infants, cumulative HIV-transmission rates at birth, 6 weeks, and 6, 12, and 24 mo were 2.5%, 4.2%, 5.0%, 5.7%, and 7.0%, respectively. The 24-mo HIV-transmission rates stratified by baseline maternal CD4 cell count <500 and ≥500 cells/mm(3) were 8.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.8%-12.0%) and 4.1% (1.8%-8.8%), respectively (p = 0.06); the corresponding rates stratified by baseline maternal viral load <10,000 and ≥10,000 copies/ml were 3.0% (1.1%-7.8%) and 8.7% (6.1%-12.3%), respectively (p = 0.01). None of the 12 maternal and 51 infant deaths (including two second-born infants) were attributed to antiretrovirals. The cumulative HIV-transmission or death rate at 24 mo was 15.7% (95% CI 12.7%-19.4%). CONCLUSIONS: This trial shows that a maternal triple-antiretroviral regimen from late pregnancy through 6 months of breastfeeding for PMTCT is safe and feasible in a resource-limited setting. These findings are consistent with those from other trials using maternal triple-antiretroviral regimens during breastfeeding in comparable settings.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Breast Feeding , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/transmission , HIV-1/physiology , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Anti-HIV Agents/adverse effects , Delivery, Obstetric , Demography , Female , HIV Infections/virology , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Kenya , Medication Adherence , Mothers , Pregnancy , Young Adult
14.
PLoS Med ; 7(2): e1000233, 2010 Feb 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20169113

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Intrapartum and neonatal single-dose nevirapine (NVP) reduces the risk of mother-to-child HIV transmission but also induces viral resistance to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) drugs. This drug resistance largely fades over time. We hypothesized that women with a prior single-dose NVP exposure would have no more than a 10% higher cumulative prevalence of failure of their NNRTI-containing antiretroviral therapy (ART) over the first 48 wk of therapy than would women without a prior exposure. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We enrolled 355 NVP-exposed and 523 NVP-unexposed women at two sites in Zambia, one site in Kenya, and two sites in Thailand into a prospective, non-inferiority cohort study and followed them for 48 wk on ART. Those who died, discontinued NNRTI-containing ART, or had a plasma viral load >or=400 copies/ml at either the 24 wk or 48 wk study visits and confirmed on repeat testing were characterized as having failed therapy. Overall, 114 of 355 NVP-exposed women (32.1%) and 132 of 523 NVP-unexposed women (25.2%) met criteria for treatment failure. The difference in failure rates between the exposure groups was 6.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8%-13.0%). The failure rates of women stratified by our predefined exposure interval categories were as follows: 47 of 116 women in whom less than 6 mo elapsed between exposure and starting ART failed therapy (40%; p<0.001 compared to unexposed women); 25 of 67 women in whom 7-12 mo elapsed between exposure and starting ART failed therapy (37%; p = 0.04 compared to unexposed women); and 42 of 172 women in whom more than 12 mo elapsed between exposure and starting ART failed therapy (24%; p = 0.82 compared to unexposed women). Locally weighted regression analysis also indicated a clear inverse relationship between virologic failure and the exposure interval. CONCLUSIONS: Prior exposure to single-dose NVP was associated with an increased risk of treatment failure; however, this risk seems largely confined to women with a more recent exposure. Women requiring ART within 12 mo of NVP exposure should not be prescribed an NNRTI-containing regimen as first-line therapy.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/drug therapy , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Nevirapine/therapeutic use , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Kenya , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Thailand , Treatment Outcome , Zambia
15.
JAMA Intern Med ; 180(1): 117-125, 2020 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31738378

ABSTRACT

Importance: Undiagnosed HIV infection results in delayed access to treatment and increased transmission. Self-tests for HIV may increase awareness of infection among men who have sex with men (MSM). Objective: To evaluate the effect of providing HIV self-tests on frequency of testing, diagnoses of HIV infection, and sexual risk behaviors. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 12-month longitudinal, 2-group randomized clinical trial recruited MSM through online banner advertisements from March through August 2015. Those recruited were at least 18 years of age, reported engaging in anal sex with men in the past year, never tested positive for HIV, and were US residents with mailing addresses. Participants completed quarterly online surveys. Telephone call notes and laboratory test results were included in the analysis, which was completed from August 2017 through December 2018. Interventions: All participants had access to online web-based HIV testing resources and telephone counseling on request. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the control group or a self-testing (ST) group, which received 4 HIV self-tests after completing the baseline survey with the option to replenish self-tests after completing quarterly surveys. At study completion, all participants were offered 2 self-tests and 1 dried blood spot collection kit. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were HIV testing frequency (tested ≥3 times during the trial) and number of newly identified HIV infections among participants in both groups and social network members who used the study HIV self-tests. Secondary outcomes included sex behaviors (eg, anal sex, serosorting). Results: Of 2665 participants, the mean (SD) age was 30 (9.6) years, 1540 (57.8%) were white, and 443 (16.6%) had never tested for HIV before enrollment. Retention rates at each time point were more than 54%, and 1991 (74.7%) participants initiated 1 or more follow-up surveys. More ST participants reported testing 3 or more times during the trial than control participants (777 of 1014 [76.6%] vs 215 of 977 [22.0%]; P < .01). The cumulative number of newly identified infections during the trial was twice as high in the ST participants as the control participants (25 of 1325 [1.9%] vs 11 of 1340 [0.8%]; P = .02), with the largest difference in HIV infections identified in the first 3 months (12 of 1325 [0.9%] vs 2 of 1340 [0.1%]; P < .01). The ST participants reported 34 newly identified infections among social network members who used the self-tests. Conclusions and Relevance: Distribution of HIV self-tests provides a worthwhile mechanism to increase awareness of HIV infection and prevent transmission among MSM. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02067039.


Subject(s)
AIDS Serodiagnosis/methods , HIV Infections/diagnosis , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Sexual Behavior , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Adolescent , Adult , Bisexuality , Dried Blood Spot Testing , HIV Serosorting , Homosexuality, Male , Humans , Internet , Male , Mass Screening , Young Adult
16.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 96: 106097, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32738408

ABSTRACT

For people with HIV, important transmission prevention strategies include early initiation and adherence to antiretroviral therapy and retention in clinical care with the goal of reducing viral loads as quickly as possible. Consequently, at this point in the HIV epidemic, innovative and effective strategies are urgently needed to engage and retain people in health care to support medication adherence. To address this gap, the Positive Health Check Evaluation Trial uses a type 1 hybrid randomized trial design to test whether the use of a highly tailored video doctor intervention will reduce HIV viral load and retain people with HIV in health care. Eligible and consenting patients from four HIV primary care clinical sites are randomly assigned to receive either the Positive Health Check intervention in addition to the standard of care or the standard of care only. The primary aim is to determine the effectiveness of the intervention. A second aim is to understand the implementation potential of the intervention in clinic workflows, and a third aim is to assess the costs of intervention implementation. The trial findings will have important real-world applicability for understanding how digital interventions that take the form of video doctors can be used to decrease viral load and to support retention in care among diverse patients attending HIV primary care clinics.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents , HIV Infections , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Medication Adherence , Primary Health Care , Viral Load
17.
Public Health Rep ; 124(2): 288-94, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19320371

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: A mediator is a psychosocial construct that is targeted by an intervention to bring about behavior change. Recent literature suggests that a widely used approach for assessing mediation, namely the causal steps method, can be severely statistically underpowered. This article describes three standard methods for assessing mediation: causal steps, difference in coefficients, and product of coefficients. We also demonstrate the use of asymmetric confidence limits (ACLs) in testing mediation. METHODS: We compared the results obtained by ACL construction with results obtained based on the causal steps and product of coefficients approaches to analyze data from the Seropositive Urban Men's Intervention Trial. RESULTS: ACL construction uncovered previously unidentified mediating factors. We also identified a marginally significant suppressor, which means that, with regard to this factor, the intervention had effects that were opposite from the desired direction. CONCLUSIONS: ACLs are preferred for this type of analysis because of their statistical power and because they are informative regardless of whether the intervention has a significant effect on the outcome. Furthermore, ACLs present the size of the mediating effect rather than just a binary decision regarding significance.


Subject(s)
Behavior Therapy/methods , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/psychology , Models, Psychological , Negotiating/psychology , Risk Reduction Behavior , Risk-Taking , Causality , Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic , HIV Seropositivity/psychology , Homosexuality, Male/psychology , Humans , Male , Negotiating/methods , Psychological Theory , Uncertainty , Unsafe Sex
18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19270152

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The authors evaluated hematologic changes associated with zidovudine (ZDV) following single-drug substitution from stavudine (D4T) in HIV-infected persons in Uganda. METHODS: From May 2003 through February 2007, the authors evaluated incidence rates (IR) of hematologic abnormalities from quarterly blood draws among adults prescribed highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) before and after single-drug substitution of D4T to ZDV. RESULTS: A total of 1089 adults received D4T-containing HAART (median observation time, 35.9 months), and 290 (27%) had ZDV substituted for D4T. While taking D4T, IR for anemia was 0.35/100 person-months (PMs), leukopenia was 0.29/100 PM, and thrombocytopenia was 0.32/100 PM. While taking ZDV, IR for anemia was 0.44/100 PM, leukopenia was 1.05/100 PM, and thrombocytopenia was 0.30/100 PM. CONCLUSIONS: Patients had a higher incidence of anemia and leukopenia after substitution from D4T to ZDV, but hematologic toxicity was not a major complication in this population. Patients on ZDV-containing HAART regimens are still at risk for anemia and need close monitoring.


Subject(s)
Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Hematologic Diseases/chemically induced , Rural Population , Stavudine/administration & dosage , Zidovudine/adverse effects , Adult , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , HIV Infections/virology , Hematologic Diseases/epidemiology , Hematologic Tests , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Uganda , Zidovudine/administration & dosage
19.
PLoS Med ; 5(6): e135, 2008 Jun 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18578564

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sexually transmitted disease (STD) prevention remains a public health priority. Simple, practical interventions to reduce STD incidence that can be easily and inexpensively administered in high-volume clinical settings are needed. We evaluated whether a brief video, which contained STD prevention messages targeted to all patients in the waiting room, reduced acquisition of new infections after that clinic visit. METHODS AND FINDINGS: In a controlled trial among patients attending three publicly funded STD clinics (one in each of three US cities) from December 2003 to August 2005, all patients (n = 38,635) were systematically assigned to either a theory-based 23-min video depicting couples overcoming barriers to safer sexual behaviors, or the standard waiting room environment. Condition assignment alternated every 4 wk and was determined by which condition (intervention or control) was in place in the clinic waiting room during the patient's first visit within the study period. An intent-to-treat analysis was used to compare STD incidence between intervention and control patients. The primary endpoint was time to diagnosis of incident laboratory-confirmed infections (gonorrhea, chlamydia, trichomoniasis, syphilis, and HIV), as identified through review of medical records and county STD surveillance registries. During 14.8 mo (average) of follow-up, 2,042 patients (5.3%) were diagnosed with incident STD (4.9%, intervention condition; 5.7%, control condition). In survival analysis, patients assigned to the intervention condition had significantly fewer STDs compared with the control condition (hazard ratio [HR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Showing a brief video in STD clinic waiting rooms reduced new infections nearly 10% overall in three clinics. This simple, low-intensity intervention may be appropriate for adoption by clinics that serve similar patient populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT00137670).


Subject(s)
Audiovisual Aids , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Video Recording , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algorithms , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/diagnosis , Time Factors
20.
AIDS ; 32(12): 1625-1632, 2018 07 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30001243

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: For HIV-infected pregnant and breastfeeding women, antiretroviral therapy (ART) is known to reduce the mother's risk of passing the infection to her child. However, concerns remain about possible associations between various components of different ART regimens and adverse fetal and infant outcomes. As part of a clinical trial in western Kenya for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV, pregnant women received one of two different ART regimens. METHODS: The original PMTCT study conducted in Kenya enrolled 522 HIV-infected, ART-naive pregnant women. These women were assigned to receive an ART regimen that included either nevirapine, a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), or nelfinavir, a protease inhibitor. This substudy involves 384 women from the original study who had baseline CD4 cell counts at least 250 cells/µl, and compares the risks of adverse fetal and infant outcomes between the two ART regimens. RESULTS: There were 386 live births (including multiples) and 7 (1.8%) stillbirths. Among live births, there were 67 preterm deliveries, 37 low-birth weight infants, and 14 infant deaths by 6 months. There were no statistically significant differences between the two ART regimens for any of the reported adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: Although these data do not show significant differences between the NNRTI-based or protease inhibitor-based regimens in serious adverse fetal and infant outcomes, more studies need to be done and careful vigilance is needed to ensure infant safety.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/adverse effects , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active/adverse effects , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active/methods , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Kenya , Male , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Treatment Failure , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL