Phase II study of carboplatin and etoposide in patients with anaplastic progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with or without neuroendocrine differentiation: results of the French Genito-Urinary Tumor Group (GETUG) P01 trial.

BACKGROUND: In the evolution of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), patients present visceral metastases with or without neuroendocrine differentiation in 20% of cases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed the efficacy and toxicity of a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen in mCRPC patients with either neuroendocrine differentiation defined by high serum levels of chromogranin A (CgA) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) or visceral metastases. Patients received the combination of carboplatin and etoposide every 3 weeks. Efficacy end points included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and neuroendocrine marker response, objective response and toxicity. RESULTS: Of the 60 patients included from April 2005 to January 2008, 78.6% had bone metastases, 46.4% had lymph node involvement and 57.1% had liver and/or lung localizations. The objective response rate was 8.9% in the 46 patients with measurable disease. A neuroendocrine response was observed in 31% of cases for NSE and 7% for CgA. The PSA response rate was 8%. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related toxic effects were neutropenia (65.5%), thrombocytopenia (32.7%) and anemia (27.3%). There was 7.2% febrile neutropenia, with one toxicity-related death. The median follow-up was 9.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2-27.1] and the median overall survival 9.6 months (95% CI 8.7-12.7). CONCLUSION: The benefit-risk ratio of this regimen seems unfavorable due to poor response and high toxicity.

Pegase 03: a prospective randomized phase III trial of FEC with or without high-dose thiotepa, cyclophosphamide and autologous stem cell transplantation in first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Pegase 03 is a multicenter prospective randomized phase III trial evaluating the impact of first-line high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with stem cell support on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and response rate in 308 patients with histologically proven metastatic breast cancer responding to induction therapy. Eligible patients received four induction cycles with FEC 100 (5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2), epirubicin 100 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2)). Patients with objective response (N=179) were randomized to one cycle of HDC (cyclophosphamide 6000 mg/m(2) and thiotepa 800 mg/m(2) (CHUT)) and stem cell support (N=88), or no further treatment (N=91). All patients were observed until disease progression or death. One toxic death occurred after CHUT. Other toxicities were manageable. The response rate at 3 months was higher in the intensification arm: 82.7% (25.3% complete response (CR)) versus 59.2% (14.1% CR) (P=0.0002). Median follow-up was 48 months. Median DFS was 11 and 6.6 months in the intensification and the observation arms, respectively (P=0.0001). There was no survival difference: 33.6 versus 27.3% OS at 3 years (P=0.8) and 22.9 versus 22.3 months median time to relapse in the intensification and observation arms, respectively. In this randomized trial, HDC with CHUT improved DFS but not OS, corroborating findings from earlier trials.

[Germ cell testicular tumors: understanding the kinetics of serum human chorionic gonadotropin during chemotherapy]. / Tumeurs germinales du testicule : comprendre les cinétiques de la gonadotrophine chorionique humaine (hCG) sérique sous chimiothérapie.

The analysis of longitudinal series of tumour markers during chemotherapy in patients with germ cells tumors is not easy. The purpose of this work is to present various characteristic profiles of the evolution of serum human chorionic gonadotropin during chemotherapy and review the modalities of the dynamic interpretation of this marker.

[Germ cell testicular tumors: understanding the kinetics of serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) during chemotherapy]. / Tumeurs germinales non séminomateuses du testicule : comprendre les cinétiques d'alpha-foetoprotéine (AFP) sous chimiothérapie.

The analysis of longitudinal series of tumour markers during chemotherapy in patients with germ cells tumors is not easy. The purpose of this work is to present various characteristic profiles of the evolution of serum alpha-fetoprotein during chemotherapy and review the modalities of the dynamic interpretation of this marker.

Pegfilgrastim supports delivery of FEC-100 chemotherapy in elderly patients with high risk breast cancer: a randomized phase 2 trial.

This randomized phase 2 study explored the feasibility of delivering four to six cycles of the dose-intensified regimen FEC-100 (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide) to elderly patients with stage II-III breast cancer, using pegfilgrastim for neutrophil support. Sixty patients aged 65-77 years received single 6mg doses of pegfilgrastim on day 2 of FEC-100, either as primary prophylaxis (all cycles: PP), or as secondary prophylaxis (all cycles following a neutropenic event: SP). Neutropenic events (a composite endpoint that included grade 3 neutropenia+fever, grade 4 neutropenia, infectious complication requiring systemic anti-infectives and chemotherapy dose delay/reduction) occurred in 24/30 (80%) of the PP and 21/29 (72%) of the SP group in the first cycle. Most patients received all chemotherapy cycles at full dose on schedule (26/30 [87%] PP; 20/29 [69%] SP). These data indicate that delivery of FEC-100 is feasible with pegfilgrastim support in elderly breast cancer patients.

A study from the EORTC new drug development group: open label phase II study of sabarubicin (MEN-10755) in patients with progressive hormone refractory prostate cancer.

Sabarubicin (MEN-10755), a new synthetic anthracycline analogue, was evaluated for safety and efficacy in a multicentre phase II study in patients with advanced hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Thirty seven patients were included, of which 34 were evaluable for PSA response according to Bubley's criteria. Sabarubicin was administered as a short (30 min) intravenous infusion at a dose of 80 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. The main toxicity consisted of grade 3/4 neutropenia in 24 patients (64.9%), with grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia occurring in one patient only. Grade 3/4 cardiotoxicity was observed in 4 patients including one ineligible. Other toxicities were mild. Nine patients achieved a PSA response (26.5%), 10 patients had stable disease (29.4%) and 14 patients disease progression (41.2%). One patient (2.9%) had a PSA response that was not confirmed by repeat PSA testing. The objective response rate according to RECIST criteria was 6.7% in 15 patients with measurable disease. The median duration of PSA responses was relatively long 7.1 months (95% CI 4.9-20.7) as was the median time to treatment progression in patients with stable disease. The median overall survival was 18.7 months (95% CI 9.1-N), comparable to results recently observed in taxotere-containing regimens. To confirm and extend these results, further testing of sabarubicin in larger trials is warranted.

Doxorubicin and paclitaxel versus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10961 Multicenter Phase III Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of doxorubicin and paclitaxel (AT) with a standard doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) regimen as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were anthracycline-naive and had bidimensionally measurable metastatic breast cancer. Two hundred seventy-five patients were randomly assigned to be treated with AT (doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) as an intravenous bolus plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) as a 3-hour infusion) or AC (doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. A paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)) and cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m(2)) dose escalation was planned at cycle 2 if no grade >or= 3 neutropenia occurred in cycle 1. The primary efficacy end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were response rate (RR), safety, overall survival (OS), and quality of life. RESULTS: A median number of six cycles were delivered in the two treatment arms. The relative dose-intensity and delivered cumulative dose of doxorubicin were lower in the AT arm. Dose escalation was only possible in 17% and 20% of the AT and AC patients, respectively. Median PFS was 6 months in the two treatments arms. RR was 58% versus 54%, and median OS was 20.6 versus 20.5 months in the AT and AC arms, respectively. The AT regimen was characterized by a higher incidence of febrile neutropenia, 32% versus 9% in the AC arm. CONCLUSION: No differences in the efficacy study end points were observed between the two treatment arms. Treatment-related toxicity compromised doxorubicin-delivered dose-intensity in the paclitaxel-based regimen

A randomized double-blind comparison of ondansetron and metoclopramide in the prophylaxis of emesis induced by cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil, and doxorubicin or epirubicin chemotherapy.

Seventy-five breast cancer patients scheduled to receive a first course (in a new cycle) of cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil, and doxorubicin (FAC) or epirubicin (FEC) participated in a double-blind crossover study to compare the antiemetic efficacy and safety of ondansetron (GR38032), a 5-hydroxytryptamine3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonist, and metoclopramide. Ondansetron was given as an 8 mg loading dose (4 mg intravenously [IV] plus 4 mg orally) before chemotherapy followed by 8 mg every 8 hours orally for 3 to 5 days. Metoclopramide was given as an 80 mg loading dose (60 mg IV plus 20 mg orally) before chemotherapy followed by 20 mg every 8 hours orally for 3 to 5 days. A "period" interaction in the analysis of emetic response in the first 24 hours necessitated a parallel group analysis of first treatments only, 68 patients being assessable for this parameter. In the first 24 hours, complete or major control (zero to two emetic episodes) of emesis was achieved in 30 of 35 (86%) patients receiving ondansetron and in 14 of 33 (42%) patients receiving metoclopramide (P less than .001). Ondansetron was also more effective in reducing acute nausea. On days 2 to 3, the complete or major responses were significantly better with ondansetron (81% v 65%; P = .033), but there was no statistical difference in the control of nausea. There was a significant patient preference for ondansetron (63% v 26%; P = .001). Extrapyramidal reactions were observed in two metoclopramide treatments; both treatments were otherwise well tolerated. These results are consistent with serotonin (5-HT), being a significant neurotransmitter of cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin- or epirubicin/fluorouracil-induced emesis.

Efficacy of lenograstim on hematologic tolerance to MAID chemotherapy in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma and consequences on treatment dose-intensity.

PURPOSE: This two-arm, double-blind, randomized trial was conducted to determine the effects of lenograstim, a glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rHu-G-CSF), on the hematologic tolerance of patients with sarcoma treated with mesna, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and doxorubicin (MAID) chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients with metastatic or locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma were, following the first cycle of a combination with doxorubicin 60 mg/m2, ifosfamide 7.5 g/m2, and dacarbazine 900 mg/m2, ifosfamide 7.5 g/m2, and dacarbazine 900 mg/m2 given on days 1 to 3, randomized to receive either lenograstim 5 micrograms/kg/d by once-daily injection from day 4 to day 13, or its vehicle. For subsequent cycles, 28 patients continued on the same chemotherapy and lenograstim was systematically given as prophylactic treatment in an open manner. RESULTS: Following the first cycle of MAID, the duration of neutropenia was reduced in patients who received lenograstim as compared with those who received placebo, with a median duration of neutropenia ( < 0.5 x 10(9)/L neutrophils) of 0 days (range, 0 to 3) and 5 days (range, 0 to 10), respectively (P < .001). All patients who received lenograstim had recovered at least 1 x 10(9)/L neutrophils (polymorphonuclear lymphocytes [PMN]) on day 14, compared with only one of 26 in the placebo group (P < .001). The median time to recover this neutrophil level was 12 days (range, 10 to 13) and 17 days (range, 14 to 21), respectively (P < .001). Neutropenic fever occurred in five (23%) and 15 (58%) patients respectively (P = .02). Twenty-eight patients received at least two cycles (median, four) of MAID at the same dose. Toxicity remained constant across all treatment cycles. A progressive increase in thrombocytopenia was noted, with median platelet nadirs of 102 x 10(9)/L at cycle 2 and 19.5 x 10(9)/L at cycle 6, but did not result in significant treatment modifications. Consequently, median relative dose-intensities remained greater than 0.95 for up to six consecutive MAID cycles. CONCLUSION: Lenograstim significantly improved hematologic tolerance in patients treated with the MAID chemotherapy regimen and, therefore, allowed optimal adhesion to the theoretic doses planned for up to six cycles. Whether such an optimization in relative dose-intensity will result in an improvement of treatment efficacy remains to be determined.

Lenograstim prevents morbidity from intensive induction chemotherapy in the treatment of inflammatory breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rHuG-CSF) versus its inert vehicle in patients with unilateral nonmetastatic inflammatory breast cancer treated with fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide high-dose (FEC-HD) neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty patients have been enrolled by nine French centers in this double-blind, parallel-group, vehicle-controlled study to compare at each cycle subcutaneous lenograstim (5 micrograms/kg/d) with placebo given from day 6 to day 15 after the induction chemotherapy (day 1 to day 4, fluorouracil 750 mg/m2 continuous intravenous [IV] infusion; day 2 to day 4, epirubicin 35 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m2 both IV push). Four cycles were planned every 3 weeks before locoregional treatment. Patients with febrile neutropenia remained blinded for the subsequent cycles. RESULTS: Lenograstim significantly reduced the duration of neutropenia at less than 0.5 x 10(9)/L and less than 1 x 10(9)/L to a median duration of 2 and 3 days, respectively, as compared with 5 and 7 days in the placebo group. This translated into a statistically significant reduced incidence of microbiologically documented infections, and a decreased need for rehospitalizations for infectious events and antibiotic use. Clinical objective tumor response rate observed after four cycles was 89.6% and 93%, respectively, in the placebo and treated groups. Mild transient bone and injection-site pain, myelemia, and hyperleukocytosis were the most frequently reported adverse events associated with lenograstim. CONCLUSION: Lenograstim is safe and effective to reduce morbidity associated with FEC-HD neoadjuvant chemotherapy in inflammatory breast cancer. Response rate is not affected.

Results of a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Early Clinical Studies Group phase II trial of first-line irinotecan in patients with advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and tolerability of irinotecan (CPT-11) in advanced or recurrent cervical carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had histologically confirmed, inoperable, progressive, metastatic or recurrent squamous cell cervical carcinoma and had received no radiotherapy in the preceding 3 months and had never received chemotherapy. The initial irinotecan dosage of 350 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks was modifiable according to toxicity. Treatment continued for six cycles after complete response, or until disease progression or excessive toxicity after partial response, or for three additional cycles in the case of stable disease. Patients were stratified into group A (>/= one measurable lesion in a previously unirradiated area, with or without progressive disease in irradiated fields) or group B (measurable new lesion[s] in an irradiated field). RESULTS: Fifty-one of 55 enrolled patients were eligible for inclusion (median age, 47 years; range, 30 to 71 years). The response rate was 15.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.0% to 28.6%) overall, 23.5% (95% CI, 10.7% to 41.2%) for group A (complete response, 2.9%), and zero for group B. The median time to progression and median survival were 4.0 and 8.2 months for group A and 2.5 and 4.2 months for group B, respectively. The major grade 3/4 toxicities for groups A and B were diarrhea (24.3% and 55.5%, respectively) and neutropenia (24.3% and 33.3%, respectively). There were four toxicity-related deaths, three in group B. Patients with no prior external pelvic irradiation experienced fewer grade 3 and 4 adverse events. CONCLUSION: Irinotecan is effective in treating cervical squamous cell carcinoma if disease is located in an unirradiated area. Because of toxicity, a reduced dose is advised for patients previously treated with external pelvic irradiation.

Adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, fluorouracil, and vincristine versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil: final report after a 16-year median follow-up duration.

PURPOSE: To determine the long-term impact on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy, when prospectively compared by random allocation with standard cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) in node-positive (N+) breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred forty-nine patients with N+ breast cancer, recruited from eight French cancer centers, were randomized to receive 12 monthly cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy, either CMF (n = 112) or doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and fluorouracil (AVCF) (n = 136). All had a negative metastatic work-up before inclusion, which was stratified by accrual center, tumor stage (International Union Against Cancer [UICC]), and menopausal status. RESULTS: No severe adverse effect related to grade 4 (World Health Organization [WHO]) toxicity was observed. There was no difference in second primary tumor incidence between the two arms. The treatment given was 88% of planned for AVCF and 75% for CMF in both premenopausal and menopausal patients. With a median follow-up time of 16 years (range, 13 to 17), the OS and DFS rates are significantly longer in the AVCF arm (56% v 41% [P = .01] for OS, and 53% v 36% [P = .006] for DFS). These differences are significant, irrespective of tumor stage (T1 to T2 v T3 to T4), and remain positive in patients with or without postoperative locoregional radiotherapy (55% of cohort). When analyzed according to menopausal status, the differences remain significant only for premenopausal patients. CONCLUSION: This set of mature controlled data confirms the added value of anthracycline-based combination adjuvant therapy for N+ breast cancer patients when compared with CMF, with both regimens given for 1 year.

Tetracosactrin vs. methylprednisolone in the prevention of emesis in patients receiving FEC regimen for breast cancer.

0.5 mg tetracosactrin is considered to be equivalent to 40 mg methylprednisolone with regard to the induced cortisol secretion. 97 female breast cancer patients who received their first two FEC courses (epirubicin 50-75 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) entered this randomised crossover study (76 had previously received an adjuvant treatment); tetracosactrin was administered intramuscularly and methylprednisolone intravenously immediately before chemotherapy administration. The tolerability was evaluated using a diary card during 5 days and patients were asked for their preference at the end of the two cycles. There was no difference either for vomiting (dry heaves were included) or nausea between the two treatments (the analysis was performed on day 1, the worse day of days 2 and 3 and the worse day of days 4 and 5). At day 1, 49% of the patients experienced no or mild nausea after tetracosactrin and 62% after methylprednisolone (not significant) (first period analysis); a complete control of vomiting (including dry heaves) was observed in 49% of the patients after tetracosactrin and 53% after methylprednisolone (not significant). No difference was observed between patients with or without previous chemotherapy. However, slightly more patients preferred tetracosactrin (P = 0.048).

Fotemustine plus dacarbazine for malignant melanoma.

119 patients with metastatic melanoma received fotemustine 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and dacarbazine 250 mg/m2 on days 15-18. After a 5-week rest, fotemustine 100 mg/m2 on day 1 and dacarbazine 250 mg/m2 on days 2-5 was given every 3-4 weeks. 12 complete responses (11.6%) and 16 partial responses were observed in 103 evaluable patients (response rate 27.2%). The median duration of response was 21.5+ weeks (8+ to 53+). The response rate was 26.3% in CNS, 18.2% in visceral sites and 37.5% in non-visceral sites. The toxicity was mainly haematological: grade III-IV leukopenia in 27.4% and thrombocytopenia in 23.4%. The response rate was lower than that in 63 patients previously reported. The present series had a higher median age (54 vs. 40 years) without any differences in other population variables. However, activity on CNS metastases and on non-visceral sites was confirmed. Haematological toxicity was about 50% lower than that with fotemustine alone. Hence, this is an active outpatient regimen for metastatic melanoma, especially against cerebral and non-visceral metastases.

M-VAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin) for advanced carcinoma of the bladder. The French Federation of Cancer Centers experience.

70 patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder received methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (M-VAC). Complete responses (CR) were obtained in 13 of the 67 (19%) evaluable patients and partial responses (PR) in 25 patients for an objective response rate of 57% (95% CI 45-69%). Of the 54 patients who have had a minimum follow-up of 2 years, 8 patients (15%) are disease-free or have stable residual disease. Median survival of the 70 patients was 13 months. Toxicity was acceptable with no drug-related deaths. Because of myelosuppression, only 15 patients (21%) received treatment without delays in drug administration or modifications from the planned schedule. Our results confirm that this regimen is effective, with some patients being long-term survivors.

Baseline health-related quality-of-life data as prognostic factors in a phase III multicentre study of women with metastatic breast cancer.

The potential value of baseline health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) and clinical factors in predicting prognosis was examined using data from an international randomised phase III trial which compared doxorubicin and paclitaxel with doxorubicin and cylophosphamide as first line chemotherapy in 275 women with metastatic breast cancer. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and the related breast module (QLQ-BR23) were used to assess baseline HRQOL data. The Cox proportional-hazards regression model was used for both univariate and multivariate analyses of survival. In the univariate analyses, performance status (P<0.001) and number of sites involved (P=0.001) were the most important clinical prognostic factors. The HRQOL variables at baseline most strongly associated with longer survival were better appetite, physical and role functioning, as well as less fatigue (P<0.001). The final multivariate model retained performance status (P<0.001) and appetite loss (P=0.005) as the variables best predicting survival. Substantial loss of appetite was the only independent HRQOL factor predicting poor survival and was strongly correlated (/r/>0.5) with fatigue, role and physical functioning. In addition to known clinical factors, appetite loss appears to be a significant prognostic factor for survival in women with metastatic breast cancer. However, the mechanism underlying this association remains to be precisely defined in future studies.

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the lung: report of a case of an unusual alpha-fetoprotein-producing lung tumor.

We report on a rare tumor of the lung characterized by its morphologic hepatoid features and alpha-fetoprotein production. This unusual neoplasm arose in the left lung of a 36-year-old man in whom clinical and radiologic examinations did not reveal any other tumor. The serum level of alpha-fetoprotein was measured at 6,090 ng/mL and was parallel to the evolution of the tumor. Despite treatment, the patient died 7 months after the diagnosis. The microscopic appearance of the tumor was the same as observed in hepatocarcinoma and hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the ovary or the stomach, with a tubular, papillary, or trabecular pattern. Periodic acid-Schiff-positive hyaline globules were numerous, and tumor cells showed immunohistologic positivity for alpha-fetoprotein and carcinoembryonic antigen. This lung adenocarcinoma was first described by Ishikura et al. in 1990 and was named hepatoid lung adenocarcinoma. Like the rare hepatoid carcinoma of the gallbladder, the pancreas, the ampulla of Vater, the renal pelvis, and the bladder, the exact histogenesis and the prognosis of this type of lung tumor are not yet known.

Premenopausal patients with node-positive resectable breast cancer. Preliminary results of a randomised trial comparing 3 adjuvant regimens: FEC 50 x 6 cycles vs FEC 50 x 3 cycles vs FEC 75 x 3 cycles. The French Adjuvant Study Group.

Anthracyclines are among the most active drugs for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Epirubicin has been found to be as effective as doxorubicin at equimolar doses but significantly better tolerated, especially in terms of alopecia, leucopenia, and cardiac toxicity. The role of anthracycline-containing regimens in adjuvant treatment of breast cancer has been studied by only a few clinical trial teams. In 1986, the French Adjuvant Study Group (FASG) began a randomised trial aimed to investigate the concept of dose intensity as well as the optimal duration of treatment in patients with early breast cancer. Between 1986 and 1990, 621 patients were included in the trial, of whom 595 were evaluable. Patients were randomised to 1 of 3 treatment groups: Group A (n = 207) received FEC 50 (fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) every 21 days for 6 cycles; Group B (n = 193) received FEC 50 every 21 days for 3 cycles; Group C (n = 195) received FEC 75 (fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 75 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) every 21 days for 3 cycles. Locoregional radiotherapy was administered after the third cycle of chemotherapy in all treatment arms. Clinical prognostic factors were similar between treatment groups. Approximately 62% of all patients had 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes; 50% of patients were hormone receptor positive and 73% were Scarff-Bloom Richardson (SBR) grade 2 to 3. Toxicity was evaluated in 595 patients (207, 193 and 195 patients in Groups A, B and C, respectively), who received a total of 2301 chemotherapy cycles.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

p53 gene alterations are associated with a decreased responsiveness to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in human breast cancer.

Recent evidence indicates that alterations of the p53 tumor suppressor gene can modulate the response of tumor cells to DNA-damaging agents and increase drug resistance. To evaluate whether p53 alterations affect response to chemotherapy in breast cancer, we examined the p53 status before and after treatment of primary tumors from 44 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. p53 status was determined by gene mutations and by mRNA expression levels. Eleven patients (25%) showed alterations in the p53 gene. Comparison of the clinical response between subgroups with or without p53 alterations revealed that p53 alterations were strongly associated to clinical resistance to chemotherapy (p<0.001).

Dose-dependent hormonal effects of toremifene in postmenopausal breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to compare hormonal effects of three toremifene doses, 20 mg (TOR20), 40 mg (TOR40) and 60 mg (TOR60) administered daily, in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. METHODS: The study was randomized and open label in three parallel groups. Biochemical variables were identified as the serum concentrations of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG). The changes were compared with objective clinical responses and to progression-free time. Adverse reactions and liver function test (aspartate aminotransferase, ASAT) were assessed for safety. RESULTS: A total of 260 patients were randomly grouped (90 to TOR20, 81 to TOR40 and 89 to TOR60). Of these patients 29, 29 and 22 completed at least 3 months of treatment and the results were analyzed for biochemical variables. All treatments had intrinsic estrogen agonist activity by decreasing of serum FSH and LH and by increasing of SHBG during the first 3 months (P < 0.01). Dose TOR20 showed slightly longer times to exert maximum estrogenic effects than did the two higher doses. No increases in liver function tests were seen in any of the groups. Objective response rates were 24.4, 39.5 and 32.6% (P = 0.01) and median times-to-progression were 206, 189 and 196 days in TOR20, TOR40 and TOR60, respectively (P = 0.913). Fewer responses were observed in the TOR20 group than in TOR40 (P = 0.05). Adverse events were reported in 19, 23 and 30 patients in the treatment groups (P = 0.20). The most frequently reported events were hot flushes and nausea. These were mostly mild or moderate, and only 1.5% of treatments was discontinued due to toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Toremifene doses of 40 and 60 mg daily were effective and safe treatments of breast cancer in postmenopausal women, and no differences in their biochemical or clinical effects were seen. Toremifene at 20 mg/day had similar but slightly less potent antiestrogenic and estrogenic effects than the two higher doses.