The stimulus effects of 8-OH-DPAT: evidence for a 5-HT2A receptor-mediated component.

A previous investigation in our laboratory found that the stimulus effects of the 5-HT2A agonist, LSD, are potentiated by 5-HT1A receptor agonists including the prototypic agonist, 8-OH-DPAT. Also suggestive of behaviorally relevant interactions between 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors are behavioral analyses of locomotor activity, head-twitch response, forepaw treading and production of the serotonin syndrome; in some instances effects are augmented, in other, diminished. These observations led us in the present investigation to test the hypothesis that stimulus control by 8-OH-DPAT [0.2 mg/kg; 15 min pretreatment time] is modulated by 5-HT2A ligands. Stimulus control was established with 8-OH-DPAT in a group of 10 rats. A two-lever, fixed ratio 10, positively reinforced task with saline controls was employed. As shown previously, stimulus control by 8-OH-DPAT and the generalization of 8-OH-DPAT to the 5-HT1A partial agonist, buspirone, was completely blocked by the selective 5-HT1A antagonist, WAY-100635. In contrast, antagonism by the selective 5-HT2A antagonist, M100907 [0.1 mg/kg; 30 min pretreatment time], of 8-OH-DPAT and of the generalization of 8-OH-DPAT to buspirone was statistically significant but less than complete. In light of our previous conclusions regarding the interactions of 5-HT1A agonists with LSD-induced stimulus control, the present data suggest that the interaction between 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors is bidirectional in drug discrimination studies.

Hallucinogen-like actions of 5-methoxy-N,N-diisopropyltryptamine in mice and rats.

Few studies have examined the effects of 5-methoxy-N,N-diisopropyltryptamine (5-MeO-DIPT) in vivo. In these studies, 5-MeO-DIPT was tested in a drug-elicited head twitch assay in mice where it was compared to the structurally similar hallucinogen N,N-dimethyltryptamine (N,N-DMT) and challenged with the selective serotonin (5-HT)2A antagonist M100907, and in a lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) discrimination assay in rats where its subjective effects were challenged with M100907 or the 5-HT 1A selective antagonist WAY-100635. Finally, the affinity of 5-MeO-DIPT for three distinct 5-HT receptors was determined in rat brain. 5-MeO-DIPT, but not N,N-DMT, induced the head twitch responses in the mouse, and this effect was potently antagonized by prior administration of M100907. In rats trained with LSD as a discriminative stimulus, there was an intermediate degree (75%) of generalization to 5-MeO-DIPT and a dose-dependent suppression of response rates. These interoceptive effects were abolished by M100907, but were not significantly attenuated by WAY-100635. Finally, 5-MeO-DIPT had micromolar affinity for 5-HT 2A and 5-HT 2C receptors, but much higher affinity for 5-HT 1A receptors. 5-MeO-DIPT is thus effective in two rodent models of 5-HT2 agonist activity, and has affinity at receptors relevant to hallucinogen effects. The effectiveness with which M100907 antagonizes the behavioral actions of this compound, coupled with the lack of significant antagonist effects of WAY-100635, strongly suggests that the 5-HT 2A receptor is an important site of action for 5-MeO-DIPT, despite its apparent in vitro selectivity for the 5-HT 1A receptor.

The 5-HT1A receptor and the stimulus effects of LSD in the rat.

RATIONALE: It has been suggested that the 5-HT1A receptor plays a significant modulatory role in the stimulus effects of the indoleamine hallucinogen lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD). OBJECTIVE: The present study sought to characterize the effects of several compounds with known affinity for the 5-HT1A receptor on the discriminative stimulus effects of LSD. METHODS: Twelve male Fischer 344 rats were trained in a two-lever, fixed-ratio (FR) 10, and food-reinforced task with LSD (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.; 15-min pretreatment) as a discriminative stimulus. Combination and substitution tests with the 5-HT(1A) agonists, 8-OH-DPAT, buspirone, gepirone, and ipsapirone, with LSD-induced stimulus control were then performed. The effects of these 5-HT1A ligands were also tested in the presence of the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY-100,635 (0.3 mg/kg, s.c.; 30-min pretreatment). RESULTS: In combination tests, stimulus control by LSD was increased by all 5-HT1A receptor ligands with agonist properties. Similarly, in tests of antagonism, the increase in drug-appropriate responding caused by stimulation of the 5-HT1A receptor was abolished by administration of WAY-100,635. CONCLUSION: These data, obtained using a drug discrimination model of the hallucinogenic effects of LSD, provide support for the hypothesis that the 5-HT1A receptor has a significant modulatory role in the stimulus effects of LSD.

Serotonergic/glutamatergic interactions: potentiation of phencyclidine-induced stimulus control by citalopram.

Previous investigations in our laboratory have found that the stimulus effects of the hallucinogenic serotonergic agonists DOM and LSD are potentiated by phencyclidine [PCP], a non-competitive NMDA antagonist. Also suggestive of behaviorally significant serotonergic/glutamatergic interactions is our finding that stimulus control by both PCP and LSD is partially antagonized by the mGlu2/3 agonist, LY 379268. These observations coupled with the fact that the stimulus effects of LSD and DOM are potentiated by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs] led us in the present investigation to test the hypothesis that stimulus control by PCP is potentiated by the SSRI, citalopram. Stimulus control was established with PCP [3.0 mg/kg; 30 min pretreatment time] in a group of 12 rats. A two-lever, fixed ratio 10, positively reinforced task with saline controls was employed. Potentiation by citalopram of an intermediate dose of PCP was observed. In an attempt to establish the mechanism by which citalopram might interact with PCP, subsequent experiments examined the effects on that interaction of antagonists at serotonergic receptors. It was found that the selective 5-HT2C-selective antagonists, SDZ SER 082 and SB 242084, significantly, albeit only partially, blocked the effects of citalopram on PCP. In agreement with our previous conclusions regarding the interaction of citalopram with DOM, the present data suggest that potentiation of the stimulus effects of PCP by citalopram are mediated in part by agonist activity at 5-HT2C receptors.

The stimulus properties of LSD in C57BL/6 mice.

RATIONALE: Drug-induced stimulus control has proven to be a powerful tool for the assessment of a wide range of psychoactive drugs. Although a variety of species has been employed, the majority of studies have been in the rat. However, with the development of techniques which permit the genetic modification of mice, the latter species has taken on new importance. Lysergic acid diethylamide [LSD], the prototypic indoleamine hallucinogen, has not previously been trained as a discriminative stimulus in mice. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the feasibility of LSD-induced stimulus control in the mouse and to provide a preliminary characterization of the stimulus properties of LSD in that species. METHODS: Male C57BL/6 mice were trained using a left or right nose-poke operant on a fixed ratio 10, water reinforced task following the injection of lysergic acid diethylamide [LSD, 0.17 or 0.30 mg/kg, s.c.; 15 min pretreatment] or vehicle. RESULTS: Stimulus control was established in 6 of 16 mice at a dose of LSD of 0.17 mg/kg after 39 sessions. An increase in dose to 0.30 mg/kg for the remaining mice resulted in stimulus control in an additional 5 subjects. In the low dose group, subsequent experiments demonstrated an orderly dose-effect relationship for LSD and a rapid offset of drug action with an absence of LSD effects 60 min after injection. When LSD [0.17 mg/kg] was administered in combination with the selective 5-HT2A antagonist, M100907, LSD-appropriate responding was significantly but incompletely reduced to approximately 50%; concurrently, response rates declined significantly. In mice trained with a dose of LSD of 0.30 mg/kg, full generalization to the phenethylamine hallucinogen, [-]-2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine [DOM] was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The present data demonstrate the feasibility of LSD-induced stimulus control in the mouse. The general features of stimulus control by LSD in the mouse closely resemble those observed in the rat but the present data suggest that there may be significant differences as well.

Serotonergic/glutamatergic interactions: the effects of mGlu2/3 receptor ligands in rats trained with LSD and PCP as discriminative stimuli.

RATIONALE: On the basis of electrophysiological evidence, it has been proposed that both antagonism of NMDA receptors by drugs such as PCP and stimulation of 5- HT(2A) receptors by drugs such as LSD result in the release of glutamate. Furthermore, it has been observed that antagonists and agonists at mGlu(2/3) receptors increase and decrease, respectively, the release of glutamate. Taken together, these observations predict behaviorally significant interactions between ligands at mGlu(2/3) receptors and hallucinogens such as LSD and PCP. OBJECTIVE: The present study sought to test in rats the glutamate hypothesis of hallucinogenesis using drug-induced stimulus control as the dependent variable and selected glutamatergic and serotonergic receptor ligands as independent variables. METHODS: Male F-344 rats were trained in a two-lever, fixed ratio 10, food-reinforced task with either phencyclidine (PCP; 3.0 mg/kg; i.p.; 30 min pretreatment) or lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD; 0.1 mg/kg; IP; 15 min pretreatment) as discriminative stimuli. The interactions of PCP and the mGlu(2/3) selective ligands, LY341495 and LY379268, with stimulus control by LSD were determined. The effects of these drugs were compared with those of serotonergic antagonists known to antagonize the stimulus effects of LSD, specifically, pirenperone and M100907. RESULTS: Stimulus control by LSD was potentiated by both PCP and the mGlu(2/3) antagonist, LY341495. In tests of antagonism, stimulus control by LSD was significantly but incompletely diminished by the mGlu(2/3) agonist, LY379268; this result was in contrast with the complete antagonism of LSD by both pirenperone and M100907. In PCP-trained rats, LY341495 was without effect on stimulus control by an intermediate dose of PCP. In contrast, the training dose of PCP was significantly but incompletely antagonized by LY379268. CONCLUSIONS: These data, obtained using a stimulus control model of the hallucinogenic effects of PCP and LSD, provide support for the hypothesis that glutamate release is a factor in hallucinogenesis by both 5-HT(2) agonists and non-competitive NMDA antagonists.

A sensitive method for determining levels of [-]-2,5,-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine in the brain tissue.

INTRODUCTION: Indolamine and phenethylamine hallucinogens are drugs of abuse and, as well, mimic some aspects of idiopathic psychosis. To assist in investigating the mechanisms of action of (-)2,5-dimethoxy4-methylamphetamine ([-]-DOM), a member of the phenethylamine class of serotonergic hallucinogens, a sensitive and precise method for determining its levels in the brain tissue is required. METHODS: We now describe a method for determining nanogram quantities of [-]-DOM in the rat brain tissue using D-amphetamine as an intemal standard. The method employs solvent extraction with toluene and derivatization with trifluoroacetic acid anhydride (TFAA) followed by analysis using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GS-MS) in the selective ion monitoring (SIM) mode. RESULTS: With SIM detection, our overall recoveries were greater than 90%. The method was reliable in terms of within-day and between-day precision, accuracy, and linearity. The procedure was applied to animal subjects to determine the in vivo [-]-DOM brain levels following intraperitoneal (ip) administration. Our findings indicate that peak levels of [-]-DOM do not coincide with the 75-min pretreatment time established by drug-induced stimulus control. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates a sensitive and precise analytical method for the determination of [-]-DOM levels in the rat brain following systemic administration of behaviorally relevant doses.

Potentiation of DOM-induced stimulus control by fluoxetine and citalopram: role of pharmacokinetics.

The present investigation examined the interaction between 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine [DOM] and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor [SSRI] citalopram in rats trained with DOM [0.6 mg/kg; 75 min pretreatment time] as a discriminative stimulus. Pretreatment with citalopram at a dose of 1.0 mg/kg shifted the DOM dose response relationship to the left. Unlike previously tested SSRI's, the enhancement of DOM-induced stimulus control occurred in the absence of significant partial substitution by citalopram. DOM brain levels were measured using a GC-MS method both in the presence and absence of citalopram and fluoxetine in order to evaluate the pharmacokinetic contribution to the observed behavioral effect. The data indicated that fluoxetine but not citalopram significantly increased DOM brain levels. It is concluded that the effects of DOM as a discriminative stimulus are potentiated by the acute administration of citalopram and this effect is not mediated by additivity or pharmacokinetic mechanisms.

Nefazodone in the rat: mimicry and antagonism of [-]-DOM-induced stimulus control.

Nefazodone is presently marketed as an antidepressant that inhibits both serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) and norepinephrine reuptake while antagonizing pirenpirone (5-HT2) receptors. This 5-HT receptor type is believed to play a prominent role in the underlying mechanism of action of serotonergic hallucinogens. Antidepressant medications now represent the most commonly prescribed psychoactive medications in the world and are likely to be ingested in the presence of hallucinogens with increased frequency; the consequences are largely unknown. The present investigation examined the interaction between the serotonergic phenethylamine hallucinogen [-]-2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine ([-]-DOM), and nefazodone, in rats trained with [-]-DOM [0.6 mg/kg; 75 min pretreatment time] as a discriminative stimulus. The data indicate that maximal substitution of nefazodone for the [-]-DOM stimulus was present using a 45-min pretreatment time before testing. Using this pretreatment time, a dose of nefazodone of 12.0 mg/kg administered alone resulted in 76% DOM-appropriate responding. When a range of doses of nefazodone was combined with the training dose of [-]-DOM, a pattern of responding compatible with partial agonism was observed. The intermediate degree of [-]-DOM generalization to nefazodone was significantly antagonized by the 5-HT antagonists, 5-HT2, SR 46349B (5HT2A/2C), and M100907 (5-HT2A). Taken together, the present data suggest that (a) nefazodone acts as a partial agonist and (b) these effects are mediated by the 5-HT2A receptor.

The effects of acute and subchronic treatment with fluoxetine and citalopram on stimulus control by DOM.

Previous reports from our laboratory have provided evidence that acute, i.e., concurrent, treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) augments the stimulus effects of indoleamine and phenethylamine hallucinogens in the rat. In the present investigation, the acute effects of fluoxetine and citalopram on stimulus control induced by (-)-2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM) were compared with those following subchronic, i.e., 10-day treatment with the SSRIs. Stimulus control was established using DOM (0.56 mg/kg; 75-min pretreatment time) in a group of 11 rats. A two-lever, fixed ratio 10, positively reinforced task with saline controls was employed. The effects of a range of doses of DOM when given alone were compared with those following both acute and subchronic pretreatment with fluoxetine and citalopram in combination with DOM. It was found that acute administration of fluoxetine and citalopram potentiated the stimulus effects of DOM. Furthermore, it was observed that the degree of potentiation was not diminished by treatment with either fluoxetine or citalopram for a period of 10 days. It is concluded that whatever adaptive changes may take place in response to a 10-day period of treatment with either citalopram or fluoxetine, these adaptations are independent of the mechanisms responsible for the potentiation of the stimulus effects of DOM by the SSRIs.

A 5-HT(2C) receptor-mediated interaction between 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine and citalopram in the rat.

Previous studies conducted in our laboratory have shown that acute administration of the selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI), citalopram, potentiates the stimulus effects of the phenethylamine hallucinogen [-]-2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM) in the rat while neither substituting for the DOM stimulus when administered alone nor altering brain levels of DOM. The present investigation was designed to determine the mechanism by which citalopram acts on DOM-induced stimulus control. To that end, we tested the following hypotheses: (a) citalopram blocks the transport of DOM by the serotonin transporter, (b) citalopram acts via the 5-HT(1A) receptor, and (c) citalopram acts via the 5-HT(2C) receptor. Hypothesis (a) was rejected on the basis of equilibrium saturation studies of [3H]citalopram binding, which revealed no significant affinity of DOM for the 5-HT transporter of rat brain membranes. Hypotheses (b) and (c) were tested in a group of 20 rats in which stimulus control was established with DOM (0.6 mg/kg; 75 min pretreatment time). A two-lever, fixed ratio 10 (FR10), positively reinforced task with saline controls was employed. Hypothesis (b), a role for the 5-HT(1A) receptor, was rejected on the basis of an absence of antagonism of the effects of citalopram on DOM by the selective 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist, WAY-100635. In contrast, Hypothesis (c), a role for the 5-HT(2C) receptor, gained support from the observation of significant antagonism of the effects of citalopram on DOM by the selective 5-HT(2C) receptor antagonist, SB-242084.

Behavioral characterization of 2-O-desmethyl and 5-O-desmethyl metabolites of the phenylethylamine hallucinogen DOM.

The present investigation was undertaken to test the hypothesis that known metabolites of the phenylethylamine hallucinogen 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOM) are pharmacologically active. This hypothesis was tested by evaluating the ability of racemic DOM metabolites 2-O-desmethyl DOM (2-DM-DOM) and 5-O-desmethyl DOM (5-DM-DOM) to substitute for the stimulus properties of (+)lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD). The data indicate that both metabolites are active in LSD-trained subjects and are significantly inhibited by the selective 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist M100907. Full generalization of LSD to both 2-DM-DOM and 5-DM-DOM occurred, and 5-DM-DOM was slightly more potent than 2-DM-DOM. Similarly, 5-DM-DOM had a slightly higher affinity than 2-DM-DOM for both 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2C) receptors. Additionally, it was of interest to determine if the formation of active metabolite(s) resulted in a temporal delay associated with maximal stimulus effects of DOM. We postulated that if metabolite formation resulted in the aforementioned delay, direct administration of the metabolites might result in maximally stable stimulus effects at an earlier pretreatment time. This hypothesis was tested by evaluating (1) the time point at which DOM produces the greatest degree of LSD-appropriate responding, (2) the involvement of 5-HT(2A) receptor in the stimulus effects of DOM at various pretreatment times by administration of M100907 and (3) the ability of 2-DM-DOM and 5-DM-DOM to substitute for the stimulus properties of LSD using either 15- or 75-min pretreatment time. The data indicate that (a) the DOM stimulus produces the greatest degree of LSD-appropriate responding at the 75-min time point in comparison with earlier pretreatment times and (b) the stimulus effects of DOM are differentially antagonized by M100907 and this effect is a function of DOM pretreatment time prior to testing. Both 2-DM-DOM and 5-DM-DOM were found to be most active, at all doses tested, using a 75-min versus a 15-min pretreatment time. The present data do not permit unequivocal acceptance or rejection of the hypothesis that active metabolites of (-)-DOM provide a full explanation of the observed discrepancy between brain levels of (-)-DOM and maximal stimulus effects.