Safety and efficacy results from an international expanded access programme to bortezomib for patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma: a subset analysis of the Australian and New Zealand data of 111 patients.

BACKGROUND: Bortezomib has been shown to be a safe and efficacious for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Here we report a subset analysis of Australian and New Zealand data from the International Extended Access Programme for bortezomib. METHODS: Patients with more than or equal to two prior lines of therapy were given bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) (i.v. bolus days 1, 4, 8, 11) for up to eight 21-day cycles (C). Dexamethasone, 20 mg/day p. o. on the day of, and day after, bortezomib was added after C2 for progressive disease or after C4 for stable disease. Efficacy was assessed using modified Southwest Oncology Group criteria in the intent-to-treat group. Results were compared between the Australian and New Zealand and international cohort. RESULTS: One hundred and eleven patients from 16 centres (55% men, median age 61.9 years) had a median of 5.2 +/- 2.8 treatment cycles of bortezomib. Among them, 82% had > or =3 prior therapies. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 57 patients (52%); the most common were thrombocytopenia (25.7%), anaemia (8.3%), peripheral neuropathy (7.3%) and diarrhoea (7.3%). Responses were evaluable in 106 patients: 22% achieved a best response of complete response/response and 20% partial response (overall response rate of 42%). Median times to first and best responses were 42 days and 69 days, respectively. Compared with the international cohort, the cohorts from Australian and New Zealand showed inferior overall response rates (54 vs 42%, P = 0.001), possibly due to heavier pretreatment (82% greater than or equal to three prior therapies vs 68%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our analysis confirms that bortezomib is safe and effective in relapsed and refractory MM in a real-life clinical setting.

Sex differences in analgesic response to ibuprofen are influenced by expectancy: a randomized, crossover, balanced placebo-designed study.

AIM: To determine whether there is a sex difference in placebo and ibuprofen analgesia expectancy. METHODS: We measured detection and tolerance thresholds for electrically induced pain in the ear lobe in healthy subjects (10 male, 10 female) to study sex differences in expectancy following either ibuprofen 800 mg or placebo in four different expectancy states. Subjects took ibuprofen or placebo in a two-by-two factorial design (the balanced placebo design). We randomly assigned subjects to start in one of the four expectancy states. We analysed the results using analysis of variance for repeated measures with baseline pain as a covariate. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: We found no sex difference in baseline pain threshold or tolerance levels. When partitioned by sex and expectancy state, analgesia only occurred in males during positive expectancy states at 2, 3 and 4 h post-placebo, and at 1 and 2 h post-ibuprofen. The time course of analgesic action in males was as expected considering the pharmacokinetic profile of ibuprofen. Our study found that dosages of 800 mg of ibuprofen are ineffective in producing analgesia in women regardless of their expectations. We hypothesize that ibuprofen analgesia is produced by a combination of specific pharmacological effects and a non-specific beta endorphin-mediated placebo effect. Whatever the mechanism responsible for the analgesic response seen in males, this research re-emphasizes the importance of psychological factors in determining drug response. It also shows that these factors can differ between men and women, and thus the contribution of psychological factors on analgesia needs to be seriously re-evaluated.