Pediatric organ transplantation and risk of premalignant and malignant tumors in Sweden.

Increased cancer risks are well documented in adult organ transplant recipients. However, the spectrum of malignancies and risk in the pediatric organ transplant population are less well described. We identified all solid organ transplanted patients aged <18 in Sweden between 1970-2007 (n = 536) in the National Patient Register and linked to the Cancer Register. Nationwide rates were used to calculate standardized incidence rate ratios and 95% CI estimating the association between transplant and cancer during maximum 36 years of follow-up. Nearly 7% of pediatric solid organ transplant recipients developed a premalignant or malignant tumor during follow-up. Transplantation was associated with an increased risk of any cancer (n = 24, SIR = 12.5, 95% CI: 8.0-18.6): non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (n = 13, SIR = 127, 95% CI: 68-217), renal cell (n = 3, SIR = 105, 95% CI: 22-307), vulva/vagina (n = 3, SIR = 665, 95% CI: 137-1934) and nonmelanoma skin cancers (n = 2, SIR = 64.7, 95% CI: 7.8-233.8). NHL typically appeared during childhood, while other tumors were diagnosed during adulthood. Apart from short-term attention toward the potential occurrence of NHL, our results suggest cancer surveillance into adulthood with special attention to skin, kidneys and the female genitalia.

Pancreas-specific protein. New serum marker for graft rejection in pancreas-transplant recipients.

A radioimmunoassay for a novel human pancreatic protein (pancreas-specific protein, PASP) has been developed. We studied the possibility that serum PASP levels reflect pancreas-graft rejections in human pancreas-transplant recipients. Ten patients subjected to combined pancreas-kidney transplantation and 4 patients subjected to pancreas transplantation alone were studied. Twelve kidney recipients served as control subjects. On several occasions, PASP levels were elevated at kidney rejections in patients with combined pancreas-kidney grafts and then decreased after antirejection therapy, although no other indications for concomitant pancreas-graft rejection were at hand. In the recipients of pancreas grafts alone, PASP levels increased before or at the same time as graft rejections were indicated by current methods. In two cases of chronic graft rejection, PASP rose to high levels long before hyperglycemia occurred. In the control group of kidney-graft recipients, PASP levels were stable and were not affected by high serum creatinine levels, kidney-rejection episodes, or antirejection therapy. This study indicates that PASP may be a good serum marker for pancreas-graft rejection.

Effects of pancreas transplantation on metabolic and hormonal profiles in IDDM patients.

The diurnal patterns of relevant metabolites and hormones in five pancreas-kidney-transplanted patients (aged 36 +/- 2 yr, mean +/- SD) with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) were compared with those in five kidney-transplanted nondiabetic patients (aged 28 +/- 2 yr). The groups were matched for body mass and current dose and type of immunosuppressive treatment. The serum creatinine levels did not differ between the two study groups, but the serum urea level in the nondiabetic patients was slightly but significantly higher than in the diabetic patients. In the pancreas-kidney-transplanted group the investigation was performed 8-47 mo posttransplantation; in the kidney-transplanted nondiabetic patients, 12-18 mo posttransplantation. The mean 24-h levels and rhythms of blood glucose, free fatty acid, 3-hydroxybutyrate, and alanine did not differ between the groups. The mean 24-h levels of blood lactate and glycerol were moderately but significantly higher in the pancreas-kidney-transplanted diabetic patients. At fasting, the level of serum immunoreactive insulin was more than twice as high in the pancreas-kidney-transplanted patients, whereas the plasma C-peptide levels did not differ significantly between the two groups. The meal-induced increases in serum insulin as well as in the plasma C-peptide levels were more marked in the pancreas-kidney-transplanted patients. The findings suggest that the hyperinsulinemia in these patients was due to both the systemic delivery of insulin and an increase in insulin resistance, the latter being particularly apparent in the postprandial phase.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Markers for pancreas-graft rejection in humans.

Rejection episodes were studied in 15 patients, in whom no kidney graft could serve as a marker for rejection, subjected to pancreas transplantation with pancreatoenterostomy and temporary exteriorization of the pancreatic juice (10 pancreas alone, 3 pancreas after kidney, and 2 combined pancreas and kidney in which the kidney was not functioning.) Twelve patients (80%) had a total of 18 rejection episodes. In the first 11 patients, 13 rejection episodes were diagnosed by a decline in amylase activity in the pancreatic juice, whereas in the next 4 patients, 5 rejection episodes were diagnosed by positive cytology in the pancreatic juice. Neopterin in pancreatic juice and immunoreactive anionic trypsin in serum showed promise as rejection markers, whereas serum neopterin, serum amylase, and serum immunoreactive cationic trypsin did not. Unspecific signs of rejections were an increase in white blood cell count, clinical symptoms such as fever, abdominal pain, and arthralgia. All acute rejection episodes were successfully reversed by antirejection treatment. However, late rejections diagnosed by impaired endocrine function were seen in 6 of the 15 (40%) patients, and the prognoses for these rejections were worse: 4 patients (27%) lost their grafts because of chronic rejections, and 2 patients still had impaired endocrine function.

Pregnancy after combined pancreas-kidney transplantation.

Four successful cases of pregnancy after combined pancreas-kidney transplantation at four different centers are summarized. The techniques used for the pancreas transplantations were duct obstruction in one patient and enteric exocrine diversion in two patients; in all three patients the insulin delivery was to the systemic circulation. In one patient exocrine diversion was to the stomach and the vascular anastomosis to the splenic vessels, thus accomplishing portal insulin delivery. Immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporin and prednisolone in two patients; cyclosporin alone in one patient; and cyclosporin, azathioprine, and prednisolone in one patient. In all a cesarean section was performed, due to deteriorating renal function in two patients, a fall in fetal growth in one patient, and fear of inducing pancreas-graft pancreatitis during normal delivery in one patient. In all four women, perfect metabolic control was retained throughout the pregnancy, and despite the proximity of the pancreas graft to the growing uterus in three of the women, the pancreas grafts did not suffer any damage during the pregnancy. However, in one patient the pancreas graft was lost in acute rejection after delivery. This pancreas had functioned normally for 3 yr before this occasion. Of the offspring, one was completely normal, one had a bilateral cataract, and two were small for date. The latter two subsequently showed normal growth development. At follow-up at 3, 5, 7, and 28 mo, all kidney grafts and three of the pancreas grafts remained functional. We conclude that after combined pancreas-kidney transplantation, successful conception and pregnancy can be obtained. Despite reduced islet mass (segmental grafts), normal metabolic control can be retained throughout the pregnancy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Long-term metabolic control in recipients of segmental-pancreas grafts with pancreaticoenterostomy or duct obstruction.

Metabolic control in recipients of segmental-pancreas grafts with pancreaticoenterostomy (performed in Stockholm) or duct obstruction by polymer injection (performed in Oslo) were compared. The recipients were uremic diabetic patients and also received a kidney from the same donor. Because the patient population in the two Scandinavian countries is very similar and the immunosuppressive protocols used are almost identical, such a comparison seemed reasonable. The number of patients available for study at 1, 2, and 3 yr was 22, 10, and 4, respectively, with duct injection and 28, 10, and 3 with pancreaticoenterostomy. The mean age of the patients was somewhat higher in the Oslo series. There were no significant differences regarding immunosuppression or kidney-graft function as estimated by serum creatinine at 1, 2, and 3 yr. No significant differences were found in fasting blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, and intravenous glucose tolerance between the two groups at 1, 2, and 3 yr.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between single oral doses of diltiazem and sirolimus in healthy volunteers.

AIM AND BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetic interaction between sirolimus, a macrolide immunosuppressant metabolized by CYP3A4, and the calcium channel blocker diltiazem was studied in 18 healthy subjects. Several clinically important interactions have previously been reported for other immunosuppressive drugs that are metabolized by the same enzyme and for calcium antagonists. METHODS: Healthy subjects who were 20 to 43 years old participated in an open, three-period, randomized, crossover study of the pharmacokinetics of a single 10-mg oral dose of sirolimus, a single oral 120-mg dose of diltiazem, and the two drugs given together. The three study periods were separated by a 21-day washout phase. RESULTS: The geometric mean (90% confidence interval) whole blood sirolimus area under the plasma concentration time-curve increased 60% (35%-90%), from 736 to 1178 ng x h/mL, and maximum concentration increased 43% (14%-81%), from 67 to 96 ng/mL, with diltiazem coadministration, whereas the mean elimination half-life of sirolimus decreased slightly, from 79 to 67 hours. Apparent oral clearance and volume of distribution of sirolimus decreased with 38% and 45%, respectively, when sirolimus was given with diltiazem. The plasma maximum concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve of diltiazem, desacetyldiltiazem, and desmethyldiltiazem were unchanged after coadministration of sirolimus, and no potentiation of the effects of diltiazem on diastolic or systolic blood pressure or on the electrocardiographic parameters was seen. CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose diltiazem coadministration leads to higher sirolimus exposure, presumably by inhibition of the first-pass metabolism of sirolimus. Because of the pronounced intersubject variability in the extent of the sirolimus-diltiazem interaction, whole blood sirolimus concentrations should be monitored closely in patients treated with the two drugs.

Improved survival in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and end-stage diabetic nephropathy 10 years after combined pancreas and kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of pancreatic transplantation in insulin-dependent diabetic patients is to restore normoglycemia and thereby prevent the secondary complications of diabetes. However, uncertainty remains as to whether the mortality rate in diabetic patients can be affected by this procedure. METHOD: We followed 14 patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and end-stage diabetic nephropathy for 10 years after successful combined kidney and pancreas transplantation. Fifteen diabetic patients subjected to kidney transplantation alone have served as controls. The glycemic control has been studied annually for 10 years and diabetic polyneuropathy has been assessed in both groups after 2, 4, and 8 years. RESULTS: In recipients of pancreas-kidney grafts, metabolic control was maintained throughout the observation period, with values of glycated hemoglobin in the normal range. In contrast, glucose metabolism was impaired in the control group, with glycated hemoglobin values around 10%. Nerve conduction and parasympathetic autonomic dysfunction improved in both groups after 2 years; there was no difference between the groups. After 4 years, we found a significant difference between the study group and the control group, and after 8 years it had widened. At the 4-year evaluation, there was no difference in mortality between the groups. At 8 years, however, a significant difference was noted, which was further substantiated at 10 years with a 20% mortality rate in the pancreas-kidney group versus an 80% mortality in the kidney alone group. CONCLUSIONS: We found a substantial reduction in mortality in IDDM patients 10 years after successful combined pancreas and kidney transplantation. We speculate that the decrease in mortality was due to the beneficial effect of long-term normoglycemia on diabetic late complications and suggest therefore that combined pancreas and kidney transplantation, rather than kidney transplantation alone, should be offered to IDDM patients with end-stage diabetic nephropathy.

Sirolimus allows early cyclosporine withdrawal in renal transplantation resulting in improved renal function and lower blood pressure.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated whether cyclosporine (CsA) could be eliminated from a sirolimus (Rapamune, rapamycin, SRL)-CsA-steroid (ST) regimen at 3 months. METHODS: This was an open-label study conducted in Europe, Australia, and Canada. Upon enrollment, 525 primary (90%) or secondary (10%) renal allograft recipients with cadaveric (89%) or living (11%) donors received 2 mg of sirolimus (troughs>5 ng/ml), CsA, and steroids. At 3 months+/-2 weeks, eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to remain on SRL-CsA-ST or to have CsA withdrawn and therapy continued with SRL (troughs 20-30 ng/ml)-ST. RESULTS: At 12 months, overall graft and patient survival were 89.1% and 94.9%, respectively. In the 430 (82%) randomized patients, there was no difference in graft survival (95.8% vs. 97.2%, SRL-CsA-ST vs. SRL-ST) or patient survival (97.2% vs. 98.1%, respectively). The incidence of biopsy-confirmed primary acute rejection was 13.1% during the prerandomization period. After randomization, the acute rejection rates were 4.2% and 9.8% for SRL-CsA-ST and SRL-ST, respectively (P=0.035). Renal function (calculated glomerular filtration rate, 57 vs. 63 ml/min, P<0.001) and blood pressure significantly improved when CsA was withdrawn. Hypertension, CsA nephrotoxicity, hyperuricemia, and Herpes zoster occurred statistically more frequently in patients remaining on CsA, whereas thrombocytopenia, abnormal liver function tests, and hypokalemia were reported more often for SRL-ST therapy. CONCLUSION: Sirolimus, CsA, and steroids for 3 months posttransplant, followed by elimination of CsA, is a safe and effective alternative to continuous therapy with sirolimus, CsA, and steroids that can result in better renal function and lower blood pressure.

Hyperlipidemia in renal transplant recipients treated with sirolimus (rapamycin).

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus is an interesting immunosuppressive drug that does not seem to cause nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, or diabetogenicity, as commonly seen in patients treated with cyclosporine or tacrolimus. In this report, we describe a possible association between sirolimus and observed hyperlipidemia. METHODS: Serum levels of triglycerides and cholesterol were analyzed in 11 patients who participated in a pilot study evaluating the effect of oral sirolimus or placebo combined with cyclosporine and corticosteroids on the occurrence of acute renal transplant rejection. RESULTS: In four of nine patients given sirolimus, significantly increased serum triglyceride levels were seen, with peak levels occurring 2-4 months after transplantation and ranging between 11.7 and 42.0 mmol/L (reference value <2.2 mmol/L). In two patients given placebo, the serum triglyceride levels remained below 5.0 mmol/L. After reduction or discontinuation of sirolimus, the serum triglyceride levels decreased within 1-2 months and after 1-8 months levels had returned to their pretransplant values. A significant increase in serum cholesterol levels was seen in one of nine patients given sirolimus. CONCLUSION: It seems that long-term treatment with sirolimus in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids may increase the risk of hypertriglyceridemia.

Improved results in pancreatic transplantation by avoidance of nonimmunological graft failures.

Twenty eight consecutive combined renal and pancreatic transplantations with enteric exocrine diversion were performed between June 1984 and May 1986. The one-year actuarial patient survival and renal and pancreatic graft survival were 90%, 67%, and 69%, respectively. Nineteen pancreatic grafts and eighteen renal grafts are currently functioning at 1-24 months. Of the pancreatic graft losses only 2 were attributable to nonimmunological complications. No pancreatic graft was lost due to pancreaticoenteric leakage or vascular thrombosis. This was achieved by reducing the cold ischemia time and by adopting an aggressive anticoagulant policy. In all patients with functioning grafts the fasting blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin level, and oral glucose tolerance test were normal. The intravenous glucose tolerance test was normal in most of the patients but subnormal in some.

Multicenter trial exploring calcineurin inhibitors avoidance in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The adoption of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) as the mainstay of immunosuppression has resuited in a significant decrease of acute rejection and improvement of short-term graft survival. However, because of the irreversible nephrotoxicity associated with the chronic use of the CNI, the magnitude of the improvement of long-term graft survival has been more modest. Therefore, an effective immunosuppression regimen that does not rely on CNI may result in improvement of long-term outcome and simplification of the management of transplant recipients. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients of primary cadaver or living donor kidneys at low immunologic risk were enrolled in a CNI avoidance study. The immunosuppression regimen consisted of daclizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the alpha chain of the interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2Ralpha), administered for a total of five doses at biweekly intervals; 3 gm/day mycophenolate mofetil for the first 6 month and 2 gm thereafter; and conventional corticosteroid therapy. Patients who underwent rejection episodes could be started on CNI. The primary efficacy end-point was biopsy-proven rejection during the first 6 months posttransplant. RESULTS: Biopsy-proven rejection was diagnosed in 48% of patients during the first 6 months after transplantation. The majority of rejection episodes were Banff grade I and IIA and were fully reversed with corticosteroid therapy. The median time to the first biopsy-proven rejection among patients who experienced this event during the first 6 months was 39 days. In 22 patients with delayed graft function, the proportion of patients with biopsy-proven rejection was 50% at 6 months. However in the first 2 weeks posttransplant, only 1 of 22 patients with delayed graft function developed biopsy-proven rejection. At 1 year, patient survival was 97% and graft survival was 96%. Only two grafts were lost secondary to rejection. At 1-year posttransplant, 62% of patients had received CNI for more than 7 days. At 1-year posttransplant, the mean serum creatinine in the nonrejectors with no CNI use was 113 micromol/L (95%, confidence interval [CI], 100.7 to 125.3 micromol/L) and in the rejectors or patients with CNI use (more than 7 days) was 154 micromol/L (95% CI, 135.0 to 173.0 micromol/L). In selected patients with rejection, analysis of circulating and intragraft lymphocytes revealed complete IL-2Ralpha saturation. CONCLUSIONS: This CNI avoidance study in immunologic low-risk patients, while only partially successful in preventing acute rejection, provided benefits to a sizable minority of patients who have not required chronic CNI therapy. However, wide acceptance of a CNI-sparing immunosuppression regimen may require a lower rate of acute rejection, possibly through the addition of a non-nephrotoxic dose of CNI. However, because complete IL-2Ralpha blockade was present during rejection, it can be assumed that alternative pathways, such as IL-15, may be responsible for the rejection; thus, the incorporation of non-nephrotoxic immunosuppressive agents, such as sirolimus, may provide a more strategic approach.

Sirolimus (rapamycin)-based therapy in human renal transplantation: similar efficacy and different toxicity compared with cyclosporine. Sirolimus European Renal Transplant Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus (rapamycin) is a potent immunosuppressant with a mechanism of action different from cyclosporine (CsA) or tacrolimus. METHODS: In 11 European centers, first cadaveric renal allograft recipients were randomized to CsA (n=42) or sirolimus (n=41). Dosing of these agents was concentration-controlled and open-labeled. All patients received corticosteroids and azathioprine. RESULTS: At 12 months, graft survival (98% sirolimus vs. 90% CsA), patient survival (100% vs. 98%), and incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (41% vs. 38%) were similar. Serum creatinine was lower with sirolimus, significantly (P< or =0.05) so at 3 and 4 months, and serum uric acid and magnesium were normal. Laboratory abnormalities reported significantly more often with sirolimus included hypertriglyceridemia (51% vs. 12%), hypercholesterolemia (44% vs. 14%), thrombocytopenia (37% vs. 0%), leukopenia (39% vs. 14%), and, of lesser importance, increased liver enzymes and hypokalemia. These abnormalities improved 2 months after transplantation when the sirolimus target trough level was lowered from 30 to 15 ng/ml. Occurrence of cytomegalovirus was comparable (14% vs. 12%); incidences of herpes simplex (24% vs. 10%, P=0.08) and pneumonia (17% vs. 2%, P=0.03) were higher with sirolimus. No gingival hyperplasia was seen with sirolimus, tremor was rare, and hypertension was less frequent (17% vs. 33%). Two malignancies were observed with CsA and none with sirolimus. CONCLUSIONS: Results at 12 months suggest that sirolimus can be used as base therapy in the prophylaxis of acute renal transplant rejection, and has a safety profile that differs from CsA.

Sirolimus in association with mycophenolate mofetil induction for the prevention of acute graft rejection in renal allograft recipients.

INTRODUCTION: A previous trial in renal transplantation comparing sirolimus (rapamycin) to cyclosporine (CsA) in a triple-drug therapy regimen with azathioprine and corticosteroids found that the incidence of acute rejection was similar (approximately 40%) with a trend for better renal function with sirolimus. METHODS: In 14 European centers, first cadaveric renal allograft recipients were randomized to receive sirolimus (n = 40) or CsA (n = 38) in an open-label design. All patients received corticosteroids and mycophenolate mofetil 2 g/day. Sirolimus and CsA were concentration controlled; trough levels of mycophenolic acid and prednisolone were also measured. RESULTS: At 12 months, graft survival (92.5% sirolimus vs. 89.5% CsA), patient survival (97.5% sirolimus vs. 94.7% CsA), and the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (27.5% sirolimus vs. 18.4% CsA) were not statistically different. The use of antibodies to treat suspected rejection episodes was also similar (7.5% sirolimus vs. 5.3% CsA). More sirolimus patients received bolus steroid therapy (20 vs. 11, P = 0.068). From month 2 onward, the calculated glomerular filtration rate was consistently higher in sirolimus-treated patients. The adverse events reported more frequently with sirolimus were thrombocytopenia (45% vs. 8%) and diarrhea (38% vs. 11%). In the CsA group, increased creatinine (18% vs. 39%), hyperuricemia (3% vs. 18%), cytomegalovirus infection (5% vs. 21%), and tremor (5% vs. 21%) were observed significantly more often. DISCUSSION: Patient and graft survival and the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 12 months were comparable between sirolimus and CsA, whereas safety profiles were different. These data suggest that sirolimus may be used as primary therapy for the prevention of acute rejection.

Penetration of clindamycin, cefoxitin, and piperacillin into pancreatic juice in man.

In our segmental pancreatic transplantation technique the pancreatic juice is temporarily diverted to the exterior via a pancreatic duct catheter. This permits studies on pure pancreatic juice to be carried out. In 11 such patients we studied the penetration of clindamycin, cefoxitin, and piperacillin into pancreatic juice. These three antibiotics all have good effect against the bacteria commonly isolated during pancreatic infections. Simultaneous blood and pancreatic juice samples were collected immediately before drug administration and at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes and 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours after administration. The concentration of clindamycin in pancreatic juice was 34% of that in serum and exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentration for most bacteria associated with pancreatic infections. In spite of adequate serum concentrations of cefoxitin and piperacillin, the concentrations in pancreatic juice were only 8% and 5%, respectively, and did not exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration for the relevant bacteria. In view of these findings, clindamycin seems to be preferable in the treatment of pancreatic infections.

Pancreatic elastase 1 after pancreatic transplantation.

Human pancreatic elastase 1 (E1) is a novel pancreas-specific proteinase that has not yet been investigated after pancreatic transplantation (PTx). Using a recently developed E1 ELISA, we studied the E1 serum curves in 36 type I diabetic patients subjected to PTx with enteric exocrine diversion from the pretransplant value up to 8 years after transplantation (n = 731 samples). A characteristical pattern was observed: following PTx, E1 rose above the normal range to a peak within 6 days and then gradually fell to stabilize after 4-6 weeks at an elevated level (10 ng/ml) for approximately 1 year. Two to 8 years after PTx, E1 levels were still slightly elevated (1-6 ng/ml) in 14/20 patients. During 24 acute rejection episodes, E1 was found not be a sensitive rejection marker during the early postoperative period because of its slow decline from the peak level. However, increasing E1 levels in seven patients more than 2 months after PTx were associated with a variety of lesions to the pancreatic graft, thus suggesting a useful marker indicating exocrine graft damage late after PTx. The slightly elevated levels even years after PTx are most probably due to the non-portal venous drainage of the pancreatic graft.

Sirolimus experience at a Swedish transplantation center.

Sirolimus is an interesting drug due to its original mechanism of action and because it seems to lack the nephrotoxicity associated with calcineurin inhibitors. During the past 10 years, sirolimus has undergone several clinical trials. Beginning with phase I studies, our first patient given sirolimus was enrolled in 1993, after which we participated in sirolimus phase II trials and finally conducted the large phase III study that led to registration of sirolimus in the European Union (EU) in 2001. Altogether, 111 patients have been treated with sirolimus in our department. Initially, we participated in clinical trials evaluating sirolimus in combination with cyclosporine, but later we focused on studies using sirolimus as base therapy. We found sirolimus to be an effective immunosuppressant lacking several of the disturbing side effects associated with calcineurin inhibitors. It has a high antirejection efficacy and yields excellent survival results, with better renal function than that achieved by calcineurin inhibitors. The main side effects, hyperlipidemia and leukothrombocytopenia, are usually easily manageable. Sirolimus presents an alternative to prophylactic immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors and, in the field of transplantation, it represents a welcome addition to the immunosuppressive armamentarium.

Bicêtre hospital experience with sirolimus-based therapy in human renal transplantation: the Sirolimus European Renal Transplant Study.

In 11 European centers, first cadaveric renal allograft recipients were randomized to CsA (n = 42) or sirolimus (n = 41). Dosing of these agents was concentration-controlled and open-labeled. All patients received corticosteroids and azathioprine. At 12 months, graft survival (98% sirolimus vs 93% CsA), patient survival (100% vs 98%), and incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (41% vs 38%) were similar. Serum creatinine was lower with sirolimus, significantly (P

Segmental pancreatic transplantation in Stockholm.

Fifty-nine pancreatic transplantations have been performed at Huddinge Hospital between May 1974 and October 1985 with a substantial improvement in results over the years. In the most recent series, consisting of 19 combined renal and pancreatic transplantations performed May 1984 to September 1985; the 1-year actuarial patient survival and pancreatic graft survival were 86% and 66% respectively. Thirteen of these grafts are functional presently, at 18 to 2 months, and all such patients are insulin free and exhibit normal metabolic control. Our practice includes drainage of the pancreatic juice to the exterior by means of a pancreatic duct catheter during the first 2-3 postoperative weeks, thereby promoting healing of the pancreatico-enteric anastomosis. Although cold ischemia time was kept low in this series, a moderate graft pancreatitis developed, with a peak serum amylase level of 16.8 + 2.2 ukat/l and a peak amylase activity in the peripancreatic fluid of 280 + 110 ukat/l. The volume of pancreatic juice from the ductal catheter was very low in the first postoperative days but then rose to reach a plateau level of about 500 ml/day. The amylase activity in this juice was very high (9100 + 2500 ukat/l) during the first postoperative day, but then gradually decreased to reach a steady level around 3000 ukat/l after 4-7 days.