ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The Tack Endovascular System is a minimal-metal dissection repair device that is purpose-built to treat post-percutaneous angioplasty (PTA) arterial dissections in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty (TOBA) III trial evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the Tack Endovascular System in patients with superficial femoral artery (SFA) and/or proximal popliteal artery (PPA) dissection after PTA with a drug-coated balloon (DCB). The objective of this study is to report the results in the standard- (SL) and long-lesion (LL) cohorts through 24 months. DESIGN: The TOBA III study was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study including patients suffering from Rutherford category 2-4 PAD. Outcomes were assessed according to pre-specified lesion length in SL ( ≥ 20 mm and ≤150 mm) and LL ( > 150 mm and ≤250 mm) cohorts. Follow-up was through 24 months. RESULTS: TOBA III enrolled 201 patients, 169 patients in the SL cohort and 32 in the LL cohort. At 24 months, the Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from major adverse events were 91.7% and 82.6% for the SL cohort and LL cohort, respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from clinically driven-target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) were 92.3% in the SL cohort and 82.6% in the LL cohort. At 24 months, 78.8% of SL patients and 69.2% of LL patients experienced an improvement of >2 Rutherford categories (both cohorts p < 0.001). The baseline ankle-brachial index improved from 0.68 ± 0.18 to 0.93 ± 0.16 in the SL (p < 0.001) and from 0.62 ± 0.23 to 0.87 ± 0.15 in the LL cohort (p < 0.001) at 24 months. CONCLUSION: The 24-month results of the TOBA III trial support the safety and effectiveness of the Tack Endovascular System in patients who required post-PTA dissection repair in the SFA and PPA following DCB angioplasty for claudication and rest pain. In both the SL and LL cohorts, Tack placement was associated with sustained freedom from CD-TLR through 24 months as well as sustained improvements in Rutherford categories, ankle-brachial index, and quality of life.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of tibiopedal and distal femoral access for retrograde crossing of chronic total occlusion (CTO) in Rutherford stage III to VI peripheral arterial occlusive disease, and to determine factors that correlate with technical success. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-one consecutive patients were included in this retrospective study. Rutherford stages were III, IV, and V/VI in 24%, 8%, and 67% of patients. Inclusion criteria were CTO at the superficial femoral (SFA), popliteal (PA), and/or below-the-knee (BTK) level, and a failed antegrade treatment followed by a distal retrograde approach. The numbers of occluded vascular levels (OVL), lesion length, degree of calcification, technical success rate, complications, and clinical outcome were noted. RESULTS: OVL were 1 in 72%, 2 in 20%, and 3 in 8% of patients. CTOs were longer than 20 cm in 45.6% of cases and showed severe calcifications in 50.3%. Target vessels for distal access were the distal SFA/PA in 17% and BTK in 83%. The overall technical success rate was 82%. Severe calcification decreased technical success (p = 0.01) despite lesion length and Rutherford stage. Clinical outcome improved in 123/152 patients with a significant increase of the median ABI (N = 158) from 0.53 (interquartile range 0.39 to 0.61) to 0.85 (0.59 to 1.03; p < 0.001). Complications were reported in 7.6% cases with 2.3% related to the distal vascular access. CONCLUSION: The tibiopedal and distal femoral retrograde access presents a safe and effective treatment option of CTOs at the thigh and/or BTK after a failed antegrade attempt improving clinical outcome. Technical success decreased with lesion's degree of calcification. KEY POINTS: ⢠Safety and effectiveness of the tibiopedal and distal femoral access for retrograde crossing of chronic total occlusion. ⢠Target lesion's degree of calcification decreases technical success. ⢠Complications related to the distal vascular access were rare.
Subject(s)
Femoral Artery , Peripheral Arterial Disease , Chronic Disease , Cohort Studies , Femoral Artery/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the 36-month technical and clinical outcome after implantation of the 25-cm Viabahn endoprosthesis with Propaten bioactive surface in TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II C and D lesions of the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, single-arm trial (ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier NCT01263665) enrolled 71 patients (mean age 66.7±8.3 years; 50 men) with lifestyle-limiting claudication or rest pain (Rutherford category 2-4) and long (>20-cm) lesions of the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal arteries. Primary endpoint was primary patency at 36 months. Secondary endpoints included primary assisted patency; secondary patency; freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR); freedom from a composite of death, target vessel revascularization (TVR), and amputation; clinical success; and freedom from device fracture. RESULTS: Primary patency estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis was 40.6% at 36 months. Primary assisted patency and secondary patency estimates were 53.0% and 96.9%, respectively. Within 36 months, 27 patients had to undergo a TLR. Twenty-five patients (35.2%) had a TVR. Freedom from the composite of death, TVR, and amputation endpoint was 44.5%. The estimate of the sustained clinical success with stable or improved Rutherford category was 58.5%. No stent fracture was detected during follow-up. CONCLUSION: The primary patency rate without reintervention after treatment of long femoropopliteal lesions is low. However, secondary patency after implantation of a Viabahn endoprosthesis is high and seems to be superior to the use of other revascularization techniques, resulting in persistent clinical improvement.
Subject(s)
Heparin , Peripheral Arterial Disease , Aged , Femoral Artery/diagnostic imaging , Heparin/adverse effects , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnostic imaging , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Popliteal Artery/diagnostic imaging , Popliteal Artery/surgery , Prospective Studies , Stents , Treatment Outcome , Vascular PatencyABSTRACT
AIMS: Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for femoropopliteal interventions have not been tested against each other. We aimed to directly compare efficacy and safety of a high-dose (In.Pact™) vs. low-dose (Ranger™) DCB with nominal paclitaxel densities of 3.5 vs. 2.0 µg/mm2. METHODS AND RESULTS: Within a prospective, multicentre, non-inferiority, clinical trial 414 patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal lesions (Rutherford classification 2-4) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to endovascular treatment with either high- or low-dose DCB after stratification for lesion length. Primary efficacy and safety endpoints comprised primary patency and freedom from major adverse events (i.e. device and procedure-related deaths through 1 month, major amputations, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization through 12 months). We set a non-inferiority margin of -10% at 12 months. Total occlusions were observed frequently (>40%) and provisional stenting was performed in every fourth intervention. Non-inferiority was determined for both primary efficacy and safety endpoints at 12 months. Primary patency was 81.5% in the high-dose and 83.0% in low-dose DCB group {difference: 1.5% [lower bound of the 90% two-sided confidence interval (CI) -5.2%]; Pnon-inferiority < 0.01}. Freedom from major adverse events was determined in 92.6% in high-dose and in 91.0% in low-dose DCB group [difference -1.6% (lower bound of the 90% two-sided CI -6.5%); Pnon-inferiority < 0.01]. Overall death rate was low (2.0%) and no major amputation occurred. CONCLUSION: Two DCBs with different coating characteristics exhibited comparable results with excellent effectiveness and safety through 12 months for femoropopliteal interventions including a wide range of lesion lengths. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02701543).
Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon , Cardiovascular Agents , Peripheral Arterial Disease , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Coated Materials, Biocompatible , Femoral Artery , Humans , Paclitaxel , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Popliteal Artery , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular PatencyABSTRACT
Background Paclitaxel drug-coated balloon (DCB) catheter angioplasty is the preferred treatment for revascularization of femoropopliteal lesions in peripheral artery disease, but mortality is a safety concern. Purpose To assess 2-year efficacy and safety of DCB angioplasty compared with conventional balloon angioplasty (also known as plain old balloon angioplasty or POBA). Materials and Methods This prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial enrolled consecutive participants with symptomatic superficial femoral and/or popliteal artery disease at 11 German centers between September 2015 and December 2016. Participants underwent DCB angioplasty or conventional balloon angioplasty. Primary outcome of 6-month late lumen loss showed superiority of DCB angioplasty over conventional balloon angioplasty. Evaluation at 2 years included secondary outcomes of primary patency and target lesion revascularization (TLR) estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis, clinical and hemodynamic improvement, quality of life, target limb amputation, and all-cause mortality. Results A total of 171 participants (mean age, 69 years ± 8; 111 men) were evaluated. At 2 years, primary patency was achieved in 90.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 80.4%, 95.2%) of DCB angioplasty and 62.7% (95% CI: 50.0%, 73.0%) of conventional balloon angioplasty participants (P < .001). Freedom from TLR occurred in 97.2% (95% CI: 89.1%, 99.3%) of DCB angioplasty and 78% (95% CI: 66.5%, 86.0%) of conventional balloon angioplasty participants (P = .001). The groups did not differ in sustained improvement from baseline to 2 years in Rutherford-Becker category (row mean scores difference, 1.7; P = .19) and showed no difference in mean improvement in the Walking Impairment Questionnaire score (-0.8%; 95% CI: -11.8%, 10.2%; P = .88), EuroQol Group's five-dimension index of quality of life (-0.06; 95% CI: -0.17, 0.03; P = .20), or ankle-brachial index (0.03; 95% CI: -0.08, 0.14; P = .57). No major amputation was necessary. One DCB angioplasty and two conventional balloon angioplasty participants died (risk ratio, 0.48; 95% CI: 0.04, 5.10). Conclusion At 2 years after paclitaxel drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty, primary patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization remained superior compared with conventional balloon angioplasty. DCB angioplasty resulted in sustained clinical and hemodynamic improvement with no increased risk of mortality. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material in available for this article.
Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon/methods , Lower Extremity/blood supply , Lower Extremity/diagnostic imaging , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnostic imaging , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Aged , Coated Materials, Biocompatible , Female , Femoral Artery , Germany , Humans , Male , Popliteal Artery , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Single-Blind Method , Vascular PatencyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The Tack Endovascular System (Intact Vascular, Wayne, Pa) combines low-metallic content with focal delivery to seal areas of dissection associated with balloon angioplasty. The device system is designed to treat vascular dissections in the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal arteries. Tack implants exert low radial force and are associated with minimal metal burden, which reduces the mechanical stress on the arterial wall in treating dissections after balloon angioplasty. This study investigated the safety and effectiveness of the Tack Endovascular System in patients with dissections after drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty. METHODS: The Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty III (TOBA III) study is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study in which patients who underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with the Medtronic IN.PACT Admiral DCB (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) and experienced dissection after angioplasty were treated with Tack implants. The primary end points were freedom from major adverse events at 30 days and primary patency at 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were enrolled in the trial, 169 with standard-length lesions (≥20 mm and ≤150 mm) and 32 with long-length lesions (>150 mm and ≤250 mm). Safety and effectiveness results were favorable compared with historical benchmarks at 12 months in the standard-lesion cohort. Notably, patients in the standard-lesion cohort experienced 95.0% primary patency, 97.5% freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization, 100% freedom from amputation, and 100% survival at 12 months (P < .0001). Primary patency in long-lesion patients was 89.3%, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization was 96.8%, and freedom from amputation was 100% at 12 months. Device success was achieved in 95.8% (182/190) and 97.7% (43/44) of devices deployed into standard-lesion and long-lesion patients, respectively. Procedural success was 99.4% (168/169) and 100% (44/44) in the standard-lesion and long-lesion cohorts, respectively, with only one bailout stent placed in the entire population. CONCLUSIONS: The Tack Endovascular System is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with dissections after angioplasty in the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal arteries, with high patency, low rates of secondary intervention, and low incidence of bailout stenting when it is used in combination with DCB.
Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon/instrumentation , Aortic Dissection/surgery , Peripheral Arterial Disease/surgery , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Stents/adverse effects , Adult , Aortic Dissection/etiology , Angioplasty, Balloon/adverse effects , Angioplasty, Balloon/statistics & numerical data , Coated Materials, Biocompatible/adverse effects , Female , Femoral Artery/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Popliteal Artery/surgery , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prospective Studies , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome , Vascular PatencyABSTRACT
Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the novel SELUTION sustained-limus-release (SLR) drug-eluting balloon (DEB) in the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions. Materials and Methods: Between October 2016 and May 2017, 50 subjects (mean age 69.6±10.4 years; 29 men) with symptomatic moderate to severe lower limb ischemia (Rutherford categories 2 or 3) were enrolled at 4 German centers for the SELUTION SLR first-in-human trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02941224). The SELUTION SLR utilizes micro-reservoirs (biodegradable polymer spheres containing sirolimus) embedded within an amphipathic membrane coated onto an angioplasty balloon. The biodegradable reservoirs are transferred to the target vessel lumen during brief balloon inflation. The primary trial objective was comparison of angiographic late lumen loss at 6 months against an objective performance criterion (OPC) value of 1.04 mm for uncoated balloon angioplasty. Secondary endpoints included device, procedural, and clinical success; clinical and imaging assessments of primary patency and restenosis; functional assessments including Rutherford category and ankle-brachial index (ABI); and major adverse events [composite of cardiovascular mortality, index limb amputation, target limb thrombosis, and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR)]. Results: At 6 months, median angiographic late lumen loss following SELUTION SLR treatment was 0.19 mm (range -1.16 to 3.07). Mean angiographic late lumen loss (n=34) was 0.29±0.84 mm (95% CI -0.01 to 0.58), significantly lower than the 1.04-mm OPC value (p<0.001). The rate of primary patency by duplex ultrasound was 88.4%, and freedom from angiographic binary restenosis was 91.2%. Through 6 months, there was significant improvement over baseline in Rutherford categories (p<0.001) and in ABI measurements (p<0.001). A single case (2%) of CD-TLR occurred at 5 months. There were no other major adverse events. Conclusion: Through 6 months, the SELUTION SLR DEB appears to inhibit restenosis effectively and safely, improving outcomes in subjects with symptomatic femoropopliteal disease.
Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon/instrumentation , Cardiovascular Agents/administration & dosage , Coated Materials, Biocompatible , Femoral Artery , Ischemia/therapy , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Popliteal Artery , Sirolimus/administration & dosage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angioplasty, Balloon/adverse effects , Cardiovascular Agents/adverse effects , Constriction, Pathologic , Delayed-Action Preparations , Female , Femoral Artery/diagnostic imaging , Femoral Artery/physiopathology , Germany , Humans , Ischemia/diagnostic imaging , Ischemia/physiopathology , Limb Salvage , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnostic imaging , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Popliteal Artery/diagnostic imaging , Popliteal Artery/physiopathology , Prospective Studies , Recovery of Function , Severity of Illness Index , Sirolimus/adverse effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular PatencyABSTRACT
Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and sustainability of drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (ISR). Materials and Methods: An investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter, 1:1 randomized study enrolled 88 patients for treatment of ISR with DCB (n=47; mean age 68.3±9.6 years; 26 men) or uncoated balloon (n=41; mean age 67.6±10.2 years; 26 men) angioplasty (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01594684). Additionally, the protocol provided for an observational arm composed of patients from either randomized arm who experienced recurrent ISR ≥30 days after the index treatment. Redo treatment consisted of 2 DCBs sequentially inflated at the same location (double dose therapy). The majority of patients (66, 78%) had Rutherford category 3 ischemia. The mean lesion length was 140 mm; a third (27, 31%) were total occlusions. The primary endpoint was angiographic late lumen loss (LLL) at 6 months evaluated by an independent core laboratory. Results: Twenty-two patients (7 DCB +15 uncoated) were treated for recurrence with fully overlapping double DCB angioplasty. Six-month LLL was lower after DCB (0.34±1.12 mm) treatment than after angioplasty with an uncoated balloon (1.58±1.10 mm, p<0.001). At the 12-month follow-up, target lesion revascularization (TLR) was performed in 18 (49%) of 37 patients in the uncoated group, 6 (14%) of 43 patients in the single-dose DCB group (p=0.001), and no patients from the recurrent ISR group. At ~2 years after treatment, a remarkable number (14/27, 52%) of TLRs were recorded in the single-dose DCB group. Conclusion: Treatment with DCBs resulted in significantly less 6-month LLL and fewer TLRs up to 24 months than treatment with uncoated balloons. The double dose for treating recurrent ISR did not cause recognizable adverse events or require TLR up to 24 months.
Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon/instrumentation , Cardiovascular Agents/administration & dosage , Coated Materials, Biocompatible , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Femoral Artery , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Popliteal Artery , Stents , Vascular Access Devices , Aged , Angioplasty, Balloon/adverse effects , Cardiovascular Agents/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Female , Femoral Artery/diagnostic imaging , Femoral Artery/physiopathology , Germany , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Paclitaxel/adverse effects , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnostic imaging , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Popliteal Artery/diagnostic imaging , Popliteal Artery/physiopathology , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Retreatment , Switzerland , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular PatencyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate muscle perfusion in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) before and after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of the limb by means of MR arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion measurements during reactive hyperemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with symptomatic PAOD affecting the iliac or femoral vessels were investigated before and after PTA. A pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (PCASL) MR technique was applied. Perfusion was measured in soleus and tibialis anterior muscle during reactive hyperemia. Key parameters such as mean perfusion value (Phyp ), time-to-peak (TTP) and duration of hyperemia (Thyp ) describing the perfusion signal curve were examined. RESULTS: Between baseline and post-PTA, Phyp increased in both muscle groups. At the same time, TTP and Thyp decreased in both muscle groups. At the same time the clinically assessed ankle brachial index (ABI) increased from 0.56 ± 0.10 to 0.83 ± 0.15. The impaired pain-free walking distance improved in all patients. CONCLUSION: PCASL MRI can detect changes of the key perfusion parameters Phyp , TTP, and Thyp after successful PTA of the calf muscles during reactive hyperemia and seems to be a promising tool for monitoring of interventional treatments.
Subject(s)
Angioplasty/methods , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/physiopathology , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/surgery , Magnetic Resonance Angiography/methods , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Peripheral Arterial Disease/surgery , Aged , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/diagnosis , Blood Flow Velocity , Female , Femoral Artery/physiopathology , Femoral Artery/surgery , Humans , Iliac Artery/physiopathology , Iliac Artery/surgery , Leg/blood supply , Leg/physiopathology , Leg/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Spin Labels , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Purpose: To confirm the performance and safety of the 25-cm Viabahn endoprosthesis with Propaten bioactive surface when used in the treatment of de novo and/or restenotic TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II C and D lesions of the superficial femoral artery and proximal popliteal artery. Methods: The 25-cm Gore Viabahn Endoprosthesis study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01263665) is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study that enrolled 71 patients (50 men; mean age 66.7 ± 8.34 years) with lifestyle-limiting claudication (Rutherford class 2 to 4) and lesions longer than 20 cm (mean length 26.5 ± 5.31 cm, range 20-40). The majority of lesions (92.9%) were total occlusions. The primary performance outcome was post-deployment stent length within ± 10% of the pre-deployment stent length determined angiographically by quantitative vascular analysis. The primary safety outcome was device- and procedure-related serious adverse events occurring within 30 days of the procedure. The patients underwent follow-up examinations at 1 month and 1 year. Results : The median follow-up was 12.3 months (mean 12.3 ± 0.6). Nine (12.7%) patients discontinued the study due to different reasons including 2 bypass surgeries. Angiography was available in 60 patients to determine the primary performance outcome, which was met in all cases. Two (2.8%) patients experienced a procedure-/device-related adverse event (dissection) during the 30-day follow-up. Kaplan-Meier estimates for 1-year primary and secondary patency were 67.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 53.5% to 77.3%] and 96.9% (95% CI 88.0% to 99.2%), respectively. Changes in ankle-brachial index and Rutherford category at 1 and 12 months each showed sustained improvement. Conclusion : This study confirms that the 25-cm Viabahn endoprosthesis acutely performs as intended and is safe when used as indicated in complex femoropopliteal lesions. One-year primary and secondary patency rates are satisfying and comparable to historical prosthetic bypass graft outcomes.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Coated Materials, Biocompatible , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Femoral Artery/surgery , Heparin/administration & dosage , Peripheral Arterial Disease/surgery , Popliteal Artery/surgery , Stents , Aged , Ankle Brachial Index , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Constriction, Pathologic , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Europe , Female , Femoral Artery/physiopathology , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Popliteal Artery/physiopathology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Design , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular PatencyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To provide evidence for the safety and efficacy of the Proteus embolic capture balloon in lower limb interventions and to evaluate its indications for use. METHODS: The study was designed as a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, single arm study enrolling 123 patients (78 men; mean age 68 years). The primary endpoint was rate of freedom from death, amputation, and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 30 days post procedure. Follow-up was performed at 30 days and at 12 months. RESULTS: The freedom from death, amputation, and TVR rate was 95.9% (118/123). Procedure and device success rates were 98.7% (218/223) and 97.8% (156/158), respectively. TVR and death rates at 12 months were 18.8% and 4.1%, respectively. Histological analysis identified particles in 100% of the balloons. The median number of particles per subject was 339 (range 63-4361). Medians of particle size and total particle area were 0.8 (range 0.3-8.3) and 1.0 mm(2) (range 0.1-237) per balloon, respectively. Particles >1 mm were found in 37% (53/143) of the balloons analyzed. Higher mean number, length, and surface area of particles were found in long lesions (909±1057, 2.6±2.3 mm, and 18.2±44.2 mm(2), respectively; all p<0.0001 vs. short lesions). Additionally, longer particles were found in total occlusions (2.5±2.5 mm, p<0.0001), and a higher mean particle count was found in thrombotic lesions (1785±1821, p<0.05). De novo lesions had more thrombotic material than any other type of lesion. CONCLUSION: Proteus demonstrated good particle capture ability, making it a useful tool in situations where embolism is anticipated, such as complex lesions with calcified or thrombotic material and/or lesions with high plaque burden (i.e., long and totally occluded).
Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon/methods , Embolism/surgery , Lower Extremity/blood supply , Aged , Angioplasty, Balloon/instrumentation , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of using paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) on outcome after post-angioplasty dissection in femoropopliteal arteries. METHODS: The angiograms obtained in the THUNDER study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00156624) were analyzed to compare degrees of dissection and angiographic parameters between the control (uncoated balloons, n=43) and treatment (PCBs, n=43) groups before and after the intervention and at 6-month follow-up. Furthermore, target lesion revascularizations (TLR) were documented up to 2 years. RESULTS: In each group, 24 (56%) patients had a dissection after the intervention. At the 6-month follow-up, patients with dissection of any grade after treatment with PCBs had significantly less late lumen loss (0.4 mm) than patients with dissection after treatment with uncoated balloons (1.9 mm, p=0.001) and a lower degree of stenosis (20% vs. 51%, respectively; p=0.003). Patients with severe dissection (grades C, D, or E) especially seemed to benefit from the PCBs, with late lumen loss of 0.4 mm vs. 2.4 mm for controls (p=0.05). The binary restenosis rate was also markedly lower in the PCB group (20%) than in the uncoated group (55%, p=0.02). In the 2-year follow-up, TLR was performed in 56% of patients in the control group compared to 10% of patients in the PCB group (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: The results of this subgroup analysis suggest that patients with dissection following treatment with a paclitaxel-coated balloon have a very acceptable outcome and stent implantation is not necessary as long as the dissection does not result in acute flow limitation.
Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon/adverse effects , Angioplasty, Balloon/instrumentation , Aortic Dissection/etiology , Cardiovascular Agents/administration & dosage , Coated Materials, Biocompatible , Femoral Artery , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Popliteal Artery , Vascular Access Devices , Aged , Aortic Dissection/diagnosis , Aortic Dissection/physiopathology , Aortic Dissection/therapy , Constriction, Pathologic , Double-Blind Method , Equipment Design , Female , Femoral Artery/diagnostic imaging , Femoral Artery/physiopathology , Germany , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis , Popliteal Artery/diagnostic imaging , Popliteal Artery/physiopathology , Prospective Studies , Radiography , Recurrence , Regional Blood Flow , Retreatment , Risk Factors , Stents , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To present the 12-month results of a trial investigating the effects of dual antiplatelet therapy on target lesion revascularization (TLR) after balloon angioplasty ± stenting in the femoropopliteal segment. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, single-center, double-blinded and placebo-controlled clinical trial randomly assigned 40 patients to receive pre- and postinterventional therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel. Another 40 patients received the same doses of aspirin and placebo instead of clopidogrel. Clopidogrel and placebo were stopped after 6 months, and patients remained on aspirin only. At 12 months after the intervention, 36 clopidogrel patients and 37 placebo patients were reevaluated. RESULTS: At 6 months, clopidogrel patients had significantly lower rates of TLR compared to placebo patients [2 (5%) vs. 8 (20%), p=0.04]. After stopping clopidogrel/placebo after 6 months, there was no significant difference in TLR at 12 months after treatment [9 (25%) clopidogrel vs. 12 (32.4%) placebo, p=0.35]. Mortality was 0 vs. 1 in the placebo group at 6 months (p=0.32) and 0 vs. 3 at 12 months (p=0.08). CONCLUSION: In contrast to the first report of a reduction in the TLR at 6 months, this advantage of dual antiplatelet therapy does not persist after stopping clopidogrel. Prolonged dual therapy (>6 months) should be considered in patients who are at high risk for restenosis.
Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Ticlopidine/analogs & derivatives , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angioplasty, Balloon/adverse effects , Angioplasty, Balloon/instrumentation , Aspirin/adverse effects , Clopidogrel , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Stents , Ticlopidine/adverse effects , Ticlopidine/therapeutic use , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To determine the clinical and technical outcomes following endovascular therapy for aortoiliac occlusive disease, including complex reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation. METHODS: A retrospective database search identified 1184 consecutive patients (864 men; mean age 64±10 years) who underwent 1712 procedures to treat target lesions in the distal aorta and iliac arteries from September 1996 to December 2006. The intended strategy was to open only one femoral access site primarily, so a second puncture was needed only for the kissing balloon technique at the aortic bifurcation. The primary endpoint was a 1-year duplex-based primary patency; secondary endpoints included acute technical success (residual stenosis <30%), secondary patency, and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Results were stratified by lesion morphology, which was classified according to the TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC II) document. RESULTS: Most of the interventions were done in the iliac arteries (n=1337); 292 cases involved the aortic bifurcation, and 83 cases were in the distal aorta/aortic bifurcation. The mean follow-up was 3.24 years (range 0-12.7). In the entire study cohort, the 12- and 24-month restenosis, TLR, and primary/secondary patency rates did not differ among TASC II A-D subgroups. The symptom-driven TLR in the entire cohort was 8% and 9% at the 12- and 24-month follow-up, leading to secondary patency rates of 96% and 91% in the entire cohort. Outcomes for complex interventions in the distal aorta or aortic bifurcation did not differ significantly compared to the total cohort. The overall survival without restenosis, amputation, or surgery in TASC II subgroups A+B was higher (69.6%±1.5%) compared to TASC II C+D lesions (62.8%±1.9%, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: The indication for percutaneous intervention in aortoiliac occlusive disease can be extended to complex TASC C and D lesions in experienced endovascular centers, even if complex reconstruction of the distal aorta or the aortic bifurcation is indicated.
Subject(s)
Aorta, Abdominal/surgery , Aortic Diseases/surgery , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/surgery , Endovascular Procedures , Iliac Artery/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty has been established as the first-line therapy for femoropopliteal artery disease. The primary objectives of the study were to evaluate the performance and the safety of the GORE-DCB Catheter in the treatment of atherosclerotic femoropopliteal lesions in patients with peripheral artery disease for CE-Mark approval. METHODS: Prospective, single-arm, multicenter study with 24 months follow-up. The GORE-DCB Catheter consists of a drug-coated nylon (inner layer)/ePTFE (outer layer) composite balloon. The ePTFE layer is coated with paclitaxel (concentration: 3.5 µg/mm2) and the excipient stearic acid/tromethamine (tris). The primary endpoints were 6-month late lumen loss (LLL) and 30-day of freedom from Major Adverse Events (MAE). RESULTS: Fifty-two subjects were enrolled, 69% men, median age 69 (49-83) years. Acute device success was 100%, the 30-day MAE rate was zero. Study primary endpoint of LLL (-0.17 mm) showed significant superiority compared to the performance goal of uncoated PTA balloon catheters from literature. At 1 and 2 years, primary patency rates were 81.8% and 68.7%, respectively, and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization rates was 87.9% and 83.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that the treatment of lesions in femoropopliteal arteries with the GORE-DCB Catheter is safe and effective.
Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon , Peripheral Arterial Disease , Vascular Access Devices , Male , Humans , Aged , Female , Popliteal Artery , Treatment Outcome , Prospective Studies , Coated Materials, Biocompatible , Femoral Artery , Angioplasty, Balloon/adverse effects , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Peripheral Arterial Disease/etiology , Urinary Catheters , Paclitaxel/pharmacologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the influence of dual antiplatelet therapy vs. aspirin alone on local platelet activation and clinical endpoints in patients with PAD treated with endovascular therapy. METHODS: Patients received either 500 mg aspirin and 300 mg clopidogrel before intervention followed by a daily dose of 100 mg aspirin and 75 mg clopidogrel for 6 months, or the same doses of aspirin plus placebo instead of clopidogrel. Primary endpoints were local concentrations of platelet activation markers ß-thromboglobulin and CD40L, and the rate of patient's resistant to clopidogrel. Secondary endpoints included the clinical development 6 months after the intervention. RESULTS: Eighty patients, 40 in each group, were enrolled. The median peri-interventional concentration of ß-TG was 224.5 vs. 365.5 (P = 0.03) in the clopidogrel and placebo group. The concentration of CD40L was 127 and 206.5 (P = 0.05). Thirty per cent of patients who had received clopidogrel were resistant. Two clopidogrel and eight placebo patients required TLR (P = 0.04). The clopidogrel patients who needed revascularisation were both resistant to clopidogrel. Minor bleeding complications occurred in one clopidogrel and two placebo patients. CONCLUSION: Dual antiplatetet therapy reduces peri-interventional platelet activation and improves functional outcome without higher bleeding complications. An individual tailored dual antiplatelet therapy seems desirable for endovascularly treated patients with PAD.
Subject(s)
Angioplasty/adverse effects , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Peripheral Arterial Disease/surgery , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Thrombosis/drug therapy , Thrombosis/etiology , Aged , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Peripheral Arterial Disease/complications , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
AIMS: Preliminary reports indicate that sirolimus-eluting stents reduce the risk of restenosis after percutaneous infrapopliteal artery revascularization. We conducted a prospective, randomized, multi-centre, double-blind trial comparing a polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent with a placebo-coated bare-metal stent in patients with either intermittent claudication or critical limb ischaemia who had a de-novo lesion in an infrapopliteal artery. METHODS AND RESULTS: 161 patients were included in this trial. The mean target lesion length was 31 ± 9 mm. The main study endpoint was the 1-year primary patency rate, defined as freedom from in-stent-restenosis (luminal narrowing of ≥50%) detected with duplex ultrasound if not appropriate with angiography. Secondary endpoints included the 6-month primary patency rate, secondary patency rate, and changes in Rutherford-Becker classification after 1 year. Twenty-five (15.5%) patients died during the follow-up period. One hundred and twenty-five patients reached the 1-year examinations. The 1-year primary patency rate was significantly higher in the sirolimus-eluting stent group (80.6%) than in the bare-metal stent group (55.6%, P= 0.004), and the 1-year secondary patency rates were 91.9 and 71.4% (P= 0.005), respectively. The median (interquartile range) change in Rutherford-Becker classification after 1 year was -2 (-3 to -1) in the sirolimus-eluting stent group and -1 (-2 to 0) in the bare-metal stent group, respectively (P= 0.004). CONCLUSION: Mid-term patency rates of focal infrapopliteal lesions are substantially improved with sirolimus-eluting stent compared with bare-metal stent. Corresponding to the technical results, the changes in Rutherford-Becker classification reveal a significant advantage for the sirolimus-eluting stent.
Subject(s)
Arterial Occlusive Diseases/drug therapy , Drug-Eluting Stents , Popliteal Artery , Sirolimus/administration & dosage , Tubulin Modulators/administration & dosage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angioplasty, Balloon , Double-Blind Method , Female , Graft Survival , Humans , Intermittent Claudication/drug therapy , Ischemia/drug therapy , Leg/blood supply , Male , Prospective Studies , Reperfusion/methods , Secondary Prevention , Treatment Outcome , Vascular PatencyABSTRACT
Interventional therapies using angioplasty and stenting of symptomatic stenosis of the proximal supraaortic vessels have evolved as safe and effective treatment strategies. The aim of this paper is to summarize the current treatment concepts for stenosis in the subclavian and brachiocephalic artery with regard to clinical indication, interventional technique including selection of the appropriate vascular approach and type of stent, angiographic and clinical short-term and long-term results and follow-up. The role of hybrid interventions for tandem stenoses of the carotid bifurcation and brachiocephalic artery is analysed. A systematic review of data for angioplasty and stenting of symptomatic extracranial vertebral artery stenosis is discussed with a special focus on restenosis rate.
Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon/methods , Brachiocephalic Trunk , Carotid Stenosis/therapy , Stents , Subclavian Steal Syndrome/therapy , Vertebrobasilar Insufficiency/therapy , Angiography , Carotid Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Combined Modality Therapy , Endarterectomy, Carotid , Humans , Intracranial Embolism/prevention & control , Recurrence , Subclavian Steal Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Vertebrobasilar Insufficiency/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: So far only 1-year data have been reported for direct comparisons of paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCBs) using different coating technologies. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to report the 24-month results on the efficacy and safety of low-dose vs high-dose PCBs with nominal paclitaxel densities of 2.0 and 3.5 µg/mm2 and different coating technologies for femoropopliteal interventions from the COMPARE (Compare I Pilot Study for the Treatment of Subjects With Symptomatic Femoropopliteal Artery Disease) trial. Procedural characteristics of clinically driven (CD) target lesion revascularization (TLR) were analyzed. METHODS: Within a prospective, multicenter, clinical trial, 414 patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal lesions (Rutherford categories 2-4, maximum lesion length 30 cm) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to endovascular treatment with either a low-dose (Ranger) or a high-dose (IN.PACT) PCB after stratification for lesion length. Two-year follow-up included assessment of primary patency (defined as absence of CD TLR or binary restenosis with a peak systolic velocity ratio >2.4 by duplex ultrasound), safety, and functional and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: At 2 years, the Kaplan-Meier estimates of primary patency were 70.6% and 71.4% for the low-dose and high-dose PCBs (log-rank P = 0.96), respectively. One major amputation occurred in the high-dose group, and rates of all-cause mortality (3.6% vs 2.2%; P = 0.55) and CD TLR (17.3% vs 13.0%; P = 0.31) were similar between the groups. Among a total of 57 CD TLRs, 44.6% were performed for reocclusion and 28.1% for in-stent restenosis. Functional and clinical benefits over baseline were sustained in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-year results of the COMPARE trial demonstrate a sustained treatment benefit of both low-dose and high-dose PCBs for femoropopliteal interventions including a wide range of lesion lengths. (Compare I Pilot Study for the Treatment of Subjects With Symptomatic Femoropopliteal Artery Disease; NCT02701543).
Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon , Cardiovascular Agents , Peripheral Arterial Disease , Polychlorinated Biphenyls , Vascular Access Devices , Humans , Paclitaxel/adverse effects , Popliteal Artery/diagnostic imaging , Angioplasty, Balloon/adverse effects , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnostic imaging , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Prospective Studies , Pilot Projects , Cardiovascular Agents/adverse effects , Coated Materials, Biocompatible , Vascular Patency , Treatment Outcome , Time Factors , Femoral Artery/diagnostic imaging , Constriction, PathologicABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess 5-year effectiveness and safety of femoropopliteal angioplasty with the Luminor® 35 drug-coated balloon (DCB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The EffPac trial was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that enrolled 171 patients of Rutherford category 2 to 4 with medium length femoropopliteal lesions. Patients were allocated 1:1 to either Luminor® 35 DCB angioplasty or plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA). Assessment at 5 years included primary patency, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), clinical improvement, and target limb amputation. Long-term vital status was ascertained in 97.1% of the participants. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier curves at 5 years demonstrate a primary patency of 61.4% after DCB angioplasty and 53.5% after POBA (log-rank p = 0.040) with a decreasing difference throughout the observation period. Freedom from TLR was 82.1% and 73.7%, respectively (log-rank p = 0.050). Incidence of primary clinical improvement was similar between groups (61% DCB vs. 64% POBA, p = 0.94). Major target limb amputation was necessary in one POBA-group participant. Freedom from all-cause death at 5 years was 88.5% after DCB and 86.0% after POBA (log-rank p = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Primary patency after femoropopliteal DCB angioplasty remained superior to POBA throughout 5 years, however, with decreasing difference. Clinical improvement, freedom from TLR, and all-cause mortality were similar between groups over the long term. (Effectiveness of Paclitaxel-Coated Luminor® Balloon Catheter Versus Uncoated Balloon Catheter in the Superficial Femoral Artery [EffPac]; NCT02540018).