Subject(s)
Fear , Physician-Patient Relations , Prejudice , Attitude of Health Personnel , Female , Humans , Male , Motorcycles , Pain ManagementSubject(s)
Hospitals, Veterans , World War II , Humans , Internship and Residency , Male , Middle Aged , Pancreatic NeoplasmsSubject(s)
Physician-Patient Relations , Aged , Humans , Iran/ethnology , Male , Pancreatic Neoplasms/therapy , Poetry as Topic , TranslatingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Healthcare worker attitudes toward obese individuals facilitate discrimination and contribute to poor health outcomes. Previous studies have demonstrated medical student bias toward obese individuals, but few have examined effects of the educational environment on these prejudicial beliefs. We sought to determine whether an innovative educational intervention (reading a play about obesity) could diminish obesity prejudice relative to a standard medical lecture. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled trial enrolling medical students (n = 129) from three universities. Students were assigned to play-reading or a standard lecture. Explicit attitudes and implicit bias toward obese individuals were assessed prior to intervention and after four months. RESULTS: At baseline, students demonstrated moderate explicit and implicit bias toward obese people despite high scores on empathy. Students randomized to the play-reading group had significantly decreased explicit fat bias (P = 0.01) at follow-up, while students in the lecture group showed increased endorsement of a prescriptive model of care at the expense of a patient-centered approach (P = 0.03). There was a significant increase in empathy for those in both the theater (P = 0.007) and lecture group (P = 0.02). The intervention had no significant effect on implicit bias or regard for obesity as a civil rights issue. DISCUSSION: Dramatic reading may be superior to traditional medical lectures for showcasing patient rights and preferences. The present study demonstrates for the first time that play-reading diminishes conscious obesity bias. Further research should determine whether nontraditional methods of instruction promote improved understanding of and care for obese patients.
Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Drama , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Obesity/prevention & control , Social Discrimination/prevention & control , Students, Medical/psychology , Adult , California , Civil Rights , Empathy , Female , Humans , Male , Minnesota , Obesity/psychology , Obesity/therapy , Physician-Patient Relations , Schools, Medical , Sex Factors , Social Discrimination/psychology , Teaching/methodsABSTRACT
Unsustainable rising health care costs in the United States have made reducing costs while maintaining high-quality health care a national priority. The overuse of some screening and diagnostic tests is an important component of unnecessary health care costs. More judicious use of such tests will improve quality and reflect responsible awareness of costs. Efforts to control expenditures should focus not only on benefits, harms, and costs but on the value of diagnostic tests-meaning an assessment of whether a test provides health benefits that are worth its costs or harms. To begin to identify ways that practicing clinicians can contribute to the delivery of high-value, cost-conscious health care, the American College of Physicians convened a workgroup of physicians to identify, using a consensus-based process, common clinical situations in which screening and diagnostic tests are used in ways that do not reflect high-value care. The intent of this exercise is to promote thoughtful discussions about these tests and other health care interventions to promote high-value, cost-conscious care.
Subject(s)
Diagnostic Tests, Routine/economics , Health Care Costs , Mass Screening/economics , Cost Control , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Internal Medicine/economics , United States , Unnecessary Procedures/economicsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Healthcare providers' attitudes toward sexual minorities influence patient comfort and outcomes. This study characterized medical student attitudes toward gay men, focusing on behavior, personhood, gay civil rights, and male toughness. METHODS: A cross-sectional web-based anonymous survey was sent to medical students enrolled at the University of California, Davis (N = 371) with a response rate of 68%. RESULTS: Few respondents expressed negative attitudes toward gay men or would deny them civil rights. More negative responses were seen with respect to aspects of intimate behavior and homosexuality as a natural form of sexual expression. Men and students younger than 25 years old were more likely to endorse negative attitudes toward behavior as well as more traditional views on male toughness. CONCLUSIONS: We show that an important minority of students express discomfort with the behavior of gay men and hold to a narrow construction of male identity. These findings suggest that competency training must move beyond conceptual discussions and address attitudes toward behaviors through new pedagogical approaches.