Conventional clinical signs and symptoms are poor predictors of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak: A single-centre cohort perspective.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak remains a concerning complication of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for skull base pathology. Signs and symptoms suggesting CSF leak often trigger additional workup during the postoperative course. We systematically evaluate associations between subjectively reported clinical signs/symptoms noted during the immediate postoperative period and incidence of postoperative CSF leaks. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was conducted at a tertiary academic medical centre including 137 consecutive patients with intraoperative CSF leak during EEA with primary repair between July 2018 and August 2022. Postoperative CSF leak associations with clinical signs and symptoms were evaluated using positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), sensitivity, specificity and odds ratio (OR) via univariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients (57.7%) had high-flow leaks repaired and 5 (3.6%) developed CSF leaks postoperatively. Of reported symptoms, rhinorrhea was most common (n = 52, 38.0%; PPV [95% CI] = 7.6% [4.8%, 11.9%]), followed by severe headache (n = 47, 34.3%; 6.3% [3.1%, 12.5%]), dizziness (n = 43, 31.4%; 2.3% [0.4%, 12.1%]), salty or metallic taste (n = 20, 14.6%; 9.9% [3.3%, 25.8%]), and throat drainage (n = 10, 7.3%; 9.9% [1.7%, 41.4%]). Nausea or vomiting constituted the most reported sign concerning for CSF leak (n = 73, 53.3%; PPV [95% CI] = 4.1% [2.0%, 8.1%]). On univariate regression, no sign or symptom, including rhinorrhea (OR [95% CI] = 7.00 [0.76-64.44]), throat drainage (3.42 [0.35-33.86]), salty/metallic taste (4.22 [0.66-27.04]), severe headache (3.00 [0.48-18.62]), dizziness (0.54 [0.06-4.94]), fever (3.16 [0.50-19.99]), and nausea/vomiting (1.33 [0.22-8.21]), associated with postoperative CSF leak. CONCLUSIONS: A range of subjectively reported symptoms and signs failed to predict postoperative CSF leak. Further investigation is warranted to inform appropriate attention and response.

Characteristics and Outcomes in Pediatric Versus Adult Craniopharyngiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Craniopharyngiomas account for 1.2% to 4.6% of all intracranial tumors. Although age at presentation is distributed bimodally, with a pediatric peak occurring between 5 and 15 years and an adult peak between 50 and 70 years, presentation, treatment, and outcome differences between these two craniopharyngioma populations have not been thoroughly characterized. OBJECTIVE: To compare treatments and outcomes between adult and pediatric craniopharyngiomas. METHODS: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis. Web of Science, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases were searched for primary studies reporting postoperative complications, functional outcomes, recurrence, and overall survival in patients with craniopharyngioma undergoing surgery. RESULTS: The search yielded 1,202 unique articles, of which 106 (n=4,202 patients) met criteria for qualitative synthesis and 23 (n=735 patients) met criteria for meta-analysis. Compared with adult, pediatric craniopharyngiomas were less likely to present with visual defects (odds ratio [OR] 0.54, 95% CI 0.36-0.80) or cognitive impairment (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12-0.71) and more likely with headaches (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.16-3.73). Children presented with significantly larger tumors compared with adults (standardized mean difference 0.68, 95% CI 0.38-0.97). Comparing functional outcomes, pediatric patients sustained higher rates of permanent diabetes insipidus (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.13-2.56), obesity (OR 3.15, 95% CI 1.19-8.31), and cranial nerve and/or neurological defects (OR 4.87, 95% CI 1.78-13.31) than adults. No significant differences were found in rates of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak, overall or progression-free survival, or recurrence. CONCLUSION: Adult and pediatric craniopharyngiomas seem to have fundamental differences in clinical presentation and functional outcomes. These patients frequently require multimodality treatment and are best managed with a multidisciplinary team and an individualized approach.