Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 74
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Psychol Med ; 46(2): 291-301, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26387583

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Functional remediation is a novel intervention with demonstrated efficacy at improving functional outcome in euthymic bipolar patients. However, in a previous trial no significant changes in neurocognitive measures were detected. The objective of the present analysis was to test the efficacy of this therapy in the enhancement of neuropsychological functions in a subgroup of neurocognitively impaired bipolar patients. METHOD: A total of 188 out of 239 DSM-IV euthymic bipolar patients performing below two standard deviations from the mean of normative data in any neurocognitive test were included in this subanalysis. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were conducted to assess the impact of the treatment arms [functional remediation, psychoeducation, or treatment as usual (TAU)] on participants' neurocognitive and functional outcomes in the subgroup of neurocognitively impaired patients. RESULTS: Patients receiving functional remediation (n = 56) showed an improvement on delayed free recall when compared with the TAU (n = 63) and psychoeducation (n = 69) groups as shown by the group × time interaction at 6-month follow-up [F 2,158 = 3.37, degrees of freedom (df) = 2, p = 0.037]. However, Tukey post-hoc analyses revealed that functional remediation was only superior when compared with TAU (p = 0.04), but not with psychoeducation (p = 0.10). Finally, the patients in the functional remediation group also benefited from the treatment in terms of functional outcome (F 2,158 = 4.26, df = 2, p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Functional remediation is effective at improving verbal memory and psychosocial functioning in a sample of neurocognitively impaired bipolar patients at 6-month follow-up. Neurocognitive enhancement may be one of the active ingredients of this novel intervention, and, specifically, verbal memory appears to be the most sensitive function that improves with functional remediation.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/rehabilitation , Cognition Disorders/rehabilitation , Mental Recall , Psychiatric Rehabilitation/methods , Verbal Learning , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Cognition Disorders/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Memory , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Patient Education as Topic
2.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 133(2): 102-108, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26010130

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We examined the relationship between biological rhythms and severity of depressive symptoms in subjects with bipolar disorder and the effects of biological rhythms alterations on functional impairment. METHOD: Bipolar patients (n = 260) and healthy controls (n = 191) were recruited from mood disorders programs in three sites (Spain, Brazil, and Canada). Parameters of biological rhythms were measured using the Biological Rhythms Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (BRIAN), an interviewer administered questionnaire that assesses disruptions in sleep, eating patterns, social rhythms, and general activity. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses of covariance showed significant intergroup differences after controlling for potential confounders (Pillai's F = 49.367; df = 2, P < 0.001). Depressed patients had the greatest biological rhythms disturbance, followed by patients with subsyndromal symptoms, euthymic patients, and healthy controls. Biological rhythms and HAMD scores were independent predictors of poor functioning (F = 12.841, df = 6, P < 0.001, R2  = 0.443). CONCLUSION: Our study shows a dose-dependent association between the severity of depressive symptoms and degree of biological rhythms disturbance. Biological rhythms disturbance was also an independent predictor of functional impairment. Although the directionality of this relationship remains unknown, our results suggest that stability of biological rhythms should be an important target of acute and long-term management of bipolar disorder and may aid in the improvement of functioning.

3.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 132(5): 389-99, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25900393

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study the prevalence of attention-deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adult patients with bipolar disorder (BD) and identify differential clinical features for a better diagnosis. METHOD: A total of 163 euthymic bipolar out-patients were screened for ADHD with the ASRS.V1 and the WURS at a BD Unit. Patients with a positive screening were assessed with the CAADID, at an ADHD unit. Sociodemographic and clinical features of the groups with and without ADHD were compared. RESULTS: Lifetime prevalence of comorbid ADHD was 17.9% (10.5% for adult ADHD and 7.4% for childhood ADHD). The BD + ADHD group showed more suicidal behaviour although less severe. Comorbidity was also more common, especially regarding substance use disorders. Nevertheless, these patients did not show more affective episodes or hospitalizations and suffered more atypical but less melancholic depression. However, they required more treatment with psychotherapy and valproate. One-third of positive screenings at the ASRS were false; a severe course of BD was the hallmark of this subgroup. CONCLUSION: Adult patients with BD and ADHD show differential clinical features, but not a more severe course of BD. Comorbidity with substance abuse is a big issue, deserving special clinical attention. Better screening tools are necessary to avoid overdiagnosis of comorbid ADHD in BD.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Adult , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence
4.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 130(5): 364-73, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24702648

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze differences in clinical and socio-demographic characteristics between older and younger bipolar outpatients paying special attention to depressive symptoms in a large, naturalistic cohort. METHOD: Five hundred and ninety-three DSM-IV-TR bipolar outpatients were enrolled. Clinical characteristics were assessed according to DSM-IV-TR (SCID-I). Subjects were categorized into two groups according to current age (older OBD: age > 65 years; younger-YBD: age < 65 years). RESULTS: About 80% of patients were younger (N = 470), and a fifth were older (N = 123), with a mean age of 77.30 years in OBD. Older patients were more likely to be married, not qualified, bipolar II, with depressive polarity of first episode, higher age at illness onset, higher age at first hospitalization. They were more likely to present with depressive predominant polarity, with lifetime history of catatonic, psychotic and melancholic features, age at illness onset >40 years, as well as suffering from more medical comorbidities when compared to younger bipolars. CONCLUSION: The clinical presentation of bipolar disorder in late life would be defined more frequently by melancholic depressive features and a predominantly depressive polarity. These results suggest that treatment strategies for elderly bipolar patients should focus in the prevention of depressive episodes.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Age Factors , Age of Onset , Aged , Cohort Studies , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Female , Geriatric Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Marital Status/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Socioeconomic Factors , Spain/epidemiology
5.
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl ; (442): 11-8, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23581788

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This article reviews psychological therapies in the treatment of bipolar disorder, in particular psychoeducation, and how the inclusion of four fundamental principles - patient/therapist communication, flow of information, patient involvement and a trusting relationship - can improve patient outcomes. METHOD: The content of this article is based on the proceedings of a 1-day standalone symposium in November 2011 exploring how to establish a bipolar clinic within the context of existing services in the UK's National Health Service. RESULTS: Certain psychological interventions have emerged as beneficial add-on treatments to pharmacotherapy in bipolar disorder and are associated with greater stabilisation of symptoms, fewer relapses and longer time to relapse. Psychoeducation is a simple approach to support prevention of future episodes by delivering behavioural training to improve illness insight, early symptom identification and development of coping strategies. Empowering patients to actively participate in their treatment provides independence, counteracts the current disconnect of therapist and patient, and increases awareness and understanding of the challenges of living with and treating bipolar disorder. CONCLUSION: Psychoeducation enables patients to understand bipolar disorder, get actively involved in therapy planning, and be aware of methods for episode prevention, therefore effectively contributing to improved treatment outcomes and patient quality of life.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder , Patient Education as Topic , Psychotherapy/methods , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Self Care/methods , Behavioral Symptoms/therapy , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Humans , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Patient Education as Topic/organization & administration , Patient Medication Knowledge/methods , Psychotherapeutic Processes , Secondary Prevention , State Medicine , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom
6.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 128(3): 194-202, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23331090

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify psychopathological factors associated with long-term functional outcome in euthymic bipolar disorder patients and to test new measures of mood instability and symptoms intensity. METHOD: Fifty-five patients with more than 12 months of follow-up were included. In addition to traditional clinical variables, the time spent ill was documented using a modified life-charting technique based on NIHM life-charting method. New measures, Mood Instability Factor, and Mood Intensity Factor were defined and assessed. Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) was used to assess disability. RESULTS: The follow-up period was 3.00 ± 1.51 years. Weeks with subsyndromal depressive symptoms (ß = 0.133, t = 2.556, P = 0.014), weeks with mild manic symptoms (ß = 1.441, t = 3.10, P = 0.003), and the Mood Instability Factor (ß = 0.105, t = 3.593, P = 0.001) contributed to approximately 46% of the FAST total score variance. CONCLUSION: New methodologies including subsyndromal symptoms and mood instability parameters might contribute to understand the worse long-term functional outcome that affects a considerable percentage of BD patients even after episode remission. Concerns about therapeutic approaches are discussed.


Subject(s)
Affective Symptoms/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder , Depression/diagnosis , Symptom Assessment , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Disease Progression , Employee Performance Appraisal , Female , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Male , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Recovery of Function , Symptom Assessment/methods , Symptom Assessment/trends , Time
7.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 127(2): 153-8, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22943487

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of psychoeducation in the symptomatic and functional recovery, and quality of life (QoL) in a sample of patients with bipolar disorder (BD). METHOD: The sample comprised 55 patients with BD I and II in remission (Young Mania Rating Scale ≤6 and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale ≤7). Out-patients were matched assigned to receive 16 sessions of psychoeducation [experimental group (EG)] or 16 sessions of placebo without psychoeducation [control group (CG)]. Groups were evaluated at study baseline, midpoint, endpoint, and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. RESULTS: No significant differences between the groups were found for the variables evaluated (mood symptoms, functioning and QoL), except for overall clinical improvement, subjectively perceived by EG subjects. Both groups showed a trend toward improved clinical global impression and QoL (environmental). No reduction in mood symptoms or improvement in psychosocial functioning was observed. Psychosocial treatment compliance was positively correlated with global functioning, social adjustment, sociability, and global clinical impression. CONCLUSION: Sixteen session psychoeducation seems to be ineffective to prevent mood episodes or improve functioning in a sample of bipolar patients.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Patient Education as Topic , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance/psychology , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Psychotherapy , Quality of Life/psychology , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
8.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 125(5): 412-8, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22321052

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyze demographical, clinical, and therapeutic variables that may be associated with pharmacological non-adherence in a sample of schizoaffective patients, bipolar type. METHOD: Adherence to treatment and its clinical correlates were assessed at the end of a 10-year follow-up in 76 patients meeting DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. Adherent and poorly adherent patients were compared regarding clinical and therapeutic variables. RESULTS: The rate of poorly adherent patients was 32/76 (41.2%) of the sample. Adherent patients were more likely to have presented an affective episode at illness onset and to have fewer purely - non-affective - psychotic episodes. Demographic or other clinical variables were not found to be associated to treatment adherence. Family history for psychiatric disorders or suicide did not correlate either, and neither did any specific pharmacological agent. CONCLUSION: Rates of non-adherence in schizoaffective disorder are high. Adherence seems to be associated to a more affective course of illness (affective first episode and fewer purely psychotic episodes). Patients with more prominent schizophrenia-like characteristics could be at higher risk for poor adherence and need to be closely followed and monitored. Even when properly treated, schizoaffective disorder is a disabling and severe disorder with high risk for recurrences.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/complications , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Psychotic Disorders/complications , Risk Factors
9.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 56: 4-12, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34875491

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic is expected to increase suicidal behavior. However, data available to date are inconsistent. This study examines suicidal thoughts and behaviors and suicide trends in 2020 relative to 2019 as an approximation to the impact of the pandemic on suicidal behavior and death in the general population of Catalonia, Spain. Data on suicide-related thoughts and behaviors (STBs) and suicidal mortality were obtained from the Catalonia Suicide Risk Code (CSRC) register and the regional police, respectively. We compared the monthly crude incidence of STBs and suicide mortality rates of 2020 with those of 2019. Joinpoint regression analysis was used to assess changes in trends over time during the studied period. In 2020, 4,263 consultations for STBs and 555 suicide deaths were registered in Catalonia (approx. 7.5 million inhabitants). Compared to 2019, in 2020 STBs rates decreased an average of 6.3% (incidence rate ratio, IRR=0.94, 95% CI 0,90-0,98) and overall suicide death rates increased 1.2% (IRR=1.01, 95% CI 0.90-1.13). Joinpoint regression results showed a substantial decrease in STBs rates with a monthly percent change (MPC) of -22.1 (95% CI: -41.1, 2.9) from January-April 2020, followed by a similar increase from April-July 2020 (MPC=24.7, 95% CI: -5.9, 65.2). The most restrictive measures implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic reduced consultations for STBs, suggesting that the "stay at home" message may have discouraged people from contacting mental health services. STBs and mortality should continue to be monitored in 2021 and beyond to understand better the mid-to-long term impact of COVID-19 on suicide trends.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Suicide , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Spain/epidemiology , Suicidal Ideation , Suicide, Attempted
11.
Br J Psychiatry ; 194(3): 260-5, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19252157

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The long-term efficacy of psychological interventions for bipolar disorders has not been tested. AIMS: This study assessed the efficacy of group psychoeducation to prevent recurrences and to reduce time spent ill for people with bipolar disorders. METHOD: A randomised controlled trial with masked outcome assessment comparing group psychoeducation and non-structured group intervention during 5-year follow-up. One hundred and twenty people with bipolar disorders were included in the study and 99 completed 5-year follow-up. Time to any recurrence, number of recurrences, total number of days spent ill, frequency and length of hospitalisations were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: At the 5-year follow-up, time to any recurrence was longer for the psychoeducation group (log rank=9.953, P<0.002). The psychoeducation group had fewer recurrences (3.86 v. 8.37, F=23.6, P<0.0001) of any type and they spent less time acutely ill (154 v. 586 days, F=31.66, P=0.0001). The median number of days of hospitalisation per hospitalised participant was also lower for the psychoeducation group (45 v. 30, F=4.26, P=0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Six-month group psychoeducation has long-lasting prophylactic effects in individuals with bipolar disorders. Group psychoeducation is the first psychological intervention showing such a long-term maintained efficacy in people with bipolar disorders.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Psychotherapy, Group , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Bipolar Disorder/prevention & control , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance , Secondary Prevention , Single-Blind Method , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
12.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 120(1): 30-6, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19183125

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: There is a dearth of research focusing on factors associated with suicide attempts. High rates of atypical depression have been reported in studies including unipolar and bipolar II patients. In this study, the association between suicide attempt and atypical depression, in addition to other major risk factors, was evaluated in 390 bipolar I and II out-patients. METHOD: Variables were defined according to DSM-IV criteria, and assessed with a Structured Interview for DSM-IV (axis I and II). History of suicide attempt was obtained through interviews with patients and relatives. Attempters and non-attempters were compared using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Attempters showed significantly higher rates of atypical depression, family history of completed suicide, depression at index episode and cluster B personality disorder. CONCLUSION: Our results highlight the relevance of atypical depression in bipolar disorder. A more accurate identification of potential attempters may contribute to the development of effective preventive treatment strategies.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Suicide, Attempted/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder/genetics , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Comorbidity , Confidence Intervals , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/genetics , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/psychology , Humans , Interview, Psychological , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Personality Disorders/diagnosis , Personality Disorders/epidemiology , Personality Disorders/psychology , Risk Factors , Spain , Suicide, Attempted/psychology
13.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 120(6): 429-40, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19740127

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the conceptual and operational definitions of treatment-resistant bipolar depression and to review the evidence-based therapeutic options. METHOD: Structured searches of PubMed, Index Medicus, Excerpta Medica and Psyclit conducted in December 2008. RESULTS: Criteria for treatment resistance in bipolar depression are commonly based on concepts stemming from treatment resistance as defined for unipolar depression, an approach that proved to be inadequate. In fact, the addition of an ad hoc criterion based on lithium and other mood stabilizer unresponsiveness after reaching adequate plasma levels appears to be a patch that attempts to take into account the uniqueness of bipolar depression but fails to become operational. Recent data from randomized clinical trials of new anticonvulsants and second-generation antipsychotics should lead to the development of a modern definition of treatment-resistant bipolar depression, and specific therapeutic algorithms. CONCLUSION: We suggest a redefinition of resistant bipolar I and II depression. We propose different degrees of severity within bipolar depression in a stepwise manner.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/pharmacology , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacology , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Drug Resistance/drug effects , Evidence-Based Practice , Anticonvulsants/pharmacology , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Benzodiazepines/pharmacology , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Dibenzothiazepines/pharmacology , Dibenzothiazepines/therapeutic use , Fluoxetine/pharmacology , Fluoxetine/therapeutic use , Humans , Lithium/pharmacology , Lithium/therapeutic use , Olanzapine , Quetiapine Fumarate , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
14.
J Affect Disord ; 112(1-3): 30-5, 2009 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18486237

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bipolar II represents a significant subgroup of bipolar patients. However, there is limited evidence regarding the efficacy of pharmacological and/or psychosocial therapies. METHOD: Post-hoc analyses were undertaken using data on 20 (out of 120) patients who fulfilled DSM-IV criteria for BP II who had participated in a single-blind randomized controlled treatment trial (RCT) exploring the acute and long-term efficacy of group psychoeducation plus standard pharmacological treatment as compared with unstructured support groups plus standard pharmacological treatment. Eight BP II subjects had been randomized to a psychoeducation group and 12 to an unstructured support group. RESULTS: Psychoeducated, as compared to control group bipolar II patients, had significantly better 5-year outcomes, with lower mean number of BP episodes (p<.02), hypomanic episodes (p<.03) and depressive episodes (p<.03), fewer days spent in mood episodes (p=.004) and higher mean levels of functioning (p<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although these findings should be treated with caution, it appears that psychoeducation plus medication can benefit bipolar II subjects. Dedicated treatment trials will need to clarify whether these therapies require modifications in duration and/or content to meet the needs of bipolar II patients.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/prevention & control , Psychotherapy, Group/methods , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Control Groups , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Follow-Up Studies , Hospitalization , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Secondary Prevention , Single-Blind Method , Social Adjustment , Treatment Outcome
15.
Psychopathology ; 42(4): 209-18, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19451753

ABSTRACT

There is general agreement that DSM-IV and ICD-10 require major improvements in format and content to make them more valid, evidence-based and clinically useful. DSM-IV-TR currently includes a series of clinical features that provide potentially useful information on cross-sectional and longitudinal courses of bipolar disorder. This conceptual and data-driven review proposes changes in the current classification by removing, modifying and adding bipolar episode and course specifiers in DSM-V. Specifiers to be maintained would be 'with catatonic features', 'with melancholic features', 'with atypical features' and 'with rapid cycling'. The 'seasonal pattern' modifier should be amended to allow manic, hypomanic and mixed episodes to be included in the description. Some specifiers should likely be substantially reconceptualized ('severity/psychosis/remission') or removed ('with post-partum onset'). Age at onset (early, intermediate or late onset) and predominant polarity (manic, depressive) should be added for their relevance for course and outcome.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/classification , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Age of Onset , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diagnosis, Differential , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Psychopathology/classification
16.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 118(1): 4-18, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18498432

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper was to review the association of most commonly used psychopharmacological drugs with weight gain in bipolar disorder. METHOD: Information was retrieved from a PubMed/Medline literature search reviewing weight gain in pharmacological studies in bipolar disorder. RESULTS: Obesity and overweight in bipolar disorder are partly related to prescribed drugs with a strong effect of clozapine and olanzapine. Lesser but still relevant weight gain is caused by quetiapine, risperidone, lithium, valproate, gabapentin and by some antidepressants. Ziprasidone, aripiprazole, carbamazepine and lamotrigine do not seem to cause significant overweight. CONCLUSION: Careful monitoring of weight changes in patients before and after drug prescription should be implemented in the clinical routine and drugs which potentially cause weight gain should be avoided in overweight patients with bipolar disorder. Furthermore, eating habits and daily activities should be targeted as they may also have a significant impact on overall health and weight-related issues.


Subject(s)
Antimanic Agents/adverse effects , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Weight Gain/drug effects , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Antimanic Agents/therapeutic use , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Lithium Compounds/adverse effects , Lithium Compounds/therapeutic use , Obesity/chemically induced , Risk Factors
17.
J Affect Disord ; 107(1-3): 45-51, 2008 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17804081

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It has been reported that patients with bipolar disorder (BD) remain about 10 years symptomatic before the correct diagnosis is made. This fact is particularly important for patients with predominantly depressed polarity who tend to be diagnosed as suffering from unipolar major depressive disorder and treated with antidepressants. The present study was carried out to assess clinical differences between predominantly manic and depressed BD patients with a special focus on the time that patients remained undiagnosed. METHODS: Clinical and socio-demographic characteristics were obtained from a sample of 149 euthymic bipolar outpatients. Patients were divided into depressive or manic predominance of polarity. Clinical features, number of years undiagnosed (NYU) and occupational functioning were assessed in the two groups. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were classified as a "Depressive Polarity" whilst forty-seven were considered as "Manic Polarity". Depressive Polarity was associated with a longer delay to be diagnosed (F=14.43, df=89, p=0.001). The predominantly depressive patients tended to present a depressive onset of illness, earlier age of onset, longer duration of illness and higher number of suicide attempts than manic polarity patients. CONCLUSION: There was a marked clinical difference between predominantly manic and depressive bipolar patients. Predominantly depressive polarity is associated with a longer delay in receiving a correct diagnosis and effective treatment which has an important impact on the management of the illness.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Adult , Age of Onset , Ambulatory Care , Bipolar Disorder/classification , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Diagnosis, Differential , Disease Management , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Suicide, Attempted/psychology , Suicide, Attempted/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors , Work Capacity Evaluation
18.
J Psychopharmacol ; 22(6): 590-7, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18515445

ABSTRACT

Of all ethical issues in clinical trial designs, only placebo use is dealt with acrimony and unwarranted, rhetoric emphasis. Many misconceptions are biased and may hamper research in the mechanisms of healing and recovery if placebo is banned from clinical trials, as some influential ethicists propose. Current treatments in psychiatry are by no means optimal and may vary in their effect across studies, rendering difficult to find the best available therapeutic method with which to compare new drugs. Because drugs possess specific mechanisms, it is not possible to compare drugs with different mechanisms as to their relevance in the pathophysiology of a given disorder. Placebo acts through non-specific mechanisms and is the ideal control for any disorder whose pathophysiology is relatively unknown and its treatment is still suboptimal. Sticking to short-term patient benefit in a trial reflects an individualistically oriented thinking in contemporary ethics and is likely to limit further research and efforts to better understand the mechanisms of disease and drug action, but also those related to general body reactance and self-healing, which are enhanced by placebo administration. Because in history ethics are swinging between two opposed views, it is possible that in the near future, the balance will move towards communitarianism, which is more likely to better serve long-term patient needs. Ethicists should also consider some other aspects of human experimentation, such as the consistency of research lines and the trend to substitute older drugs with their metabolites or enantiomers.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic/standards , Ethics, Medical , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Placebos/standards , Psychopharmacology/ethics , Humans , Periodicals as Topic , Publishing
19.
Psychopathology ; 41(2): 111-4, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18059112

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Depression is the predominant mood alteration in bipolar I and II disorders. In this study, the nature of major depressive episodes of bipolar I versus bipolar II patients is specifically assessed, as regards lifetime history of rapid cycling, melancholia, atypical and psychotic symptoms. METHODS: The patient sample consisted of 184 bipolar I and 80 bipolar II patients, according to the research diagnostic criteria, who entered the bipolar disorders program in our hospital. Subsets of patients are compared according to DSM-IV criteria for rapid cycling, melancholic, atypical and psychotic features. RESULTS: Bipolar I patients had significantly more psychotic symptoms in their lifetime histories (p < 0.001), whereas bipolar II patients had significantly more atypical symptoms in their lifetime histories (p < 0.003). Although melancholia was more prevalent in the bipolar I and rapid cycling was more prevalent in the bipolar II subgroup, these differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study suggest that marked differences exist in the nature of major depressive episodes between bipolar I and II patients, as they in the long term emerge from the two conditions. To what extent both conditions are related cannot be ascertained in the present study. Clinical differences may have relevant therapeutic implications and separate trials for bipolar I and bipolar II depression are warranted.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/epidemiology , Adult , Age of Onset , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis , Psychotic Disorders/epidemiology , Psychotic Disorders/psychology , Severity of Illness Index
20.
Psychiatry Res ; 268: 8-14, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29986179

ABSTRACT

The Satispsy-22 scale is an instrument created for the specific evaluation of psychiatric inpatient satisfaction. Therefore, the study aims to carry out the Satispsy-22 scientific translation to Spanish and to learn its psychometric properties. The Satipsy-22-E was administered to discharged patients from four units of acute psychiatric admission, a unit of dual pathology and two units of subacute psychiatric admission (N = 268). Cronbach's alpha was 0.886, which can be interpreted as good internal reliability. All the dimensions showed a good internal consistency with scores from 0.722 to 0.919. Test-retest offered scores of 0.752-0.951 showing good stability. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that all elements load in the estimated dimensions of the original scale and these were significant and the adjustment measures showed, in general, a rather good adjustment, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) showed that the error between observations and actual data is small and acceptable. Satispsy-22-E is a specific scale in Spanish language for the assessment of psychiatric inpatient satisfaction. It is an easy to use tool that offers good psychometric properties. The availability of a validated survey in Spanish may help to improve the care provided by psychiatric wards in Spanish-speaking countries.


Subject(s)
Inpatients/psychology , Language , Patient Satisfaction , Psychiatric Department, Hospital/standards , Psychiatry/standards , Translations , Adult , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Hospitalization/trends , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Department, Hospital/trends , Psychiatry/trends , Reproducibility of Results , Spain/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL