Real-world experience of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: long-term results of the prospective ABItude study.

BACKGROUND: Limited real-world data exist on the effectiveness and safety of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (abiraterone hereafter) in the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) naive to chemotherapy. Most of the few available studies had a retrospective design and included a small number of patients. In the interim analysis of the ABItude study, abiraterone showed good clinical effectiveness and safety profile in the chemotherapy-naive setting over a median follow-up of 18 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone as for clinical practice in the Italian, observational, prospective, multicentric ABItude study. mCRPC patients were enrolled at abiraterone start (February 2016-June 2017) and followed up for 3 years; clinical endpoints and PROs, including quality of life (QoL) and pain, were prospectively collected. Kaplan-Meier curves were estimated. RESULTS: Of the 481 patients enrolled, 454 were assessable for final study analyses. At abiraterone start, the median age was 77 years, with 58.6% elderly patients and 69% having at least one comorbidity (57.5% cardiovascular diseases). Visceral metastases were present in 8.4% of patients. Over a median follow-up of 24.8 months, median progression-free survival (any progression reported by the investigators), time to abiraterone discontinuation, and overall survival were, respectively, 17.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 14.1-19.4 months], 16.0 months (95% CI 13.1-18.2 months), and 37.3 months (95% CI 36.5 months-not estimable); 64.2% of patients achieved ≥50% reduction in prostate-specific antigen. QoL assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate, the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level, and European Quality of Life Visual Analog Scale remained stable during treatment. Median time to pain progression according to Brief Pain Inventory data was 31.1 months (95% CI 24.8 months-not estimable). Sixty-two patients (13.1%) had at least one adverse drug reaction (ADR) and 8 (1.7%) one serious ADR. CONCLUSION: With longer follow-up, abiraterone therapy remains safe, well tolerated, and active in a large unselected population.

Radical metastasectomy followed by sorafenib versus observation in patients withclear cell renal cell carcinoma: extended follow -up of efficacy results from the randomized phase II RESORT trial.

Background: The RESORT trial showed no longer relapse free survival (RFS) with sorafenib following radical metastasectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. We present the updated 42-month follow-up data.Methods: The phase II RESORT trial randomized patients to sorafenib or observation within 12 weeks from surgery. RFS was the primary endpoint.Results: We analyzed 68 patients (32 in sorafenib and 36 in the observation arm), randomized between November 2012 and November 2017. Eighty-one percent in the sorafenib arm and 80% in the observation arm had one metastasis . At a median follow-up of 42 months (interquartile range 31-58), in the observation arm the median RFS was 35 months, RFS probability was 57% (95% CI 42-76%) at 24 and 44% (95% CI 30-65%) at 48 months. In the sorafenib arm, median RFS was 21 months, RFS probability was 50% (95% CI 34-71%) at 24 and 32% (95% CI 18-57%) at 48 months (p = 0.342;HR 1.35;95% CI 0.72-2.54). Forty-seven percent and 37.5% of the patients in the two arms, respectively, are disease free. The site of relapses was independent of the previous metastasectomy site.Expert commentary: Sorafenib after metastasectomy did not improve RFS, but surgery in selected patients should be considered in order to potentially improve survival.Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT0144480.

Biomolecular pathogenesis of borderline ovarian tumors: focusing target discovery through proteogenomics.

Tumors of the epithelial surface account for about 80% of all ovarian neoplasms and exhibit a heterogeneous histological classification affecting survival. Tumors of low malignant potential, defined as borderline ovarian tumors(BOTs), have a markedly better survival and low recurrence, even if surgery still represents the common management for this type of cancer. It is still debated in the literature if BOTs can be considered as intermediate precursors in the progression to high grade ovarian tumors. Evidences now propose that high-grade serous carcinomas are not associated with a defined precursor lesion. Together with histopathological studies, mutations of KRAS, BRAF and p53 genes, microsatellite instability (MSI)and under- or over-expression of many genes and proteins have been used to address this question. Despite the large body of data summarized, a limited number of molecules proved to be useful in elucidating BOTs pathogenesis and only a few of these showed possible application in the therapy. We believe that high-throughput technologies would help to overcome these limitations offering the promise of a better understanding of BOTs classification. The aim is to guide the diagnosis and prognosis of BOTs to develop new possible therapeutic molecular targets avoiding surgery.

Lapatinib in breast cancer: clinical experiences and future perspectives.

Lapatinib, an orally available dual inhibitor targeting the tyrosine-kinase domain of both epidermal growth factor receptor-1 and 2, has been introduced for the treatment of advanced/metastatic HER2+ breast cancer in combination with capacitabine after chemotherapy regimens containing anthracycline, taxanes and trastuzumab. Moreover, lapatinib is under investigation in combination with anthracycline and taxanes in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. Another potential field of investigation for this drug is related to its ability to restore hormonal sensitivity of HER2-, hormone-receptor positive breast cancer cells. This paper reviews the current use of lapatinib in breast cancer and its future perspectives.

Clinical and therapeutic perspectives of gene expression profiling for breast cancer.

The standard method for defining prognosis for patients with breast cancer is an integrated model including clinicopathological features, such as tumour size, histological grade, nodal involvement, hormone receptor status and HER-2 overexpression. Nowadays, two multigene prognostic models can stratify patients in new categories of risk. Notably, clinicopathological prognostic prediction and genomic signatures are discordant in at least 30% of cases. For this reason, two trials are going on, aiming to validate clinical utility of gene profiling. As regards the predictive value of genomic assays, many models have been carried out, demonstrating the capacity to identify with high sensitivity and specificity resistant and non-resistant tumours, differently from the traditional markers. These predictors, however, need to be validated by prospective clinical trials.